Calzo Jerel P, Andrzejewski Jack, Torres Catalina, Silverstein Scout, Lopez Ethan, Gordon Allegra R
School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, California, USA.
Action Research on Community Health Equity and Stigma Lab, Institute for Behavioral and Community Health, San Diego, California, USA.
Eat Disord. 2025 Jan-Feb;33(1):100-119. doi: 10.1080/10640266.2024.2381908. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
Transgender and gender diverse (TGD) young adults experience elevated risk for eating disorders (ED), partially due to cissexist discrimination and victimization; less is understood about how socioeconomic determinants contribute to their ED risk. Qualitative data collected from 66 TGD young adults (18-30 years old; 29% self-identified as transgender women, 29% as transgender men, 39% as nonbinary people, and 3% as another gender identity (e.g., māhū)) in eight asynchronous online focus groups explored how socioeconomic determinants in conjunction with other dimensions of identity and lived experience shape disordered eating behavior (DEB) and ED risk. Participants described how economic barriers-including poverty and dependency on others (e.g. parents for health insurance)-and challenges produced by insurance and healthcare systems impeded healthcare access to the detriment of their overall mental health and risk for ED. In addition, participants shared different ways they leveraged financial resources to cope with stress, sometimes in ways that impelled disordered eating behaviors. Finally, participants described how poverty, socioeconomic advantage and disadvantage, and classism compound other systems of oppression (e.g. racism, ableism, weight bias) to adversely impact their general health and ED risk.
跨性别和性别多样化(TGD)的年轻人患饮食失调症(ED)的风险较高,部分原因是顺性别歧视和受害经历;关于社会经济决定因素如何导致他们患饮食失调症的风险,人们了解得较少。从八个异步在线焦点小组的66名TGD年轻人(18至30岁;29%自称跨性别女性,29%为跨性别男性,39%为非二元性别者,3%为其他性别身份(如 māhū))收集的定性数据,探讨了社会经济决定因素如何与身份和生活经历的其他维度共同塑造饮食紊乱行为(DEB)和饮食失调症风险。参与者描述了经济障碍——包括贫困和对他人(如依赖父母提供医疗保险)的依赖,以及保险和医疗系统带来的挑战,如何阻碍了他们获得医疗保健,损害了他们的整体心理健康和患饮食失调症的风险。此外,参与者分享了他们利用财务资源应对压力的不同方式,有时这些方式会促使他们出现饮食紊乱行为。最后,参与者描述了贫困、社会经济优势和劣势以及阶级主义如何与其他压迫制度(如种族主义、能力主义、体重偏见)相互交织,对他们的总体健康和饮食失调症风险产生不利影响。