• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于已发表临床试验的贝叶斯荟萃分析构建剂量毒性当量模型。

BUILDING A DOSE TOXO-EQUIVALENCE MODEL FROM A BAYESIAN META-ANALYSIS OF PUBLISHED CLINICAL TRIALS.

作者信息

Sigworth Elizabeth A, Rubinstein Samuel M, Warner Jeremy L, Chen Yong, Chen Qingxia

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University.

Division of Hematology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine.

出版信息

Ann Appl Stat. 2023 Dec;17(4):2993-3012. doi: 10.1214/23-aoas1748. Epub 2023 Oct 30.

DOI:10.1214/23-aoas1748
PMID:39104542
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11299894/
Abstract

In clinical practice medications are often interchanged in treatment protocols when a patient negatively reacts to their first line of therapy. Although switching between medications is common, clinicians often lack structured guidance when choosing the initial dose and frequency of a new medication, given the former with respect to risk of adverse events. In this paper we propose to establish this dose toxo-equivalence relationship using published clinical trial results with one or both drugs of interest via a Bayesian meta-analysis model that accounts for both within- and between-study variances. With the posterior parameter samples from this model, we compute median and 95% credible intervals for equivalent dose pairs of the two drugs that are predicted to produce equal rates of an adverse outcome, relying solely on study-level information. Via extensive simulations, we show that this approach approximates well the true dose toxo-equivalence relationship, considering different study designs, levels of between-study variance, and the inclusion/exclusion of nonconfounder/nonmodifier subject-level covariates in addition to study-level covariates. We compare the performance of this study-level meta-analysis estimate to the equivalent individual patient data meta-analysis model and find comparable bias and minimal efficiency loss in the study-level coefficients used in the dose toxo-equivalence relationship. Finally, we present the findings of our dose toxo-equivalence model applied to two chemotherapy drugs, based on data from 169 published clinical trials.

摘要

在临床实践中,当患者对一线治疗产生负面反应时,治疗方案中经常会更换药物。虽然药物之间的切换很常见,但临床医生在选择新药的初始剂量和给药频率时,往往缺乏结构化的指导,尤其是考虑到前者可能带来的不良事件风险。在本文中,我们建议通过贝叶斯荟萃分析模型,利用已发表的关于一种或两种感兴趣药物的临床试验结果,建立这种剂量毒性等效关系,该模型同时考虑了研究内和研究间的方差。利用该模型的后验参数样本,我们仅依靠研究层面的信息,计算两种药物等效剂量对的中位数和95%可信区间,这些等效剂量对预计会产生相同的不良结局发生率。通过广泛的模拟,我们表明,考虑到不同的研究设计、研究间方差水平,以及除研究层面协变量外是否纳入非混杂/非修饰个体层面协变量,这种方法能很好地近似真实的剂量毒性等效关系。我们将这种研究层面荟萃分析估计的性能与等效的个体患者数据荟萃分析模型进行比较,发现在剂量毒性等效关系中使用的研究层面系数存在可比的偏差和最小的效率损失。最后,我们根据169项已发表临床试验的数据,展示了我们的剂量毒性等效模型应用于两种化疗药物的结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0ab/11299894/afa079f490a7/nihms-1959373-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0ab/11299894/da44d96b95d6/nihms-1959373-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0ab/11299894/e6aec9879823/nihms-1959373-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0ab/11299894/5bdc55614b59/nihms-1959373-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0ab/11299894/3d8d8fb82d57/nihms-1959373-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0ab/11299894/afa079f490a7/nihms-1959373-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0ab/11299894/da44d96b95d6/nihms-1959373-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0ab/11299894/e6aec9879823/nihms-1959373-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0ab/11299894/5bdc55614b59/nihms-1959373-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0ab/11299894/3d8d8fb82d57/nihms-1959373-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0ab/11299894/afa079f490a7/nihms-1959373-f0005.jpg

