• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于健康研究的异步在线焦点小组:案例研究与经验教训

Asynchronous Online Focus Groups for Health Research: Case Study and Lessons Learned.

作者信息

Gordon Allegra R, Calzo Jerel P, Eiduson Rose, Sharp Kendall, Silverstein Scout, Lopez Ethan, Thomson Katharine, Reisner Sari L

机构信息

Department of Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.

Division of Adolescent/Young Adults Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Int J Qual Methods. 2021 Jan-Dec;20. doi: 10.1177/1609406921990489. Epub 2021 Feb 9.

DOI:10.1177/1609406921990489
PMID:35185443
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8856649/
Abstract

Increasingly, social life-and accordingly, social research-is conducted in online environments. Asynchronous online focus groups (AOFGs) have emerged as an important tool to conduct remote research with geographically diverse populations. However, there remain few systematic accounts of AOFG methods to guide researchers' decision-making in designing and implementing studies. This paper seeks to address this gap by describing a recent study on body image and health among transgender and gender diverse (TGD) young adults. In this study, eight AOFGs were conducted in August-October 2019 with 66 TGD young adults residing in 25 U.S. states. Each AOFG lasted four consecutive days with two prompts posted by moderators per day. Overall, participant satisfaction with AOFGs was high: 98% reported their experience was excellent, very good, or good and 95% would be somewhat or very likely to sign up for another AOFG. This example is used to illustrate key methodological decision-points, acceptability of the method to participants, and lessons learned. The goal of this paper is to encourage other researchers, particularly health researchers, to consider using AOFGs and to engage with the method's strengths and limitations in order to develop new opportunities for online technologies to enrich the field of qualitative health research.

摘要

社交生活以及相应的社会研究越来越多地在网络环境中进行。异步在线焦点小组(AOFGs)已成为对地理分布广泛的人群进行远程研究的重要工具。然而,关于AOFG方法的系统性描述仍然很少,难以指导研究人员在设计和实施研究时做出决策。本文旨在通过描述一项关于跨性别和性别多样化(TGD)年轻人的身体形象与健康的近期研究来填补这一空白。在这项研究中,2019年8月至10月对居住在美国25个州的66名TGD年轻人进行了8个AOFG。每个AOFG持续四天,主持人每天发布两个提示。总体而言,参与者对AOFG的满意度很高:98%的人表示他们的体验很好、非常好或良好,95%的人表示有点或非常有可能报名参加另一个AOFG。这个例子用于说明关键的方法学决策点、该方法对参与者的可接受性以及所学到的经验教训。本文的目的是鼓励其他研究人员,特别是健康研究人员,考虑使用AOFG,并了解该方法的优缺点,以便为在线技术创造新机会,丰富定性健康研究领域。

相似文献

1
Asynchronous Online Focus Groups for Health Research: Case Study and Lessons Learned.用于健康研究的异步在线焦点小组:案例研究与经验教训
Int J Qual Methods. 2021 Jan-Dec;20. doi: 10.1177/1609406921990489. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
2
Asynchronous online focus groups for research with people living with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and family caregivers: usefulness, acceptability and lessons learned.肌萎缩侧索硬化症患者及其家属的异步在线焦点小组研究:有用性、可接受性和经验教训。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 Oct 6;23(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-02051-y.
3
Lessons Learned Designing and Using an Online Discussion Forum for Care Coordinators in Primary Care.为基层医疗护理协调员设计和使用在线讨论论坛的经验教训
Qual Health Res. 2016 Nov;26(13):1851-1861. doi: 10.1177/1049732315609567. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
4
HIV prevention and HIV care among transgender and gender diverse youth: design and implementation of a multisite mixed-methods study protocol in the U.S.HIV 预防和跨性别及性别多样化青年中的 HIV 护理:美国多地点混合方法研究方案的设计和实施
BMC Public Health. 2019 Nov 15;19(1):1531. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7605-4.
5
Sensitive Health Topics With Underserved Patient Populations: Methodological Considerations for Online Focus Group Discussions.服务不足患者群体的敏感健康话题:在线焦点小组讨论的方法学考虑。
Qual Health Res. 2018 Aug;28(10):1658-1673. doi: 10.1177/1049732317705355. Epub 2017 May 4.
6
Transgender and Gender Diverse Fertility Choices: Supporting the Decision-Making Process for Adolescents and Young Adults.跨性别和性别多样化的生育选择:支持青少年和年轻成年人的决策过程。
J Pediatr. 2022 Jan;240:256-264.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2021.10.013. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
7
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
8
Patient-centered practices for engaging transgender and gender diverse patients in clinical research studies.以患者为中心的实践,让跨性别和性别多样化的患者参与临床研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Oct 1;21(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01328-4.
9
Lessons learned using Web conference technology for online focus group interviews.使用网络会议技术进行在线焦点小组访谈的经验教训。
Qual Health Res. 2015 Jan;25(1):122-33. doi: 10.1177/1049732314549602. Epub 2014 Sep 5.
10
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.

引用本文的文献

1
Virtual Focus Groups on Zoom: "Lessons Learned" from Two Physical Activity Studies among Black and African American Women and Children.Zoom 上的虚拟焦点小组:两项针对黑人及非裔美国妇女和儿童的体育活动研究的“经验教训”
Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2025;28(2):209-220. doi: 10.1080/13645579.2024.2330050. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
2
Patient information needs for transparent and trustworthy cardiovascular artificial intelligence: A qualitative study.透明且可信的心血管人工智能所需的患者信息:一项定性研究。
PLOS Digit Health. 2025 Apr 21;4(4):e0000826. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000826. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
Are boarding secondary schools suitable for students with asthma? An asynchronous online focus group discussion among members of an asthma awareness group.

