Kelly E. Anderson (
Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2024 Aug;43(8):1137-1146. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2024.00118.
Nearly all patients with type 1 diabetes and 20-30 percent of patients with type 2 diabetes use insulin to manage glycemic control. Approximately one-quarter of patients who use insulin report underuse because of cost. In response, more than twenty states have implemented monthly caps on insulin out-of-pocket spending, ranging from $25 to $100. Using a difference-in-differences approach, this study evaluated whether state-level caps on insulin out-of-pocket spending change insulin usage among commercially insured enrollees. The study included 33,134 people ages 18-64 who had type 1 diabetes or who used insulin to manage type 2 diabetes with commercial insurance coverage that was subject to state-level oversight and was included in the 25 percent sample of the IQVIA PharMetrics database during 2018-21. Insulin out-of-pocket caps did not significantly increase quarterly insulin claims for enrollees who had type 1 diabetes or who used insulin to manage type 2 diabetes. State-level caps on insulin out-of-pocket spending for commercial enrollees did not significantly increase insulin use; that may be in part because of out-of-pocket expenses being lower than cap amounts.
几乎所有 1 型糖尿病患者和 20-30%的 2 型糖尿病患者都使用胰岛素来控制血糖。大约有四分之一使用胰岛素的患者因费用问题而未能充分使用胰岛素。对此,二十多个州已经实施了胰岛素自付费用的月度上限,从 25 美元到 100 美元不等。本研究采用双重差分法,评估了州级胰岛素自付费用上限是否会改变商业保险覆盖的 18-64 岁 1 型糖尿病或使用胰岛素治疗 2 型糖尿病患者的胰岛素使用情况。该研究纳入了 33134 名年龄在 18-64 岁之间、有商业保险覆盖并受州级监管的 1 型糖尿病或使用胰岛素治疗 2 型糖尿病的患者,这些患者来自 IQVIA PharMetrics 数据库的 25%样本,时间为 2018-21 年。州级胰岛素自付费用上限并未显著增加 1 型糖尿病或使用胰岛素治疗 2 型糖尿病患者的季度胰岛素报销额。商业参保者的胰岛素自付费用上限并未显著增加胰岛素的使用;这可能部分是因为自付费用低于上限金额。