• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全球卫生安全框架能否衡量西非的“同一健康”实施情况?一项混合方法研究。

Can global health security frameworks measure One Health implementation in West Africa?A mixed-methods study.

机构信息

Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

Department of Epidemiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 5;24(1):2113. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19617-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-024-19617-0
PMID:39103806
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11299367/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The 2014 outbreak of the Ebola virus disease highlighted the importance of overhauling and transforming healthcare systems in West Africa to improve the ability of individual countries to deal with infectious diseases. As part of this effort, in November 2016 the West African Health Organization (WAHO) began the process of institutionalizing the One Health (OH) approach to health security across the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS). The lack of clear metrics and evaluation frameworks to measure the progress of OH implementation in West Africa has been reported as a challenge. Therefore, this study sought to assess and explore whether the existing metrics of global health security frameworks can measure the successful implementation of OH activities, evaluate the progress made since 2016, and identify key areas for improvement in the region.

METHOD

The study employed predetermined keywords to select indicators from the International Health Regulations (IHR) Monitoring Frameworks, specifically the State Party Self-Assessment Annual Report (SPAR) and Joint External Evaluation (JEE), deemed relevant to the OH approach. In addition, the COVID-19 performance index scores (severity and recovery) for June 2022 were extracted from the Global COVID-19 Index (GCI). The GCI Recovery Index evaluated the major recovery parameters reported daily to indicate how a country performed on the path to recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic compared to other countries. National documents were also analyzed using categorical variables to assess the performance status of OH platforms across implementing countries. A quantitative analysis of these indicators was conducted and supplemented with qualitative data gathered through interviews with key stakeholders. Between March and April 2022, we conducted 18 key informant interviews with purposively selected representatives from regional governmental agencies and international multilateral agencies, including ECOWAS member states. Interviews were conducted online, transcribed, and analysed following the tenets of thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Our quantitative analysis revealed no significant association between the implementation status of OH activities and any of the selected indicators from SPAR and JEE. The descriptive analysis of the JEE scores at the country level revealed that countries with existing OH platforms scored relatively higher on the selected JEE indicators than other countries in the pre-implementation stage. OH implementation status did not significantly affect COVID-19 recovery and severity indices. The qualitative findings with relevant stakeholders revealed noteworthy challenges related to insufficient human capacity, inadequate coordination, and a lack of government funding for the sustainability of OH initiatives. Nonetheless, countries in the ECOWAS region are making progress toward the integration of OH into their health security systems.

CONCLUSION

Standardized metrics were used to assess the implementation and efficacy of OH systems in the ECOWAS region. Current indicators for monitoring global health security frameworks lack specificity and fail to comprehensively capture essential OH components, particularly at the sub-national level. To ensure consistency and effectiveness across countries, OH implementation metrics that align with global frameworks such as IHR should be developed.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70d7/11299367/7065f849cbed/12889_2024_19617_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70d7/11299367/53583e15ffea/12889_2024_19617_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70d7/11299367/190dd92e695e/12889_2024_19617_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70d7/11299367/7065f849cbed/12889_2024_19617_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70d7/11299367/53583e15ffea/12889_2024_19617_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70d7/11299367/190dd92e695e/12889_2024_19617_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70d7/11299367/7065f849cbed/12889_2024_19617_Fig3_HTML.jpg
摘要

背景

2014 年爆发的埃博拉病毒病凸显了彻底改革和转变西非卫生系统的重要性,以提高各国应对传染病的能力。作为这一努力的一部分,2016 年 11 月,西非卫生组织(WAHO)开始在西非国家经济共同体(ECOWAS)内将“同一健康”(OH)方法制度化,以确保卫生安全。据报道,缺乏明确的衡量标准和评估框架来衡量西非 OH 实施的进展情况是一个挑战。因此,本研究旨在评估和探讨现有的全球卫生安全框架衡量标准是否可以衡量 OH 活动的成功实施情况,评估自 2016 年以来取得的进展,并确定该地区的改进重点领域。

