Dewan Neha, Sommerlad Andrew, Chapman Hannah, Banerjee Sube, Corazzini Kirsten, Edvardsson David, Liougas Madalena P, Livingston Gill, McGilton Katherine S, O'Rourke Hannah M, Bethell Jennifer
KITE Research Institute Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network Toronto Ontario Canada.
Department of Physical Therapy Education College of Health Sciences Western University of Health Sciences Oregon USA.
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2024 Aug 5;10(3):e12492. doi: 10.1002/trc2.12492. eCollection 2024 Jul-Sep.
Social connection is important for long-term care (LTC) residents' quality of life and care. However, there is a lack of consensus on how to measure it and this limits ability to find what improves and impairs social connection in LTC homes. We therefore aimed to systematically review and evaluate the measurement properties of existing measures of social connection for LTC residents, to identify which, if any, measures can be recommended. We searched eight electronic databases from inception to April 2022 for studies which reported on psychometric properties of a measure of any aspect(s) of social connection (including social networks, interaction, engagement, support, isolation, connectedness, and loneliness) for LTC residents. We used COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guidelines to evaluate the measurement properties reported for each identified measure and make recommendations. We identified 62 studies reporting on 38 measures; 21 measured quality of life, well-being or life satisfaction and included a social connection subscale or standalone items and 17 measures specifically targeted social connection. We found there was little high-quality evidence on psychometric properties such as sufficient content validity ( = 0), structural validity ( = 3), internal consistency ( = 3), reliability ( = 1), measurement error ( = 0), construct validity ( = 4), criterion validity ( = 0) and responsiveness ( = 0). No measures demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties on all these aspects, so none could be recommended for use. Thirty-four measures have the potential to be recommended but require further research to assess their quality and the remaining four are not recommended for use. Our review therefore found that no existing measures have sufficient evidence to be recommended for assessment of social connection in residents of LTC homes. Further validation and reliability studies of existing instruments or the development of new measures are needed to enable accurate measurement of social connection in LTC residents for future observational and interventional studies.
Social connection is fundamental to person-centered care in long-term care homes.There is insufficient evidence for the reliability and validity of existing measures.No current measures can be recommended for use based on existing evidence.A reliable and valid measure of social connection is needed for future research.
社交联系对长期护理(LTC)机构居民的生活质量和护理至关重要。然而,对于如何衡量社交联系缺乏共识,这限制了我们发现改善和损害LTC机构中社交联系因素的能力。因此,我们旨在系统回顾和评估现有LTC机构居民社交联系测量工具的测量属性,以确定是否有可推荐的测量工具。我们检索了8个电子数据库,从建库至2022年4月,查找报告LTC机构居民社交联系(包括社交网络、互动、参与、支持、孤立、联系和孤独感)任何方面测量工具心理测量属性的研究。我们使用基于共识的健康测量工具选择标准(COSMIN)指南来评估每个已识别测量工具报告的测量属性并提出建议。我们识别出62项报告38种测量工具的研究;21种测量生活质量、幸福感或生活满意度,包括社交联系子量表或独立项目,17种测量工具专门针对社交联系。我们发现,关于心理测量属性,如充分的内容效度(=0)、结构效度(=3)、内部一致性(=3)、信度(=1)、测量误差(=0)、构想效度(=4)标准效度(=0)和反应度(=0),几乎没有高质量证据。没有测量工具在所有这些方面都表现出令人满意的心理测量属性,因此无法推荐使用任何一种。34种测量工具有可能被推荐,但需要进一步研究以评估其质量,其余4种不建议使用。因此,我们的综述发现,没有现有测量工具具有足够证据可被推荐用于评估LTC机构居民的社交联系。需要对现有工具进行进一步的验证和信度研究,或者开发新的测量工具,以便在未来的观察性和干预性研究中准确测量LTC机构居民的社交联系。
社交联系是长期护理机构中以人为主的护理的基础。现有测量工具的信度和效度证据不足。根据现有证据,无法推荐目前的任何测量工具使用。未来研究需要一种可靠且有效的社交联系测量工具。