Liu Chang, Liao Zhiqi, Cai Lei, Gong Xueqi, Li Yanan, He Yunan, Chen Yinwei
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Centre for Reproductive Medicine, West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Sichuan University, Ministry of Education, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Apr 16;25(1):453. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07511-5.
This study aimed to investigate the optimal time interval between hysteroscopy and embryo transfer.
Electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched up to Jul 2021. Two authors selected the articles independently and extracted data regarding study characteristics, quality, and results. A random-effect model was employed, and summary risk ratios (RR) at 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.
A total of 2123 patients from 5 studies were included. Pooled results showed that no significant differences for clinical pregnancy rates within 50-day and 90-day time interval comparison groups (RR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.61-1.11, P = 0.21; and RR = 0.91, 95% CI 0.74-1.12, P = 0.38, respectively), whereas clinical pregnancy rate was significantly increased in patients with a waiting interval of ≤ 120 days (RR = 0.75, 95% CI 0.61-0.93, P = 0.009). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that transferring embryos within 50 days for patients with normal uterine cavities was associated with a higher live birth rate (RR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.54-0.95, P = 0.02).
This meta-analysis identified that performing embryo transfer within 120 days for patients who underwent adhesiolysis and polypectomy within 50 days for patients who underwent diagnostic hysteroscopy was associated with superior outcomes, respectively. These findings may provide evidence to guide clinical decisions for reproductive clinicians. The conclusions might be limited by the small publication numbers. Further studies with a larger sample size were recommended.
本研究旨在探讨宫腔镜检查与胚胎移植之间的最佳时间间隔。
检索截至2021年7月的电子数据库,包括PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆。两位作者独立选择文章并提取有关研究特征、质量和结果的数据。采用随机效应模型,计算95%置信区间(CI)的汇总风险比(RR)。
共纳入5项研究中的2123例患者。汇总结果显示,50天和90天时间间隔比较组的临床妊娠率无显著差异(RR分别为0.83,95%CI 0.61 - 1.11,P = 0.21;以及RR为0.91,95%CI 0.74 - 1.12,P = 0.38),而等待间隔≤120天的患者临床妊娠率显著提高(RR = 0.75,95%CI 0.61 - 0.93,P = 0.009)。亚组分析表明,子宫腔正常的患者在50天内移植胚胎与较高的活产率相关(RR = 0.71,95%CI 0.54 - 0.95,P = 0.