方法

该研究使用预定的关键词从《国际卫生条例》(IHR)监测框架中选择指标,特别是国家自评年度报告(SPAR)和联合外部评估(JEE),认为这些指标与 OH 方法相关。此外,还从全球 COVID-19 指数(GCI)中提取了 2022 年 6 月的 COVID-19 绩效指数(严重程度和恢复程度)得分。GCI 恢复指数评估了每日报告的主要恢复参数,以表明与其他国家相比,一个国家在从 COVID-19 大流行中恢复的道路上表现如何。还使用分类变量分析国家文件,以评估实施国家 OH 平台的绩效状况。对这些指标进行了定量分析,并辅以通过与主要利益攸关方进行访谈收集的定性数据。2022 年 3 月至 4 月期间,我们对来自区域政府机构和国际多边机构的 18 名有针对性选择的代表进行了 18 次关键知情人访谈,其中包括西非经共体成员国。访谈通过网络进行,转录后按照主题分析的原则进行分析。

结果

我们的定量分析表明,OH 活动的实施状况与 SPAR 和 JEE 中选择的任何指标之间均无显著关联。国家一级 JEE 分数的描述性分析表明,在实施前阶段,拥有现有 OH 平台的国家在所选 JEE 指标上的得分相对较高。OH 实施状况并未对 COVID-19 恢复和严重程度指数产生显著影响。与相关利益攸关方的定性调查结果揭示了与人力资源不足、协调不力以及缺乏政府资金用于 OH 倡议的可持续性等相关的重大挑战。尽管如此,西非经共体区域内的国家在将 OH 纳入其卫生安全系统方面正在取得进展。

结论

使用标准化指标来评估西非经共体区域内 OH 系统的实施和效果。目前用于监测全球卫生安全框架的指标缺乏特异性,无法全面捕捉 OH 的基本组成部分,尤其是在国家以下一级。为了确保各国之间的一致性和有效性,应制定与《国际卫生条例》等全球框架保持一致的 OH 实施衡量标准。

