• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童和青少年人群腰椎间盘突出症的椎间盘切除术:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Discectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation in Pediatric and Adolescent Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Than Christian A, Valiotis Angelique K, Prottoy Abid R, Alexander Kyle G, Alogakos Marios, Adra Maamoun, Smayra Karen, Curtis Tom J, Kim Grace E, Nakanishi Hayato, Dannawi Zaher

机构信息

Biomedical Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, AUS.

Pediatrics, University of Nicosia, Limassol, CYP.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Jul 5;16(7):e63880. doi: 10.7759/cureus.63880. eCollection 2024 Jul.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.63880
PMID:39104990
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11298768/
Abstract

Corroborative evidence for discectomy in pediatric or adolescent patients remains scarce, with this single-arm meta-analysis investigating discectomy for lumbar disc herniation (LDH) within this population. PubMed, Embase (Elsevier), CiNAHL, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched. Eligible studies reported pediatric patients under 21 years of age with a diagnosis of LDH that was treated surgically with discectomy. This review was registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023463358). Twenty-two studies met the eligibility criteria (n=1182). Visual analog scale (VAS) scores for back pain at baseline were 5.34 (95% CI: 4.48, 6.20, I=98.9%). Postoperative VAS back pain scores after 12 months were 0.88 (95% CI: 0.57, 1.19, I=95.6%). VAS scores for leg pain at baseline were 7.03 (95% CI: 6.63, 7.43, I=93.5%). Postoperative VAS leg pain scores after 12 months were 1.02 (95% CI: 0.68, 1.36, I=97.0%). Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores at baseline were 55.46 (95% CI: 43.69, 67.24, I=99.9%). Postoperative ODI scores after 12 months were 7.82 (95% CI: 4.95, 10.69, I=99.4%). VAS back, VAS leg and ODI scores demonstrated a minimum clinically important difference (MCID) at all postoperative points. Perioperative outcomes demonstrated operative time as 85.71 mins (95% CI: 73.96, 97.46, I=99.4%) and hospital length of stay as 3.81 days (95% CI: 3.20, 4.41, I=98.5%). The postoperative reoperation rate at the same level was 0.01 (95% CI: <0.00, 0.02, I=0%). Discectomy appears safe and effective in pediatric and adolescent patients suffering from LDH. The findings here provide groundwork for future randomized control trials against conservative measures to elaborate on optimal management and elucidate long-term outcomes.

摘要

关于小儿或青少年患者椎间盘切除术的确凿证据仍然很少,本单臂荟萃分析研究了该人群中腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)的椎间盘切除术。检索了PubMed、Embase(爱思唯尔)、护理及健康领域数据库(CiNAHL)、考克兰图书馆、Scopus和科学网。符合条件的研究报告了21岁以下诊断为LDH并接受椎间盘切除术手术治疗的儿科患者。本综述已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(PROSPERO,注册号:CRD42023463358)注册。22项研究符合纳入标准(n=1182)。基线时背痛的视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分为5.34(95%CI:4.48,6.20,I=98.9%)。12个月后的术后VAS背痛评分为0.88(95%CI:0.57,1.19,I=95.6%)。基线时腿痛的VAS评分为7.03(95%CI:6.63,7.43,I=93.5%)。12个月后的术后VAS腿痛评分为1.02(95%CI:0.68,1.36,I=97.0%)。奥斯维斯特残疾指数(ODI)基线评分为55.46(95%CI:43.69,67.24,I=99.9%)。1个月后的术后ODI评分为7.82(95%CI:4.95,10.69,I=99.4%)。VAS背痛、VAS腿痛和ODI评分在所有术后时间点均显示出最小临床重要差异(MCID)。围手术期结果显示手术时间为85.71分钟(95%CI:73.96,97.46,I=99.4%),住院时间为3.81天(95%CI:3.20,4.41,I=98.5%)。同一水平的术后再次手术率为0.01(95%CI:<0.00,0.02,I=0%)。椎间盘切除术在患有LDH的小儿和青少年患者中似乎是安全有效的。这里的研究结果为未来针对保守治疗措施的随机对照试验奠定了基础,以详细阐述最佳治疗方案并阐明长期预后。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb99/11298768/9ece7e66ec7a/cureus-0016-00000063880-i13.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb99/11298768/00283c04dacf/cureus-0016-00000063880-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb99/11298768/38bf05095a67/cureus-0016-00000063880-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb99/11298768/7d9359076384/cureus-0016-00000063880-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb99/11298768/dc4aca2b2673/cureus-0016-00000063880-i04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb99/11298768/d7c43f92127e/cureus-0016-00000063880-i05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb99/11298768/090a59b3683d/cureus-0016-00000063880-i06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb99/11298768/1b32a8069668/cureus-0016-00000063880-i07.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb99/11298768/741733464f42/cureus-0016-00000063880-i08.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb99/11298768/00eab7db645d/cureus-0016-00000063880-i09.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb99/11298768/b052de6333e5/cureus-0016-00000063880-i10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb99/11298768/6b11a4f48927/cureus-0016-00000063880-i11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb99/11298768/5775eeb25c0b/cureus-0016-00000063880-i12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb99/11298768/9ece7e66ec7a/cureus-0016-00000063880-i13.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb99/11298768/00283c04dacf/cureus-0016-00000063880-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb99/11298768/38bf05095a67/cureus-0016-00000063880-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb99/11298768/7d9359076384/cureus-0016-00000063880-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb99/11298768/dc4aca2b2673/cureus-0016-00000063880-i04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb99/11298768/d7c43f92127e/cureus-0016-00000063880-i05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb99/11298768/090a59b3683d/cureus-0016-00000063880-i06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb99/11298768/1b32a8069668/cureus-0016-00000063880-i07.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb99/11298768/741733464f42/cureus-0016-00000063880-i08.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb99/11298768/00eab7db645d/cureus-0016-00000063880-i09.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb99/11298768/b052de6333e5/cureus-0016-00000063880-i10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb99/11298768/6b11a4f48927/cureus-0016-00000063880-i11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb99/11298768/5775eeb25c0b/cureus-0016-00000063880-i12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb99/11298768/9ece7e66ec7a/cureus-0016-00000063880-i13.jpg