相似文献

1
BUILDING A DOSE TOXO-EQUIVALENCE MODEL FROM A BAYESIAN META-ANALYSIS OF PUBLISHED CLINICAL TRIALS.基于已发表临床试验的贝叶斯荟萃分析构建剂量毒性当量模型。
Ann Appl Stat. 2023 Dec;17(4):2993-3012. doi: 10.1214/23-aoas1748. Epub 2023 Oct 30.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Development of a bayesian toxo-equivalence model between docetaxel and paclitaxel.多西他赛与紫杉醇之间贝叶斯等效性模型的建立。
iScience. 2022 Mar 11;25(4):104045. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104045. eCollection 2022 Apr 15.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
Inference of equivalence for the ratio of two normal means with unspecified variances.两个正态均值之比在方差未指定时的等效性推断。
J Biopharm Stat. 2014;24(6):1264-79. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2014.941990.
6
7
Public sector reforms and their impact on the level of corruption: A systematic review.公共部门改革及其对腐败程度的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 May 24;17(2):e1173. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1173. eCollection 2021 Jun.
8
Therapeutic Equivalence of Biosimilar and Reference Biologic Drugs in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.治疗类风湿关节炎的生物类似药与参照生物药的等效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 May 1;6(5):e2315872. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.15872.
9
A Bayesian meta-analytic approach for safety signal detection in randomized clinical trials.一种用于随机临床试验中安全信号检测的贝叶斯荟萃分析方法。
Clin Trials. 2017 Apr;14(2):192-200. doi: 10.1177/1740774516683920. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
10
Association between pacifier use and breast-feeding, sudden infant death syndrome, infection and dental malocclusion.安抚奶嘴使用与母乳喂养、婴儿猝死综合征、感染及牙列不齐之间的关联。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2005;3(6):1-33. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200503060-00001.

本文引用的文献

1
Development of a bayesian toxo-equivalence model between docetaxel and paclitaxel.多西他赛与紫杉醇之间贝叶斯等效性模型的建立。
iScience. 2022 Mar 11;25(4):104045. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104045. eCollection 2022 Apr 15.
2
DLMM as a lossless one-shot algorithm for collaborative multi-site distributed linear mixed models.作为一种无损的一次性算法,DLMM 适用于协作式多站点分布式线性混合模型。
Nat Commun. 2022 Mar 30;13(1):1678. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-29160-4.
3
On random-effects meta-analysis.在随机效应荟萃分析中。
Biometrika. 2015 Jun;102(2):281-294. doi: 10.1093/biomet/asv011. Epub 2015 Apr 23.
4
Get real in individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis: a review of the methodology.个体参与者数据(IPD)荟萃分析中的实际情况:方法学综述
Res Synth Methods. 2015 Dec;6(4):293-309. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1160. Epub 2015 Aug 19.
5
HemOnc.org: A Collaborative Online Knowledge Platform for Oncology Professionals.HemOnc.org:肿瘤学专业人员的协作在线知识平台。
J Oncol Pract. 2015 May;11(3):e336-50. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2014.001511. Epub 2015 Mar 3.
6
On the relative efficiency of using summary statistics versus individual-level data in meta-analysis.关于在荟萃分析中使用汇总统计量与个体水平数据的相对效率。
Biometrika. 2010 Jun;97(2):321-332. doi: 10.1093/biomet/asq006. Epub 2010 Apr 15.
7
Meta-analysis for rare events.罕见事件的荟萃分析。
Stat Med. 2010 Sep 10;29(20):2078-89. doi: 10.1002/sim.3964.
8
Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies: no efficiency gain in using individual participant data.全基因组关联研究的荟萃分析:使用个体参与者数据没有效率增益。
Genet Epidemiol. 2010 Jan;34(1):60-6. doi: 10.1002/gepi.20435.
9
Peripheral nerve damage associated with administration of taxanes in patients with cancer.癌症患者使用紫杉烷类药物治疗相关的周围神经损伤。
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2008 Jun;66(3):218-28. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2008.01.008. Epub 2008 Mar 7.
10
Simpson's paradox and calculation of number needed to treat from meta-analysis.辛普森悖论与荟萃分析中所需治疗人数的计算
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2002;2:1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-2-1. Epub 2002 Jan 25.