相似文献

1
Can global health security frameworks measure One Health implementation in West Africa?A mixed-methods study.全球卫生安全框架能否衡量西非的“同一健康”实施情况?一项混合方法研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 5;24(1):2113. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19617-0.
2
An ecological study on the association between International Health Regulations (IHR) core capacity scores and the Universal Health Coverage (UHC) service coverage index.国际卫生条例(IHR)核心能力评分与全民健康覆盖(UHC)服务覆盖指数之间关联的生态研究。
Global Health. 2022 Feb 8;18(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12992-022-00808-6.
3
Evaluating implementation of International Health Regulations core capacities: using the Electronic States Parties Self-Assessment Annual Reporting Tool (e-SPAR) to monitor progress with Joint External Evaluation indicators.评估《国际卫生条例》核心能力的实施情况:利用电子缔约国自我评估年度报告工具(e-SPAR)监测联合外部评估指标的进展情况。
Global Health. 2021 Jun 30;17(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12992-021-00720-5.
4
Operationalizing the ECOWAS regional one health coordination mechanism (2016-2019): Scoping review on progress, challenges and way forward.实施西非国家经济共同体区域一体化卫生协调机制(2016 - 2019年):关于进展、挑战及未来方向的范围界定审查
One Health. 2021 Jul 8;13:100291. doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2021.100291. eCollection 2021 Dec.
5
Improving global health security through implementation of the National Action Plan for Health Security in Sierra Leone, 2018-2021: lessons from the field.通过实施 2018-2021 年塞拉利昂卫生安全国家行动计划来改善全球卫生安全:实地经验教训。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Nov 7;23(1):2178. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17103-7.
6
COVID-19 pandemic in Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) region: implication for capacity strengthening at Point of Entry.西非国家经济共同体(西非经共体)区域的 COVID-19 大流行:对入境点能力建设的影响。
Pan Afr Med J. 2021 May 25;39:67. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2021.39.67.29089. eCollection 2021.
7
Lack of Alignment Between WHO Joint External Evaluation and State Party Self-Assessment Scores Undermines Utility as Evaluation Tools for the Department of Defense.世卫组织联合外部评估与缔约国自评分数之间缺乏一致性,降低了其作为国防部评估工具的效用。
Health Secur. 2022 Jul-Aug;20(4):321-330. doi: 10.1089/hs.2021.0209. Epub 2022 Jul 26.
8
The one health landscape in Sub-Saharan African countries.撒哈拉以南非洲国家的“同一健康”格局。
One Health. 2021 Sep 15;13:100325. doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2021.100325. eCollection 2021 Dec.
9
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
10
Establishing National Multisectoral Coordination and collaboration mechanisms to prevent, detect, and respond to public health threats in Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone 2016-2018.2016 - 2018年在几内亚、利比里亚和塞拉利昂建立国家多部门协调与合作机制,以预防、发现并应对公共卫生威胁。
One Health Outlook. 2019 Nov 27;1:4. doi: 10.1186/s42522-019-0004-z. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Towards global control of parasitic diseases in the Covid-19 era: One Health and the future of multisectoral global health governance.在新冠疫情时代实现寄生虫病的全球控制:One Health 及多部门全球卫生治理的未来。
Adv Parasitol. 2021;114:1-26. doi: 10.1016/bs.apar.2021.08.007. Epub 2021 Oct 11.
2
Operationalizing the ECOWAS regional one health coordination mechanism (2016-2019): Scoping review on progress, challenges and way forward.实施西非国家经济共同体区域一体化卫生协调机制(2016 - 2019年):关于进展、挑战及未来方向的范围界定审查
One Health. 2021 Jul 8;13:100291. doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2021.100291. eCollection 2021 Dec.
3
Reflecting on One Health in Action During the COVID-19 Response.
反思新冠疫情应对期间的“同一健康”行动
Front Vet Sci. 2020 Oct 30;7:578649. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.578649. eCollection 2020.
4
Regional approaches for enhancing global health security.加强全球卫生安全的区域方法。
BMC Public Health. 2019 May 10;19(Suppl 3):473. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6789-y.
5
Importance of a One Health approach in advancing global health security and the Sustainable Development Goals.“同一健康”方法在推进全球卫生安全和可持续发展目标方面的重要性。
Rev Sci Tech. 2019 May;38(1):145-154. doi: 10.20506/rst.38.1.2949.
6
One Health operations: a critical component in the International Health Regulations Monitoring and Evaluation Framework.一体化健康行动:《国际卫生条例》监测与评价框架中的关键组成部分。
Rev Sci Tech. 2019 May;38(1):303-314. doi: 10.20506/rst.38.1.2962.
7
Implementation framework for One Health approach.“同一健康”方法的实施框架。
Indian J Med Res. 2019 Mar;149(3):329-331. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1517_18.
8
Overcoming challenges for designing and implementing the One Health approach: A systematic review of the literature.克服设计和实施“同一健康”方法的挑战:文献系统综述
One Health. 2019 Mar 18;7:100085. doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2019.100085. eCollection 2019 Jun.
9
Analysis of results from the Joint External Evaluation: examining its strength and assessing for trends among participating countries.联合外部评估结果分析:考察其优势并评估参与国家的趋势。
J Glob Health. 2018 Dec;8(2):020416. doi: 10.7189/jogh.08.020416.
10
AIDS, Avian flu, SARS, MERS, Ebola, Zika… what next?艾滋病、禽流感、SARS、MERS、埃博拉、寨卡……接下来会是什么?
Vaccine. 2017 Aug 16;35(35 Pt A):4470-4474. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.04.082. Epub 2017 Jun 19.