Schynoll Gerald, Irish Elizabeth, Wayne Joseph, Smith Raymond
J Grad Med Educ. 2018 Feb;10(1):78-83. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-17-00465.1.
Team-based learning (TBL) is an active learning strategy with descriptions of its use in resident education limited to pilot studies.
We developed a comprehensive medical knowledge TBL curriculum for an internal medicine residency, and assessed feasibility.
We developed a 135-topic TBL curriculum to replace a noon conference lecture series, and implemented it over a 3-year period (2013-2016). In this article we describe the planning, curricular design, faculty recruitment and development, and lesson structure. We assessed feasibility in terms of faculty participation, resident preparedness, resident and faculty satisfaction, and costs.
Most faculty initially were unfamiliar with TBL. Through faculty resource materials and flexible faculty development, participating faculty increased from 3 to 74. In a 2015 faculty survey (N = 64, 69% response rate), 73% (32 of 44) reported faculty development was adequate, 70% (31 of 44) indicated lesson preparation time reasonable, and 95% (42 of 44) reported preparation materials were helpful. A 2016 resident survey (N = 89, 72% response rate) revealed that most residents completed reading assignments in advance, 78% (50 of 64) found readings manageable, and 77% (49 of 64) felt they learned better from TBL compared to lectures. Costs included compensated time for 1 faculty TBL "champion" and an assistant.
Implementing a comprehensive medical knowledge curriculum using TBL in an internal medicine residency was feasible, and resulted in high faculty acceptance and learner satisfaction. Departmental support of a TBL champion, flexible faculty development, and well-designed resource materials were determinants of success.
基于团队的学习(TBL)是一种主动学习策略,其在住院医师教育中的应用描述仅限于试点研究。
我们为内科住院医师培训开发了一个全面的医学知识TBL课程,并评估其可行性。
我们开发了一个包含135个主题的TBL课程以取代午间会议讲座系列,并在3年期间(2013 - 2016年)实施。在本文中,我们描述了课程规划、课程设计、教师招募与发展以及课程结构。我们从教师参与度、住院医师准备情况、住院医师和教师满意度以及成本方面评估了可行性。
大多数教师最初不熟悉TBL。通过教师资源材料和灵活的教师发展,参与教师从3名增加到74名。在2015年的教师调查(N = 64,回复率69%)中,73%(44名中的32名)报告教师发展充足,70%(44名中的31名)表示备课时间合理,9