Suppr超能文献

COPD 单吸入器三联与双联支气管扩张剂治疗:真实世界的比较疗效和安全性。

Single-Inhaler Triple versus Dual Bronchodilator Therapy in COPD: Real-World Comparative Effectiveness and Safety.

机构信息

Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute-Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2022 Aug 30;17:1975-1986. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S378486. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Randomized trials report that single-inhaler triple therapy is more effective than dual bronchodilators at reducing exacerbations in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, this effect may have been influenced by the forced withdrawal of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) at randomization. We used an adaptive selection new-user design to compare single-inhaler triple therapy with dual bronchodilators in real-world clinical practice.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We identified a cohort of COPD patients, 40 years or older, treated during 2017-2020, from the United Kingdom's Clinical Practice Research Datalink, a real-world practice setting. ICS-naïve patients initiating single-inhaler triple therapy or dual bronchodilators were compared on the incidence of COPD exacerbation and pneumonia over one year, after adjustment by propensity score weighting.

RESULTS

The cohort included 4106 new users of single-inhaler triple therapy and 29,702 of dual bronchodilators. Single-inhaler triple therapy was the first maintenance treatment in 44% of the users and 43% had no COPD exacerbations in the prior year. The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of a first moderate or severe exacerbation with triple therapy relative to dual bronchodilators was 1.08 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.00-1.16). Among patients with two or more prior exacerbations the HR was 0.83 (95% CI: 0.74-0.92), while for those with prior asthma diagnosis it was 0.86 (95% CI: 0.70-1.06) and with blood eosinophil count >300 cells/µL it was 0.89 (95% CI: 0.76-1.05). The incidence of severe pneumonia was increased with triple therapy (HR 1.50; 95% CI: 1.29-1.75).

CONCLUSION

In a real-world setting of COPD treatment among ICS-naïve patients, thus unaffected by ICS withdrawal, single-inhaler triple therapy was not more effective than dual bronchodilators at reducing the incidence of exacerbation, except among patients with multiple exacerbations. Single-inhaler triple therapy should be initiated mainly in patients with multiple exacerbations while, for most others, dual bronchodilators are just as effective whilst avoiding the excess risk of severe pneumonias.

摘要

目的

随机试验报告称,在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者中,单吸入器三联疗法比双支气管扩张剂更能有效减少加重。然而,这种效果可能受到随机撤用吸入性皮质类固醇(ICS)的影响。我们使用适应性选择新用户设计,在真实临床实践中比较单吸入器三联疗法与双支气管扩张剂。

患者和方法

我们从英国临床实践研究数据链接中确定了一组 40 岁或以上的 COPD 患者,这些患者在 2017-2020 年期间接受治疗。ICS 初治患者接受单吸入器三联疗法或双支气管扩张剂治疗,在经过倾向评分加权调整后,比较一年期间 COPD 加重和肺炎的发生率。

结果

队列包括 4106 名新使用单吸入器三联疗法的患者和 29702 名使用双支气管扩张剂的患者。单吸入器三联疗法在 44%的患者中作为首次维持治疗,且 43%的患者在前一年中无 COPD 加重。与双支气管扩张剂相比,三联疗法首次中度或重度加重的调整风险比(HR)为 1.08(95%置信区间(CI):1.00-1.16)。在有两次或两次以上加重史的患者中,HR 为 0.83(95%CI:0.74-0.92),而对于有既往哮喘诊断的患者为 0.86(95%CI:0.70-1.06),且血液嗜酸性粒细胞计数>300 个/µL 的患者为 0.89(95%CI:0.76-1.05)。三联疗法增加了严重肺炎的发生率(HR 1.50;95%CI:1.29-1.75)。

结论

在 ICS 初治患者的 COPD 治疗真实环境中,因此不受 ICS 撤用的影响,与双支气管扩张剂相比,单吸入器三联疗法在减少加重的发生率方面并不更有效,除了在有多次加重的患者中。单吸入器三联疗法主要应在有多次加重的患者中开始使用,而对于大多数其他患者,双支气管扩张剂同样有效,同时避免严重肺炎的风险增加。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f59/9440703/07c76eb8fb61/COPD-17-1975-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验