• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《联盟:以人本主义为导向的儿童焦虑症社会机器人发展方法》

The League: A person-centred approach to the development of social robotics for paediatric anxiety.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of Neurology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

British Columbia Children & Women's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2024 Feb;27(1):e13981. doi: 10.1111/hex.13981.

DOI:10.1111/hex.13981
PMID:39102709
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10821745/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Social robots are promising tools to improve the quality of life of children and youth living with anxiety and should be developed based on the priorities of end users. However, pathways to include young people in patient-oriented research, particularly in the overlap between technology and mental health, have been historically limited.

OBJECTIVE

In this work, we describe engagement with experts with lived experiences of paediatric anxiety in a social robotics research programme. We report the experiences of patient advisors in a co-creation process and identify considerations for other research groups looking to involve end users in technology development in the field of youth mental health.

DESIGN

We engaged individuals with a lived experience of paediatric anxiety (current, recent past, or from a parent perspective) using three different models over the course of three years. Two initial patient partners were involved during project development, eight were engaged as part of an advisory panel ('the League') during study development and data analysis and four contributed as ongoing collaborators in an advisory role. League members completed a preparticipation expectation survey and a postparticipation experience survey.

FINDINGS

Eight individuals from a range of anxiety-related diagnostic groups participated in the League as patient partners. Members were teenagers (n = 3), young adults aged 22-26 years who had connected with a youth mental health service as children within the past eight years (n = 3) or parents of children presently living with anxiety (n = 2). Preferred methods of communication, expectations and reasons for participating were collected. The League provided specific and actionable feedback on the design of workshops on the topic of social robotics, which was implemented. They reported that their experiences were positive and fairly compensated, but communication and sustained engagement over time were challenges. Issues of ethics and language related to patient-centred brain health technology research are discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

There is an ethical imperative to meaningfully incorporate the voices of youth and young adults with psychiatric conditions in the development of devices intended to support their mental health and quality of life.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

Six young people and two parents with lived experiences of paediatric anxiety participated in all stages of developing a research programme on social robotics to support paediatric mental health in a community context. They also provided input during the preparation of this manuscript.

摘要

背景

社交机器人是提高患有焦虑症的儿童和青少年生活质量的有前途的工具,应根据最终用户的优先级进行开发。然而,让年轻人参与以患者为中心的研究,特别是在技术和心理健康交叉领域的研究,在历史上一直受到限制。

目的

在这项工作中,我们描述了与具有儿科焦虑症患者经历的专家在社交机器人研究计划中的合作。我们报告了患者顾问在共同创作过程中的经验,并确定了其他研究小组在涉及青年心理健康领域的技术开发中让最终用户参与的考虑因素。

设计

我们使用三种不同的模式在三年内与具有儿科焦虑症患者经历的个人(目前、最近或从父母的角度)进行合作。两名最初的患者合作伙伴在项目开发过程中参与,八名合作伙伴作为研究开发和数据分析期间的顾问小组(“联盟”)的一部分参与,四名合作伙伴作为持续顾问以顾问身份参与。联盟成员完成了参与前期望调查和参与后经验调查。

结果

来自一系列与焦虑相关的诊断群体的八名个人作为患者合作伙伴参与了联盟。成员是青少年(n=3)、22-26 岁的年轻人,他们在过去八年内在青年心理健康服务机构就诊过(n=3)或孩子目前患有焦虑症的父母(n=2)。收集了他们的沟通偏好、期望和参与原因。联盟就社交机器人主题的研讨会设计提供了具体和可操作的反馈,这些反馈被实施了。他们报告说他们的经历是积极的,并且得到了相当的补偿,但沟通和随着时间的推移的持续参与是挑战。讨论了与以患者为中心的大脑健康技术研究相关的伦理和语言问题。

