Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, 81 Irwon-ro Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, South Korea.
Division of Hematology & Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Ann Hematol. 2024 Sep;103(9):3615-3625. doi: 10.1007/s00277-024-05907-5. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
Due to the lack of treatment guidelines for the management of advanced-stage marginal zone lymphoma (MZL), only one chemoimmunotherapy-cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone plus rituximab (R-CVP)-is reimbursed in the first-line setting in South Korea. The aim of this study was to develop a consensus-based recommendation for the treatment of patients with advanced-stage MZL. Twelve hematologist oncologists participated in a two-round Delphi process to identify consensus on the management of patients with advanced-stage MZL in South Korea. Physicians rated their level of agreement with each statement on a four-point Likert scale. Statements were divided into two sections: definitions used in clinical practice and clinical management of patients with advanced-stage MZL. Consensus was reached for 23 of 33 (69.7%) and 5 of 13 statements (38.5%) in rounds 1 and 2, respectively. There was strong consensus (91.7%) that advanced-stage MZL subtypes are defined according to the Lugano staging system. First-line systemic treatment should be prescribed for patients with symptomatic advanced-stage MZL. Although there was unanimous agreement that R-CVP is the standard first-line treatment for advanced-stage MZL, physicians also agreed that bendamustine with rituximab (BR) has greater efficacy than R-CVP as first-line treatment (91.7%). For the treatment of relapsed/refractory advanced-stage MZL, BR and R-CVP can be repeated in patients with short (< 24 months) and long remission periods (≥ 24 months), respectively. This study provides insights on the management of patients with advanced-stage MZL in South Korea. This may enhance clinical decision-making, thus improving patient outcomes.
由于缺乏晚期边缘区淋巴瘤(MZL)管理的治疗指南,在韩国,一线治疗仅报销一种化疗免疫疗法——环磷酰胺、长春新碱和泼尼松加利妥昔单抗(R-CVP)。本研究旨在为韩国晚期 MZL 患者的治疗制定基于共识的建议。12 名血液肿瘤学家参与了两轮 Delphi 流程,以确定韩国晚期 MZL 患者管理的共识。医生们对每个陈述在 4 分制的李克特量表上的同意程度进行评分。陈述分为两部分:临床实践中使用的定义和晚期 MZL 患者的临床管理。在第 1 轮和第 2 轮中,分别有 23 项(69.7%)和 5 项(38.5%)达成共识。强烈一致(91.7%)认为,晚期 MZL 亚型根据卢加诺分期系统定义。对于有症状的晚期 MZL 患者,应规定一线系统治疗。尽管一致认为 R-CVP 是晚期 MZL 的标准一线治疗,但医生们也同意,与 R-CVP 相比,苯达莫司汀联合利妥昔单抗(BR)作为一线治疗具有更高的疗效(91.7%)。对于复发性/难治性晚期 MZL,BR 和 R-CVP 可分别在缓解期较短(<24 个月)和较长(≥24 个月)的患者中重复使用。本研究提供了韩国晚期 MZL 患者管理的见解。这可能会增强临床决策能力,从而改善患者的预后。