相似文献

1
Discectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation in Pediatric and Adolescent Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.儿童和青少年人群腰椎间盘突出症的椎间盘切除术:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cureus. 2024 Jul 5;16(7):e63880. doi: 10.7759/cureus.63880. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy, microendoscopic discectomy, and microdiscectomy for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation: minimum 2-year follow-up results.经皮内镜下经椎间孔椎间盘切除术、显微内镜下椎间盘切除术和显微椎间盘切除术治疗症状性腰椎间盘突出症的比较:至少2年的随访结果
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Mar;28(3):317-325. doi: 10.3171/2017.6.SPINE172. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
3
Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy via Transforaminal Approach Combined with Interlaminar Approach for L4/5 and L5/S1 Two-Level Disc Herniation.经皮椎间孔镜下腰椎间盘切除术联合经椎间孔入路与经椎板间入路治疗 L4/5 和 L5/S1 双节段椎间盘突出症
Orthop Surg. 2021 May;13(3):979-988. doi: 10.1111/os.12862. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
4
Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy versus microendoscopic discectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: a meta-analysis.经皮内镜腰椎间盘切除术与显微镜下椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Int Orthop. 2019 Apr;43(4):923-937. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4253-8. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
5
Is discectomy effective for treating low back pain in patients with lumbar disc herniation and Modic changes? A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.椎间盘切除术对伴有腰椎间盘突出症和Modic改变的患者治疗下腰痛是否有效?一项队列研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Spine J. 2023 Apr;23(4):533-549. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.10.008. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
6
Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy compared with microendoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: 1-year results of an ongoing randomized controlled trial.经皮椎间孔镜下椎间盘切除术与显微内镜下椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的比较:一项正在进行的随机对照试验的1年结果
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Mar;28(3):300-310. doi: 10.3171/2017.7.SPINE161434. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
7
Unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy versus microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.单侧双通道内镜下椎间盘切除术与显微椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的系统评价和Meta分析
Eur Spine J. 2024 Jun;33(6):2139-2153. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-08116-2. Epub 2024 Feb 22.
8
Comparative outcomes of epidural steroids versus placebo after lumbar discectomy in lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.腰椎间盘突出症患者行腰椎间盘切除术后硬膜外注射类固醇与安慰剂的比较结果:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2018 Dec;28(8):1589-1599. doi: 10.1007/s00590-018-2229-4. Epub 2018 May 29.
9
Short-Term Postoperative Pain and Function of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Discectomy versus Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Single-Segment Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.单节段腰椎间盘突出症行单侧双孔道内镜下椎间盘切除术与经皮内镜下腰椎间盘切除术的术后短期疼痛及功能:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Appl Bionics Biomech. 2022 Apr 14;2022:5360277. doi: 10.1155/2022/5360277. eCollection 2022.
10
Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Versus Posterior Open Lumbar Microdiscectomy for the Treatment of Symptomatic Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.经皮内窥镜腰椎间盘切除术与后路开放式腰椎显微椎间盘切除术治疗有症状的腰椎间盘突出症:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
