Health Sciences Center, State University of Northern Parana (UENP), Jacarezinho, Parana, Brazil.
Laboratory of Growth and Development (LabCreD), Center for Investigation in Pediatrics (CIPED), School of Medical Sciences (FCM), State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Eur J Sport Sci. 2024 Sep;24(9):1319-1327. doi: 10.1002/ejsc.12167. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
This study aimed to verify the relationship between changes in thigh muscle-localized bioelectrical impedance analysis (ML-BIA) parameters and performance in a multiple-set exercise. The sample consisted of 30 female university students (22.1 ± 3.2 years). The ML-BIA parameters, including localized muscle resistance (ML-R), reactance (ML-Xc), and phase angle (ML-AngF), were evaluated using a tetrapolar bioelectric impedance device operating at a frequency of 50 KHz. The multiple sets protocol was performed with an isokinetic dynamometer. For body composition, total and leg lean soft tissue (LST) were evaluated using dual X-ray absortiometry. Student's t-test for paired samples was used to compare the ML-BIA parameters and thigh circumference pre and postexercise. Linear regression analysis was performed to verify the ∆ML-PhA as a predictor of peak torque for the three sets alone while controlling for total and leg LST. There were differences in the ML-R (∆ = 0.02 ± 1.45 Ω; p = 0.001; and E.S = 0.19), ML-Xc (∆ = 2.90 ± 4.12 Ω; p = 0.043; and E.S = 0.36), and thigh circumference (∆ = 0.82 ± 0.60 cm; p < 0.001; and E.S = 0.16) pre- and post-multiple sets. ΔML-PhA was a predictor of performance in the first set (p = 0.002), regardless of total and leg LST. However, the ΔML-PhA lost its explanatory power in the other sets (second and third), and the variables that best explained performance were total and leg LST. The ML-BIA (ML-R and ML-Xc) parameters were sensitive and changed after the multiple sets protocol, and the ΔML-PhA was a predictor of performance in the first set regardless of the total and leg LST.
本研究旨在验证大腿肌肉局部生物电阻抗分析(ML-BIA)参数变化与多组运动表现之间的关系。样本由 30 名女大学生组成(22.1±3.2 岁)。使用四极生物电阻抗设备在 50 KHz 频率下评估 ML-BIA 参数,包括局部肌肉电阻(ML-R)、电抗(ML-Xc)和相位角(ML-AngF)。多组协议使用等速测力计进行。使用双能 X 射线吸收法评估身体成分,包括总身体和腿部瘦软组织(LST)。采用配对样本学生 t 检验比较运动前后 ML-BIA 参数和大腿周径。进行线性回归分析,以验证三组运动时∆ML-PhA 作为峰值扭矩的预测因子,同时控制总身体和腿部 LST。多组运动前后 ML-R(∆=0.02±1.45 Ω;p=0.001;和 E.S=0.19)、ML-Xc(∆=2.90±4.12 Ω;p=0.043;和 E.S=0.36)和大腿周径(∆=0.82±0.60 cm;p<0.001;和 E.S=0.16)存在差异。ΔML-PhA 是第一组运动表现的预测因子(p=0.002),与总身体和腿部 LST 无关。然而,在其他两组(第二和第三组)中,ΔML-PhA 失去了其解释力,而总身体和腿部 LST 是最佳的表现预测因子。ML-BIA(ML-R 和 ML-Xc)参数敏感且在多组方案后发生变化,ΔML-PhA 是第一组运动表现的预测因子,与总身体和腿部 LST 无关。