本文引用的文献

1
LGBTQ bullying: a qualitative investigation of student and school health professional perspectives.LGBTQ群体遭受的欺凌:对学生和学校健康专业人员观点的定性调查
J LGBT Youth. 2020;17(3):280-297. doi: 10.1080/19361653.2019.1653808. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
2
Research in the Time of Coronavirus: Continuing Ongoing Studies in the Midst of the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情时代的研究:在COVID-19大流行期间继续进行中的研究
AIDS Behav. 2020 Aug;24(8):2232-2235. doi: 10.1007/s10461-020-02868-4.
3
Transgender Youth Experiences and Perspectives Related to HIV Preventive Services.
boarding 学校是否适合哮喘学生?哮喘意识组织成员之间的异步在线焦点小组讨论。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 6;19(9):e0304123. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304123. eCollection 2024.
4
"There is a paywall to my happiness": the influence of socioeconomic determinants on transgender and gender diverse young adults' experiences with eating disorders.“我的幸福有一道付费墙”:社会经济决定因素对跨性别和性别多样化的年轻人饮食失调经历的影响。
Eat Disord. 2025 Jan-Feb;33(1):100-119. doi: 10.1080/10640266.2024.2381908. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
5
"It Has Improved My Practice to Be Able to Offer Alternative Treatments": A Longitudinal Qualitative Study of Oregon Medicaid Back Pain Providers.“能够提供替代疗法改善了我的实践”:俄勒冈州医疗补助计划下腰痛提供者的纵向定性研究。
J Integr Complement Med. 2024 Nov;30(11):1092-1101. doi: 10.1089/jicm.2023.0743. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
6
Understanding health care pathways of patients with sepsis: protocol of a mixed-methods analysis of health care utilization, experiences, and needs of patients with and after sepsis.了解脓毒症患者的医疗路径:一项混合方法分析脓毒症患者及其后医疗利用、体验和需求的研究方案。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jan 8;24(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10509-4.
7
Asynchronous online focus groups for research with people living with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and family caregivers: usefulness, acceptability and lessons learned.肌萎缩侧索硬化症患者及其家属的异步在线焦点小组研究:有用性、可接受性和经验教训。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 Oct 6;23(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-02051-y.
8
'They've all endorsed it…but I'm just not there:' a qualitative exploration of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy reported by Black and Latinx individuals.“他们都支持它……但我就是不那么想:”对黑人和拉丁裔个体报告的 COVID-19 疫苗犹豫进行的定性探索。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 20;13(7):e072619. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072619.
9
Exploring gender differences in uptake of GP partnership roles: a qualitative mixed-methods study.探讨性别差异对全科医生合伙角色的影响:一项定性混合方法研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2023 Jun 29;73(732):e545-e555. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2022.0544. Print 2023 Jul.
10
Clinician Perspectives on Referring Medicaid Back Pain Patients to Integrative and Complementary Medicine: A Qualitative Study.临床医生对将医疗补助腰痛患者转介至综合与补充医学的看法:一项定性研究。
J Integr Complement Med. 2023 Jan;29(1):55-60. doi: 10.1089/jicm.2022.0600. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
跨性别青年与 HIV 预防服务相关的经历和观点。
Pediatrics. 2020 Apr;145(4). doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-2204. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
4
'It all dials back to safety': A qualitative study of social and economic vulnerabilities among transgender women participating in HIV research in the USA.“这一切都可以追溯到安全问题”:美国参与 HIV 研究的跨性别女性的社会和经济脆弱性的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jan 19;10(1):e029852. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029852.
5
Computer-Mediated Communication to Facilitate Synchronous Online Focus Group Discussions: Feasibility Study for Qualitative HIV Research Among Transgender Women Across the United States.通过计算机媒介通信促进同步在线焦点小组讨论:美国跨性别女性定性艾滋病病毒研究的可行性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Mar 29;21(3):e12569. doi: 10.2196/12569.
6
Perceptions of middle school youth about school bullying.中学生对校园欺凌的看法。
J Adolesc. 2019 Aug;75:175-187. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2018.10.008. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
7
Feasibility of Synchronous Online Focus Groups of Rural Breast Cancer Survivors on Web-Based Distress Self-Management.基于网络的痛苦自我管理的农村乳腺癌幸存者同步在线焦点小组的可行性
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2018 Nov 1;45(6):E111-E124. doi: 10.1188/18.ONF.E111-E124.
8
Self-Management Support and eHealth When Managing Changes in Behavior and Mood of a Relative With Dementia: An Asynchronous Online Focus Group Study of Family Caregivers' Needs.管理痴呆症亲属行为和情绪变化时的自我管理支持与电子健康:一项针对家庭照顾者需求的异步在线焦点小组研究
Res Gerontol Nurs. 2018 May 1;11(3):151-159. doi: 10.3928/19404921-20180216-01. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
9
Sensitive Health Topics With Underserved Patient Populations: Methodological Considerations for Online Focus Group Discussions.服务不足患者群体的敏感健康话题:在线焦点小组讨论的方法学考虑。
Qual Health Res. 2018 Aug;28(10):1658-1673. doi: 10.1177/1049732317705355. Epub 2017 May 4.
10
Why Girls Choose Not to Use Barriers to Prevent Sexually Transmitted Infection During Female-to-Female Sex.为什么女孩在女女性行为中选择不使用屏障来预防性传播感染。
J Adolesc Health. 2018 Apr;62(4):411-416. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.10.005. Epub 2017 Dec 28.