Suppr超能文献

既往口服抗凝治疗对新型冠状病毒肺炎出院后结局的影响:一项全球联合健康网络分析的结果

Impact of prior oral anticoagulation therapies on post-discharge outcomes after COVID-19: Results from a global federated health network analysis.

作者信息

Rivera-Caravaca José Miguel, Frost Freddy, Marín Francisco, Lip Gregory Y H

机构信息

Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science at University of Liverpool, Liverpool John Moores University and Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK.

Faculty of Nursing, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Invest. 2024 Dec;54(12):e14299. doi: 10.1111/eci.14299. Epub 2024 Aug 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The impact of chronic oral anticoagulant (OACs) use on long-term post-discharge outcomes after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) hospitalisation remains unclear. Herein, we compared clinical outcomes up to 2-years after COVID-19 hospitalisation between patients on vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), direct-acting OACs (DOACs) and no OAC therapy.

METHODS

Data from TriNetX, a global federated health research network, were used. Adult patients on VKAs, DOACs or no OAC therapy at diagnosis of COVID-19 between 20 January 2020 and 31 December 2021, who were hospitalised for COVID-19, were included. The primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, ischaemic stroke/transient ischaemic attack (TIA)/systemic embolism (SE) and the composite of intracranial haemorrhage (ICH)/gastrointestinal bleeding, at 2 years after COVID-19 hospitalisation.

RESULTS

We included 110,834 patients with COVID-19. Following propensity score matching (PSM), we identified a decreased mortality risk in DOAC-treated patients compared to the no OAC cohort (RR .808, 95% CI .751-.870). A higher risk of ischaemic stroke/TIA/SE was observed in VKA users compared to DOAC users (RR 1.100, 95% CI 1.020-1.220) and in VKA users compared to patients not taking OAC (RR 1.400, 95% CI 1.140-1.720). VKA use was associated with a greater risk of ICH/gastrointestinal bleeding than DOAC users (RR 1.198, 95% CI 1.066-1.347), while DOAC users had a lower risk compared to no OAC-treated patients (RR .840, 95% CI .754-.936).

CONCLUSION

COVID-19 patients taking prior DOACs were associated with lower long-term mortality risk and ICH/gastrointestinal bleeding than patients not taking OAC. Compared to patients on DOACs, VKA users were associated with higher risks of mortality, ischaemic stroke/TIA/SE and ICH/gastrointestinal bleeding.

摘要

背景

长期口服抗凝剂(OACs)的使用对2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)住院后的长期出院后结局的影响尚不清楚。在此,我们比较了维生素K拮抗剂(VKAs)、直接作用口服抗凝剂(DOACs)使用者与未接受OAC治疗的患者在COVID-19住院后长达2年的临床结局。

方法

使用来自全球联合健康研究网络TriNetX的数据。纳入2020年1月20日至2021年12月31日期间诊断为COVID-19时接受VKAs、DOACs治疗或未接受OAC治疗且因COVID-19住院的成年患者。主要结局是COVID-19住院2年后的全因死亡率、缺血性中风/短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)/全身性栓塞(SE)以及颅内出血(ICH)/胃肠道出血的复合结局。

结果

我们纳入了110,834例COVID-19患者。经过倾向评分匹配(PSM)后,我们发现与未接受OAC治疗的队列相比,接受DOAC治疗的患者死亡风险降低(风险比[RR]0.808,95%置信区间[CI]0.751 - 0.870)。与DOAC使用者相比,VKA使用者发生缺血性中风/TIA/SE的风险更高(RR 1.100,95% CI 1.020 - 1.220),与未服用OAC的患者相比,VKA使用者发生缺血性中风/TIA/SE的风险也更高(RR 1.400,95% CI 1.140 - 1.720)。与DOAC使用者相比,使用VKA发生ICH/胃肠道出血的风险更高(RR 1.198,95% CI 1.066 - 1.347),而与未接受OAC治疗的患者相比,DOAC使用者的风险更低(RR 0.840,95% CI 0.754 - 0.936)。

结论

与未接受OAC治疗的患者相比,服用过DOAC的COVID-19患者长期死亡风险和ICH/胃肠道出血风险更低。与DOAC使用者相比,VKA使用者的死亡、缺血性中风/TIA/SE和ICH/胃肠道出血风险更高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验