Mann Trent, Burns Emma, Van Bergen Penny, Jones Tiffany
School of Education, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, NSW, Australia.
School of Education, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
J Homosex. 2025;72(8):1580-1606. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2024.2384933. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Queer (LGBTQ+) students, LGBTQ+ staff and LGBTQ+ parents report schools can be unsafe and unwelcoming environments. Yet few studies have explored LGBTQ+ student, LGBTQ+ staff and LGBTQ+ parent perceptions of the school climate simultaneously or adopted person-centered perspectives. The present study sought to identify LGBTQ+ related strategies adopted by schools, and whether these were differentially related to perceptions of school safety and community. Data were collected in 2021 via online sampling of the current Australian school (1,937) students, (124) staff and (75) parents. Four distinct inclusion strategy profiles were identified via latent class analysis: , , and . Just under half (48.2%) of schools lacked LGBTQ+ strategies, with participants from these schools reporting greater safety concerns. Our findings suggest that curriculum and pedagogical strategies are likely the most effective and should be a key focus for improving the school climate. Schools that employed LGBTQ+ affirming practices and included LGBTQ+ resources and activities, like Gay-Straight Alliances (GSAs), saw improved perceptions of safety and community.
女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别者和酷儿(LGBTQ+)学生、LGBTQ+教职员工以及LGBTQ+家长表示,学校可能是不安全且不友好的环境。然而,很少有研究同时探讨LGBTQ+学生、LGBTQ+教职员工以及LGBTQ+家长对学校氛围的看法,或者采用以个人为中心的视角。本研究旨在确定学校采用的与LGBTQ+相关的策略,以及这些策略与学校安全和社区认知之间是否存在差异关系。2021年,通过对澳大利亚当前学校的学生(1937名)、教职员工(124名)和家长(75名)进行在线抽样收集数据。通过潜在类别分析确定了四种不同的包容策略概况: 、 、 和 。近一半(48.2%)的学校缺乏LGBTQ+相关策略,来自这些学校的参与者表示对安全问题更为担忧。我们的研究结果表明,课程和教学策略可能是最有效的,应该成为改善学校氛围的关键重点。采用LGBTQ+肯定性做法并纳入LGBTQ+资源和活动(如同性恋-异性恋联盟[GSA])的学校,其安全和社区认知得到了改善。