Department of Respiratory Medicine, Nara Medical University, 840 Shijo-cho, Nara, 634-8522, Japan.
Division of Respirology, Neurology and Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan.
Respir Res. 2024 Aug 5;25(1):297. doi: 10.1186/s12931-024-02918-8.
BACKGROUND: Japanese guidelines recommend triple inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA)/long-acting β-agonist (LABA) therapy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and no concurrent asthma diagnosis who experience frequent exacerbations and have blood eosinophil (EOS) count ≥ 300 cells/mm, and in patients with COPD and asthma with continuing/worsening symptoms despite receiving dual ICS/LABA therapy. These post-hoc analyses of the KRONOS study in patients with COPD and without an asthma diagnosis, examine the effects of fixed-dose triple therapy with budesonide/glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate dihydrate (BGF) versus dual therapies on lung function and exacerbations based on blood EOS count - focusing on blood EOS count 100 to < 300 cells/mm - as a function of exacerbation history and COPD severity. METHODS: In KRONOS, patients were randomized to receive treatments that included BGF 320/14.4/10 µg, glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate dihydrate (GFF) 14.4/10 µg, or budesonide/formoterol fumarate dihydrate (BFF) 320/10 µg via metered dose inhaler (two inhalations twice-daily for 24 weeks). These post-hoc analyses assessed changes from baseline in morning pre-dose trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV) over 12-24 weeks and moderate or severe COPD exacerbations rates over 24 weeks. The KRONOS study was not prospectively powered for these subgroup analyses. RESULTS: Among patients with blood EOS count 100 to < 300 cells/mm, least squares mean treatment differences for lung function improvement favored BGF over BFF in patients without an exacerbation history in the past year and in patients with moderate and severe COPD, with observed differences ranging from 62 ml to 73 ml across populations. In this same blood EOS population, moderate or severe exacerbation rates were reduced for BGF relative to GFF by 56% in patients without an exacerbation history in the past year, by 47% in patients with moderate COPD, and by 50% in patients with severe COPD. CONCLUSIONS: These post-hoc analyses of patients with moderate-to-very severe COPD from the KRONOS study seem to indicate clinicians may want to consider a step-up to triple therapy in patients with persistent/worsening symptoms with blood EOS count > 100 cells/mm, even if disease severity is moderate and there is no recent history of exacerbations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov registry number NCT02497001 (registration date, 13 July 2015).
背景:日本指南建议在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者中使用三联吸入皮质激素(ICS)/长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂(LAMA)/长效β-激动剂(LABA)治疗,这些患者无哮喘诊断但频繁发作且血嗜酸性粒细胞(EOS)计数≥300 个细胞/mm3,或在 COPD 和哮喘患者中使用,这些患者尽管接受了双联 ICS/LABA 治疗但仍有持续/加重的症状。这些 KRONOS 研究中的事后分析针对无哮喘诊断的 COPD 患者,根据血 EOS 计数(重点关注血 EOS 计数 100 至<300 个细胞/mm3)检查固定剂量三联疗法(布地奈德/格隆溴铵/富马酸福莫特罗双水化合物(BGF))与双疗法对肺功能和加重的影响,这些分析是基于加重史和 COPD 严重程度进行的。
方法:在 KRONOS 研究中,患者随机接受治疗,包括布地奈德/格隆溴铵/富马酸福莫特罗双水化合物(BGF)320/14.4/10μg、格隆溴铵/富马酸福莫特罗双水化合物(GFF)14.4/10μg或布地奈德/富马酸福莫特罗双水化合物(BFF)320/10μg,通过计量吸入器(每日两次,每次 2 次,持续 24 周)。这些事后分析评估了从基线开始的 12-24 周期间清晨预剂量谷值用力呼气量(FEV)的变化和 24 周期间中度或重度 COPD 加重的发生率。KRONOS 研究没有针对这些亚组分析进行前瞻性功率计算。
结果:在血 EOS 计数 100 至<300 个细胞/mm3的患者中,在过去一年中没有加重史且患有中度和重度 COPD 的患者中,BGF 治疗对肺功能改善的最小二乘均值治疗差异优于 BFF,观察到的差异在不同人群中为 62ml 至 73ml。在同一血 EOS 人群中,与 GFF 相比,BGF 可使过去一年中无加重史的患者中度或重度加重的发生率降低 56%,使中度 COPD 患者降低 47%,使重度 COPD 患者降低 50%。
结论:这些来自 KRONOS 研究的中度至重度 COPD 患者的事后分析似乎表明,临床医生可能希望考虑在血 EOS 计数>100 个细胞/mm3、症状持续/加重的患者中采用升级治疗,即使疾病严重程度为中度且近期无加重史。
试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov 注册号 NCT02497001(注册日期,2015 年 7 月 13 日)。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2023-7-24
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2022
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2022