Suppr超能文献

电休克治疗后发作后激越的预后因素及发生率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析

Prognostic Factors and Incidence for Postictal Agitation After Electroconvulsive Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

作者信息

Ertman Melissa, van der Valk Bouman Emy S, Clephas Pascal R D, Birkenhager Tom K, Klimek Markus

机构信息

From the Departments of Neuroscience.

Anesthesiology.

出版信息

J ECT. 2025 Mar 1;41(1):17-26. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0000000000001032. Epub 2024 Aug 22.

Abstract

Postictal agitation (PIA) is an adverse effect of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) and is known to predict other side effects of ECT, but inconsistencies in the literature remain regarding PIA prognostic factors and incidence. Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted (1) to identify prognostic factors for PIA following ECT and (2) to elucidate the diverse incidences of PIA following ECT based on demographic and clinical characteristics. Specifically, electronic databases were searched for retrospective observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that objectively reported PIA incidence. Additional inclusion criteria encompassed studies involving patients 18 years or older and allowed for the extraction of PIA prognostic factors. This resulted in the inclusion of 21 articles with 66,047 patients in total. A total of 35 prognostic factors were identified for PIA after ECT, consisting of 8 anesthesia-related, 19 patient-related, and 8 ECT-related prognostic factors. A meta-analysis was conducted for 7 prognostic factors. None of the prognostic factors demonstrated a significant effect on reducing or increasing PIA incidence. Mean PIA was 13.9% (18.0% adjusted) at the patient level and 12.4% (16.5% adjusted) at the session level. Overall risk of bias was generally moderate to low, except in the outcome measurement domain, where 43% of the studies had a high risk of bias. Although none of the prognostic factors in meta-analysis were significant, several other prognostic factors consistently indicated increased or decreased risk, providing direction for future research. A scarcity of (high-quality) data emphasizes the need for additional research on this topic to be conducted.

摘要

癫痫发作后激越(PIA)是电休克治疗(ECT)的一种不良反应,已知可预测ECT的其他副作用,但关于PIA的预后因素和发生率,文献中仍存在不一致之处。因此,进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,(1)以确定ECT后PIA的预后因素,(2)根据人口统计学和临床特征阐明ECT后PIA的不同发生率。具体而言,检索电子数据库以查找客观报告PIA发生率的回顾性观察性研究和随机对照试验(RCT)。其他纳入标准包括涉及18岁及以上患者的研究,并允许提取PIA预后因素。这导致纳入了21篇文章,共66047名患者。共确定了35个ECT后PIA的预后因素,包括8个与麻醉相关、19个与患者相关和8个与ECT相关的预后因素。对7个预后因素进行了荟萃分析。没有一个预后因素对降低或增加PIA发生率有显著影响。在患者层面,PIA的平均发生率为13.9%(调整后为18.0%),在治疗层面为12.4%(调整后为16.5%)。除结果测量领域外,总体偏倚风险一般为中度至低度,其中43%的研究存在高偏倚风险。尽管荟萃分析中的预后因素均无显著意义,但其他几个预后因素始终表明风险增加或降低,为未来研究提供了方向。(高质量)数据的缺乏强调了对此主题进行更多研究的必要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/982c/11895820/eb30cb7732f1/ject-41-17-g001.jpg

相似文献

4
Acute and Prophylactic Management of Postictal Agitation in Electroconvulsive Therapy.
J ECT. 2023 Sep 1;39(3):136-140. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0000000000000886. Epub 2022 Oct 1.
5
Postanesthesia Recovery Unit Optimization for Patients With Postictal Agitation Secondary to Electroconvulsive Therapy.
J ECT. 2023 Jun 1;39(2):91-96. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0000000000000891. Epub 2022 Oct 1.
7
Pharmacological prevention of postictal agitation after electroconvulsive therapy-A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Apr 20;14:1170931. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1170931. eCollection 2023.
8
Use of Orally Disintegrating Olanzapine During Electroconvulsive Therapy for Prevention of Postictal Agitation.
J Psychiatr Pract. 2016 Nov;22(6):459-462. doi: 10.1097/PRA.0000000000000185.
9
Dexmedetomidine for the management of postictal agitation after electroconvulsive therapy with S-ketamine anesthesia.
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2017 May 23;13:1389-1394. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S134751. eCollection 2017.
10

本文引用的文献

1
Pharmacological prevention of postictal agitation after electroconvulsive therapy-A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Apr 20;14:1170931. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1170931. eCollection 2023.
4
Severe Postictal Confusion After Electroconvulsive Therapy: A Retrospective Study.
J ECT. 2023 Mar 1;39(1):34-41. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0000000000000866. Epub 2022 May 25.
5
Dexmedetomidine vs Propofol as an Adjunct to Ketamine for Electroconvulsive Therapy Anaesthesia.
Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2022 Apr;50(2):114-120. doi: 10.5152/TJAR.2021.21217.
6
A comparative study of propofol, thiopentone sodium, and ketofol as induction agents for electro convulsive therapy.
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Oct-Dec;37(4):554-560. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_423_19. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
7
Factors Associated With Postictal Agitation After Electroconvulsive Therapy.
J ECT. 2022 Mar 1;38(1):60-61. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0000000000000807.
9
Factors associated with post-electroconvulsive therapy delirium: A retrospective chart review study.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Apr 9;100(14):e24508. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000024508.
10
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Jun;134:178-189. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.03.001. Epub 2021 Mar 29.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验