Suppr超能文献

用于健康研究的异步在线焦点小组:案例研究与经验教训

Asynchronous Online Focus Groups for Health Research: Case Study and Lessons Learned.

作者信息

Gordon Allegra R, Calzo Jerel P, Eiduson Rose, Sharp Kendall, Silverstein Scout, Lopez Ethan, Thomson Katharine, Reisner Sari L

机构信息

Department of Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.

Division of Adolescent/Young Adults Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Int J Qual Methods. 2021 Jan-Dec;20. doi: 10.1177/1609406921990489. Epub 2021 Feb 9.

Abstract

Increasingly, social life-and accordingly, social research-is conducted in online environments. Asynchronous online focus groups (AOFGs) have emerged as an important tool to conduct remote research with geographically diverse populations. However, there remain few systematic accounts of AOFG methods to guide researchers' decision-making in designing and implementing studies. This paper seeks to address this gap by describing a recent study on body image and health among transgender and gender diverse (TGD) young adults. In this study, eight AOFGs were conducted in August-October 2019 with 66 TGD young adults residing in 25 U.S. states. Each AOFG lasted four consecutive days with two prompts posted by moderators per day. Overall, participant satisfaction with AOFGs was high: 98% reported their experience was excellent, very good, or good and 95% would be somewhat or very likely to sign up for another AOFG. This example is used to illustrate key methodological decision-points, acceptability of the method to participants, and lessons learned. The goal of this paper is to encourage other researchers, particularly health researchers, to consider using AOFGs and to engage with the method's strengths and limitations in order to develop new opportunities for online technologies to enrich the field of qualitative health research.

摘要

社交生活以及相应的社会研究越来越多地在网络环境中进行。异步在线焦点小组(AOFGs)已成为对地理分布广泛的人群进行远程研究的重要工具。然而,关于AOFG方法的系统性描述仍然很少,难以指导研究人员在设计和实施研究时做出决策。本文旨在通过描述一项关于跨性别和性别多样化(TGD)年轻人的身体形象与健康的近期研究来填补这一空白。在这项研究中,2019年8月至10月对居住在美国25个州的66名TGD年轻人进行了8个AOFG。每个AOFG持续四天,主持人每天发布两个提示。总体而言,参与者对AOFG的满意度很高:98%的人表示他们的体验很好、非常好或良好,95%的人表示有点或非常有可能报名参加另一个AOFG。这个例子用于说明关键的方法学决策点、该方法对参与者的可接受性以及所学到的经验教训。本文的目的是鼓励其他研究人员,特别是健康研究人员,考虑使用AOFG,并了解该方法的优缺点,以便为在线技术创造新机会,丰富定性健康研究领域。

相似文献

1
Asynchronous Online Focus Groups for Health Research: Case Study and Lessons Learned.
Int J Qual Methods. 2021 Jan-Dec;20. doi: 10.1177/1609406921990489. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
3
Lessons Learned Designing and Using an Online Discussion Forum for Care Coordinators in Primary Care.
Qual Health Res. 2016 Nov;26(13):1851-1861. doi: 10.1177/1049732315609567. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
5
Sensitive Health Topics With Underserved Patient Populations: Methodological Considerations for Online Focus Group Discussions.
Qual Health Res. 2018 Aug;28(10):1658-1673. doi: 10.1177/1049732317705355. Epub 2017 May 4.
6
Transgender and Gender Diverse Fertility Choices: Supporting the Decision-Making Process for Adolescents and Young Adults.
J Pediatr. 2022 Jan;240:256-264.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2021.10.013. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
7
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
8
Patient-centered practices for engaging transgender and gender diverse patients in clinical research studies.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Oct 1;21(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01328-4.
9
Lessons learned using Web conference technology for online focus group interviews.
Qual Health Res. 2015 Jan;25(1):122-33. doi: 10.1177/1049732314549602. Epub 2014 Sep 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Virtual Focus Groups on Zoom: "Lessons Learned" from Two Physical Activity Studies among Black and African American Women and Children.
Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2025;28(2):209-220. doi: 10.1080/13645579.2024.2330050. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
2
Patient information needs for transparent and trustworthy cardiovascular artificial intelligence: A qualitative study.
PLOS Digit Health. 2025 Apr 21;4(4):e0000826. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000826. eCollection 2025 Apr.
5
9
Exploring gender differences in uptake of GP partnership roles: a qualitative mixed-methods study.
Br J Gen Pract. 2023 Jun 29;73(732):e545-e555. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2022.0544. Print 2023 Jul.
10
Clinician Perspectives on Referring Medicaid Back Pain Patients to Integrative and Complementary Medicine: A Qualitative Study.
J Integr Complement Med. 2023 Jan;29(1):55-60. doi: 10.1089/jicm.2022.0600. Epub 2022 Sep 26.

本文引用的文献

1
LGBTQ bullying: a qualitative investigation of student and school health professional perspectives.
J LGBT Youth. 2020;17(3):280-297. doi: 10.1080/19361653.2019.1653808. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
2
Research in the Time of Coronavirus: Continuing Ongoing Studies in the Midst of the COVID-19 Pandemic.
AIDS Behav. 2020 Aug;24(8):2232-2235. doi: 10.1007/s10461-020-02868-4.
3
Transgender Youth Experiences and Perspectives Related to HIV Preventive Services.
Pediatrics. 2020 Apr;145(4). doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-2204. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
6
Perceptions of middle school youth about school bullying.
J Adolesc. 2019 Aug;75:175-187. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2018.10.008. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
9
Sensitive Health Topics With Underserved Patient Populations: Methodological Considerations for Online Focus Group Discussions.
Qual Health Res. 2018 Aug;28(10):1658-1673. doi: 10.1177/1049732317705355. Epub 2017 May 4.
10
Why Girls Choose Not to Use Barriers to Prevent Sexually Transmitted Infection During Female-to-Female Sex.
J Adolesc Health. 2018 Apr;62(4):411-416. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.10.005. Epub 2017 Dec 28.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验