Suppr超能文献

中隔切除术是否能改善纵隔子宫女性的生殖结局?系统评价和荟萃分析。

Does septum resection improve reproductive outcomes for women with a septate uterus? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Reproductive Medicine Center, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China.

Reproductive Medicine Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

出版信息

Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Jul 22;15:1361358. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1361358. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether incising the septum facilitates reproductive outcomes for patients with a septate uterus compared to expectant management.

METHODS

Research was retrieved from three electronic databases: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, with no time or language restrictions. Two authors independently selected the articles and extracted data regarding study characteristics, quality, and results. A random-effects model was employed, and summary risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 468 patients from two randomized controlled trials and one cohort study were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. Pooled results showed that septum resection did not improve the live birth rate for patients with a septate uterus (RR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.56 - 1.25, P = 0.39). Additionally, no significant differences were found between the septum resection and expectant management groups in terms of clinical pregnancy (RR = 1.08, 95% CI 0.81 - 1.44, P = 0.60), abortion (RR = 1.99, 95% CI 0.80 - 4.98, P = 0.14), and preterm delivery rates (RR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.42 - 2.31, P = 0.98).

CONCLUSION

Our data provide clear evidence that septum resection does not improve the reproductive outcomes of patients with a septate uterus. These findings might be useful for revising current clinical guidelines.

摘要

目的

探讨与期待治疗相比,切开隔子宫是否有利于纵隔子宫患者的生殖结局。

方法

研究检索了三个电子数据库:PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 图书馆,没有时间或语言限制。两位作者独立选择文章并提取关于研究特征、质量和结果的数据。采用随机效应模型,计算汇总风险比(RR)及其 95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

系统评价和荟萃分析共纳入了两项随机对照试验和一项队列研究的 468 名患者。汇总结果显示,纵隔切除术并未提高纵隔子宫患者的活产率(RR=0.84,95%CI=0.56-1.25,P=0.39)。此外,纵隔切除术组与期待治疗组之间的临床妊娠率(RR=1.08,95%CI=0.81-1.44,P=0.60)、流产率(RR=1.99,95%CI=0.80-4.98,P=0.14)和早产率(RR=0.99,95%CI=0.42-2.31,P=0.98)均无显著差异。

结论

我们的数据提供了明确的证据,表明纵隔切除术并不能改善纵隔子宫患者的生殖结局。这些发现可能有助于修订当前的临床指南。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14c8/11298444/355385e86b0f/fendo-15-1361358-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验