Saeedi Saeed, Ghorbani Somayeh, Rong Panying
Independent Researcher in Laryngology, Voice Pathology, and Speech-Language Pathology, Tehran, Iran.
Cancer Research Center, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2024 Aug 5:1-14. doi: 10.1044/2024_AJSLP-24-00043.
The perception of a clinical condition or disorder can vary across patients from different cultural-linguistic backgrounds. There is insufficient evidence to inspect this potential impact on the perception of vocal fatigue (VF) as a common condition perceived by patients with voice disorders. In order to more comprehensively explore this phenomenon, a systematic review was carried out to investigate the differences in perceived VF in a variety of cultural-linguistic contexts, based on a standard self-assessment instrument-the Vocal Fatigue Index (VFI), as translated in different languages.
A thorough search was done in MEDLINE, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Google Scholar by March 2024. Cross-sectional studies investigating the accuracy of the VFI to detect perceived VF in all available languages were considered. The VFI has three distinct parts or factors assessing: (a) tiredness of voice, (b) physical discomfort associated with voicing, and (c) improvement of symptoms with rest. The cutoff points and sensitivity and specificity of each factor were submitted to meta-analysis, and the summary receiver operating characteristic curves were used to determine pooled sensitivity and specificity of each factor of the VFI.
Eight papers that examined the diagnostic accuracy of the VFI in English, Malayalam, Turkish, German, Mandarin Chinese, Polish, Cantonese, and Finnish languages were identified as being eligible for this meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity along with their confidence intervals (CIs) were as follows: 0.91 CI [0.80, 0.96] and 0.88 CI [0.78, 0.94] for Factor 1, 0.83 CI [0.69, 0.91] and 0.84 CI [0.76, 0.89] for Factor 2, and 0.75 CI [0.67, 0.82] and 0.77 CI [0.59, 0.89] for Factor 3.
The present research demonstrates medium to high but heterogeneous accuracy of the VFI for detecting perceived VF across cultural-linguistic contexts. Given the promising results, future studies should focus on (a) further investigating the underlying factors for the observed heterogeneity in diagnostic accuracy and (b) adapting and validating the VFI in more languages toward establishing its validity as a cross-linguistic diagnostic tool for the perception of VF.
不同文化语言背景的患者对临床状况或疾病的认知可能存在差异。目前尚无足够证据考察这种差异对嗓音疲劳(VF)认知的潜在影响,嗓音疲劳是嗓音障碍患者普遍感知到的一种状况。为了更全面地探究这一现象,我们基于一种标准的自我评估工具——不同语言版本的嗓音疲劳指数(VFI),进行了一项系统综述,以调查在各种文化语言背景下对嗓音疲劳感知的差异。
截至2024年3月,我们在MEDLINE、CENTRAL、科学网和谷歌学术上进行了全面检索。纳入调查VFI在所有可用语言中检测嗓音疲劳感知准确性的横断面研究。VFI有三个不同部分或因素,分别评估:(a)嗓音疲劳感,(b)发声相关的身体不适,(c)休息后症状改善情况。对每个因素的截断点、敏感性和特异性进行荟萃分析,并使用汇总受试者工作特征曲线来确定VFI各因素的合并敏感性和特异性。
八篇研究VFI在英语、马拉雅拉姆语、土耳其语、德语、汉语普通话、波兰语、粤语和芬兰语中诊断准确性的论文被确定符合本次荟萃分析的要求。各因素的合并敏感性、特异性及其置信区间(CI)如下:因素1为0.91 CI [0.80, 0.96]和0.88 CI [0.78, 0.94],因素2为0.83 CI [0.69, 0.91]和0.84 CI [0.76, 0.89],因素3为0.75 CI [0.67, 0.82]和0.77 CI [0.59, 0.89]。
本研究表明,VFI在不同文化语言背景下检测嗓音疲劳感知的准确性为中等至高,但存在异质性。鉴于这些有前景的结果,未来的研究应聚焦于:(a)进一步探究观察到的诊断准确性异质性的潜在因素;(b)对更多语言版本的VFI进行调整和验证,以确立其作为跨语言嗓音疲劳感知诊断工具的有效性。