World Neurosurg. 2018 Dec;120:352-362. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.08.236. Epub 2018 Sep 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Characterizing Spinal Decompression for Foot Drop Caused by Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohorts.腰椎退行性疾病所致足下垂的脊髓减压特征:队列研究的系统评价与荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 24;14(13):4470. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134470.
2
Adolescent lumbar disc herniation: etiology, diagnosis, and treatment options.青少年腰椎间盘突出症:病因、诊断及治疗选择
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Jun 20;20(1):605. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-06024-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Surgical outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy in obese adolescents with lumbar disc herniation.经皮内镜腰椎间盘切除术治疗肥胖青少年腰椎间盘突出症的手术效果。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Sep 6;24(1):710. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06842-8.
2
The effect of exercise post vertebral augmentation in osteoporotic patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.运动对骨质疏松症椎体增强术后患者的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Orthop Res. 2023 Dec;41(12):2703-2712. doi: 10.1002/jor.25631. Epub 2023 May 30.
3
Lumbar Disc Herniation: Diagnosis and Management.
腰椎间盘突出症:诊断与管理。
Am J Med. 2023 Jul;136(7):645-651. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2023.03.024. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
4
Does Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Adolescent Posterior Ring Apophysis Fracture Accompanied with Lumbar Disc Herniation Have Better Outcome Than Lumbar Disc Herniation Alone?经皮内镜下腰椎间盘切除术治疗青少年后环骨骺骨折伴腰椎间盘突出症的疗效是否优于单纯腰椎间盘突出症?
J Pain Res. 2023 Mar 16;16:911-919. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S380945. eCollection 2023.
5
VAS and NRS, Same or Different? Are Visual Analog Scale Values and Numerical Rating Scale Equally Viable Tools for Assessing Patients after Microdiscectomy?VAS 和 NRS,相同还是不同?视觉模拟评分法和数字评分法在评估微创椎间盘切除术患者时同样可行吗?
Pain Res Manag. 2022 Mar 29;2022:5337483. doi: 10.1155/2022/5337483. eCollection 2022.
6
Meeting Patient Expectations and Achieving a Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Back Disability, Back Pain, and Leg Pain May Provide Predictive Utility for Achieving Patient Satisfaction Among Lumbar Decompression Patients.满足患者的期望并实现背部残疾、背痛和腿痛的最小临床重要差异,可能为腰椎减压患者实现患者满意度提供预测效用。
World Neurosurg. 2022 Jun;162:e328-e335. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.03.002. Epub 2022 Mar 5.
7
One-Stage Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Symptomatic Double-Level Contiguous Adolescent Lumbar Disc Herniation.一期经皮内镜腰椎间盘切除术治疗症状性双节段连续青少年腰椎间盘突出症。
Orthop Surg. 2021 Jul;13(5):1532-1539. doi: 10.1111/os.13097. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
8
Comparison of Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy and Open Lumbar Discectomy in the Treatment of Adolescent Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Retrospective Analysis.经皮内镜腰椎间盘切除术与开放腰椎间盘切除术治疗青少年腰椎间盘突出症的比较:回顾性分析。
World Neurosurg. 2021 Jul;151:e911-e917. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.05.007. Epub 2021 May 11.
9
Full Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Versus Laminectomy for Cauda Equina Syndrome.全内镜下腰椎间盘切除术与椎板切除术治疗马尾综合征的对比
Int J Spine Surg. 2021 Feb;15(1):105-112. doi: 10.14444/8014. Epub 2021 Feb 12.
10
Adolescent Disc Disease: Risk Factors and Treatment Success-Related Factors.青少年椎间盘疾病:风险因素及与治疗成功相关的因素
World Neurosurg. 2021 Apr;148:e314-e320. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.12.126. Epub 2021 Jan 4.