Department of Chemistry, University of Arkansas at Little Rock, Little Rock, Arkansas 72204, United States.
Department of Biology, University of Arkansas at Little Rock, Little Rock, Arkansas 72204, United States.
ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2024 Aug 19;7(8):5359-5368. doi: 10.1021/acsabm.4c00552. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
We have studied the endocytic mechanisms that determine subcellular localization for three carrier-free chemotherapeutic-photothermal (chemo-PTT) combination ionic nanomedicines (INMs) composed of doxorubicin (DOX) and an near-infrared (NIR) dye (ICG, IR820, or IR783). This study aims to understand the cellular basis for previously published enhanced toxicity results of these combination nanomedicines toward MCF-7 breast cancer cells. The active transport mechanism of INMs, unlike free DOX, which is known to employ passive transport, was validated by conducting temperature-dependent cellular uptake of the drug in MCF-7 cells using confocal microscopy. The internalization pathway of these INMs was further probed in the presence and absence of different endocytosis inhibitors. Detailed examination of the mode of entry of the carrier-free INMs in MCF-7 cells revealed that they are primarily internalized through clathrin-mediated endocytosis. In addition, time-dependent subcellular localization studies were also investigated. Examination of time-dependent confocal images indicated that the INMs targeted multiple organelles, in contrast to free DOX that primarily targets the nucleus. Collectively, the high cellular endocytic uptake in cancerous cells (EPR effect) and the multimode targeting ability demonstrated the main reason for the low half-maxima inhibitory concentration (IC) value (the high cytotoxicity) of these carrier-free INMs as compared to their respective parent chemo and PTT drugs.
我们研究了三种无载体化疗-光热(chemo-PTT)组合离子纳米药物(INMs)的内吞机制,这些 INMs 由阿霉素(DOX)和近红外(NIR)染料(ICG、IR820 或 IR783)组成。本研究旨在了解先前发表的这些组合纳米药物对 MCF-7 乳腺癌细胞增强毒性的细胞基础。与已知采用被动转运的游离 DOX 不同,INMs 的主动转运机制通过使用共聚焦显微镜在 MCF-7 细胞中进行温度依赖性药物细胞摄取来验证。还在存在和不存在不同内吞作用抑制剂的情况下进一步探测了这些 INMs 的内化途径。详细检查了无载体 INMs 在 MCF-7 细胞中的进入模式,结果表明它们主要通过网格蛋白介导的内吞作用内化。此外,还研究了时间依赖性亚细胞定位。对时间依赖性共聚焦图像的检查表明,与主要靶向细胞核的游离 DOX 相比,INMs 靶向多个细胞器。总之,癌细胞中的高细胞内内吞摄取(EPR 效应)和多模式靶向能力是这些无载体 INMs 与各自母体化疗和 PTT 药物相比,半最大抑制浓度(IC)值(高细胞毒性)较低的主要原因。