Suppr超能文献

全球卫生安全框架能否衡量西非的“同一健康”实施情况?一项混合方法研究。

Can global health security frameworks measure One Health implementation in West Africa?A mixed-methods study.

机构信息

Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

Department of Epidemiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 5;24(1):2113. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19617-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The 2014 outbreak of the Ebola virus disease highlighted the importance of overhauling and transforming healthcare systems in West Africa to improve the ability of individual countries to deal with infectious diseases. As part of this effort, in November 2016 the West African Health Organization (WAHO) began the process of institutionalizing the One Health (OH) approach to health security across the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS). The lack of clear metrics and evaluation frameworks to measure the progress of OH implementation in West Africa has been reported as a challenge. Therefore, this study sought to assess and explore whether the existing metrics of global health security frameworks can measure the successful implementation of OH activities, evaluate the progress made since 2016, and identify key areas for improvement in the region.

METHOD

The study employed predetermined keywords to select indicators from the International Health Regulations (IHR) Monitoring Frameworks, specifically the State Party Self-Assessment Annual Report (SPAR) and Joint External Evaluation (JEE), deemed relevant to the OH approach. In addition, the COVID-19 performance index scores (severity and recovery) for June 2022 were extracted from the Global COVID-19 Index (GCI). The GCI Recovery Index evaluated the major recovery parameters reported daily to indicate how a country performed on the path to recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic compared to other countries. National documents were also analyzed using categorical variables to assess the performance status of OH platforms across implementing countries. A quantitative analysis of these indicators was conducted and supplemented with qualitative data gathered through interviews with key stakeholders. Between March and April 2022, we conducted 18 key informant interviews with purposively selected representatives from regional governmental agencies and international multilateral agencies, including ECOWAS member states. Interviews were conducted online, transcribed, and analysed following the tenets of thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Our quantitative analysis revealed no significant association between the implementation status of OH activities and any of the selected indicators from SPAR and JEE. The descriptive analysis of the JEE scores at the country level revealed that countries with existing OH platforms scored relatively higher on the selected JEE indicators than other countries in the pre-implementation stage. OH implementation status did not significantly affect COVID-19 recovery and severity indices. The qualitative findings with relevant stakeholders revealed noteworthy challenges related to insufficient human capacity, inadequate coordination, and a lack of government funding for the sustainability of OH initiatives. Nonetheless, countries in the ECOWAS region are making progress toward the integration of OH into their health security systems.

CONCLUSION

Standardized metrics were used to assess the implementation and efficacy of OH systems in the ECOWAS region. Current indicators for monitoring global health security frameworks lack specificity and fail to comprehensively capture essential OH components, particularly at the sub-national level. To ensure consistency and effectiveness across countries, OH implementation metrics that align with global frameworks such as IHR should be developed.

摘要

背景

2014 年爆发的埃博拉病毒病凸显了彻底改革和转变西非卫生系统的重要性,以提高各国应对传染病的能力。作为这一努力的一部分,2016 年 11 月,西非卫生组织(WAHO)开始在西非国家经济共同体(ECOWAS)内将“同一健康”(OH)方法制度化,以确保卫生安全。据报道,缺乏明确的衡量标准和评估框架来衡量西非 OH 实施的进展情况是一个挑战。因此,本研究旨在评估和探讨现有的全球卫生安全框架衡量标准是否可以衡量 OH 活动的成功实施情况,评估自 2016 年以来取得的进展,并确定该地区的改进重点领域。

方法

该研究使用预定的关键词从《国际卫生条例》(IHR)监测框架中选择指标,特别是国家自评年度报告(SPAR)和联合外部评估(JEE),认为这些指标与 OH 方法相关。此外,还从全球 COVID-19 指数(GCI)中提取了 2022 年 6 月的 COVID-19 绩效指数(严重程度和恢复程度)得分。GCI 恢复指数评估了每日报告的主要恢复参数,以表明与其他国家相比,一个国家在从 COVID-19 大流行中恢复的道路上表现如何。还使用分类变量分析国家文件,以评估实施国家 OH 平台的绩效状况。对这些指标进行了定量分析,并辅以通过与主要利益攸关方进行访谈收集的定性数据。2022 年 3 月至 4 月期间,我们对来自区域政府机构和国际多边机构的 18 名有针对性选择的代表进行了 18 次关键知情人访谈,其中包括西非经共体成员国。访谈通过网络进行,转录后按照主题分析的原则进行分析。

结果

我们的定量分析表明,OH 活动的实施状况与 SPAR 和 JEE 中选择的任何指标之间均无显著关联。国家一级 JEE 分数的描述性分析表明,在实施前阶段,拥有现有 OH 平台的国家在所选 JEE 指标上的得分相对较高。OH 实施状况并未对 COVID-19 恢复和严重程度指数产生显著影响。与相关利益攸关方的定性调查结果揭示了与人力资源不足、协调不力以及缺乏政府资金用于 OH 倡议的可持续性等相关的重大挑战。尽管如此,西非经共体区域内的国家在将 OH 纳入其卫生安全系统方面正在取得进展。

结论

使用标准化指标来评估西非经共体区域内 OH 系统的实施和效果。目前用于监测全球卫生安全框架的指标缺乏特异性,无法全面捕捉 OH 的基本组成部分,尤其是在国家以下一级。为了确保各国之间的一致性和有效性,应制定与《国际卫生条例》等全球框架保持一致的 OH 实施衡量标准。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70d7/11299367/53583e15ffea/12889_2024_19617_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验