结论

在开发旨在支持儿童和青少年心理健康和生活质量的设备时,从患有精神疾病的年轻人和年轻人那里获得有意义的意见具有伦理必要性。

患者或公众贡献

六名有儿科焦虑症患者经历的年轻人和两名父母参与了社交机器人研究计划的所有阶段的开发,以在社区环境中支持儿科心理健康。他们还在准备这份手稿的过程中提供了意见。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f88/10821745/2355d3979890/HEX-27-e13981-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f88/10821745/2355d3979890/HEX-27-e13981-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f88/10821745/2355d3979890/HEX-27-e13981-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The League: A person-centred approach to the development of social robotics for paediatric anxiety.《联盟:以人本主义为导向的儿童焦虑症社会机器人发展方法》
Health Expect. 2024 Feb;27(1):e13981. doi: 10.1111/hex.13981.
2
An intervention to improve the quality of life in children of parents with serious mental illness: the Young SMILES feasibility RCT.改善严重精神疾病父母子女生活质量的干预措施:Young SMILES 可行性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Nov;24(59):1-136. doi: 10.3310/hta24590.
3
An Application of Evidence-Based Approaches to Engage Young People in the Design of a Global Mental Health Databank.循证方法在全球精神卫生数据库设计中吸引年轻人参与的应用。
Health Expect. 2024 Oct;27(5):e14172. doi: 10.1111/hex.14172.
4
The INSCHOOL project: showcasing participatory qualitative methods derived from patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) work with young people with long-term health conditions.INSCHOOL项目:展示源自患者及公众参与(PPIE)工作的参与式定性方法,该工作针对患有长期健康状况的年轻人开展。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Oct 12;9(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00496-5.
5
Right care, first time: a highly personalised and measurement-based care model to manage youth mental health.精准医疗,首次就诊:高度个性化和基于评估的青少年心理健康管理医疗模式。
Med J Aust. 2019 Nov;211 Suppl 9:S3-S46. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50383.
6
Structured, intensive education maximising engagement, motivation and long-term change for children and young people with diabetes: a cluster randomised controlled trial with integral process and economic evaluation - the CASCADE study.结构化、强化教育最大限度地提高糖尿病患儿和青少年的参与度、积极性和长期改变:一项具有整体过程和经济评估的群组随机对照试验 - CASCADE 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Mar;18(20):1-202. doi: 10.3310/hta18200.
7
Development and evaluation of a parent advisory group to inform a research program for knowledge translation in child health.组建并评估一个家长咨询小组,以为儿童健康知识转化研究项目提供信息。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Jun 7;7(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00280-3.
8
Involving carer advisors in evidence synthesis to improve carers' mental health during end-of-life home care: co-production during COVID-19 remote working.让护理顾问参与证据综合工作以改善临终居家护理期间护理人员的心理健康:新冠疫情远程工作期间的共同制作。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Oct;13(8):1-48. doi: 10.3310/TGHH6428.
9
Cognitive therapy compared with CBT for social anxiety disorder in adolescents: a feasibility study.认知疗法与认知行为疗法治疗青少年社交焦虑障碍的比较:一项可行性研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Mar;25(20):1-94. doi: 10.3310/hta25200.
10
Youth and family involvement in the development of a plain language trial results communication tool: CommuniKIDS.青少年及家庭参与简明语言试验结果沟通工具CommuniKIDS的开发
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Sep 30;9(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00499-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Making Room for Every Voice: Reimagining Person-Centred Care in the Neurosciences.为每一种声音留出空间:重塑神经科学中的以人为本的护理
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70350. doi: 10.1111/hex.70350.

本文引用的文献

1
Social robotics for children: an investigation of manufacturers' claims.面向儿童的社交机器人:对制造商宣称的调查。
Front Robot AI. 2023 Dec 19;10:1080157. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2023.1080157. eCollection 2023.
2
Strengthening mental health research outcomes through genuine partnerships with young people with lived or living experience: A pilot evaluation study.通过与有过或正在经历精神健康问题的年轻人建立真正的伙伴关系,加强精神健康研究成果:一项试点评估研究。
Health Expect. 2023 Aug;26(4):1703-1715. doi: 10.1111/hex.13777. Epub 2023 May 17.
3
Lived experience engagement in mental health research: Recommendations for a terminology shift.
精神卫生研究中的生活经历参与:术语转变建议
Health Expect. 2023 Aug;26(4):1381-1383. doi: 10.1111/hex.13775. Epub 2023 May 11.
4
Reflecting on the Past and Future of Neuroethics: The Brain on a Pedestal.反思神经伦理学的过去与未来:置于神坛的大脑
AJOB Neurosci. 2023 Jul-Sep;14(3):223-226. doi: 10.1080/21507740.2023.2188282. Epub 2023 Mar 31.
5
Older adult perspectives on emotion and stigma in social robots.老年人对社交机器人中情感与污名的看法。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Jan 12;13:1051750. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1051750. eCollection 2022.
6
The experience of patient partners in research: a qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis.患者伙伴参与研究的经历:一项定性系统评价与主题综合分析
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Oct 3;8(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00388-0.
7
The Impact of Patient and Family Engagement in Child Health Research: A Scoping Review.患者及家庭参与儿童健康研究的影响:一项范围综述
J Pediatr. 2023 Feb;253:115-128. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2022.09.030. Epub 2022 Sep 27.
8
User perspectives on emotionally aligned social robots for older adults and persons living with dementia.老年人及痴呆症患者对情感契合的社交机器人的用户观点。
J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng. 2022 Jun 22;9:20556683221108364. doi: 10.1177/20556683221108364. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
9
Connecting the Dots of Social Robot Design From Interviews With Robot Creators.通过与机器人创造者的访谈梳理社交机器人设计要点
Front Robot AI. 2022 Jun 2;9:720799. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2022.720799. eCollection 2022.
10
Meaningful patient and public involvement in digital health innovation, implementation and evaluation: A systematic review.有意义的患者和公众参与数字健康创新、实施和评估:系统评价。
Health Expect. 2022 Aug;25(4):1232-1245. doi: 10.1111/hex.13506. Epub 2022 May 8.