Suppr超能文献

基于索赔的衰弱指数在医疗保险受益人群中识别中度至重度痴呆的验证。

Validation of Claims-Based Frailty Index for Identifying Moderate-to-Severe Dementia in Medicare Beneficiaries.

机构信息

Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Boston, MA, USA; Division of Gerontology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Boston, MA, USA; Division of Gerontology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2024 Oct;25(10):105176. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105176. Epub 2024 Aug 3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Previous research using the National Health and Aging Trends Study showed that a claims-based frailty index (CFI) could be useful for identifying moderate-to-severe dementia in Medicare claims data. This study aims to validate the findings in an independent cohort.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

The study included 658 fee-for-service beneficiaries with dementia who participated in the 2016-2020 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey in the community-dwelling.

METHODS

We operationalized the Functional Assessment Staging Test (FAST) scale (range: 1-7, stages 5-7 indicate moderate-to-severe dementia) using survey information. CFI (range: 0-1, higher scores indicate greater frailty) was calculated using Medicare claims 12 months before the participants' interview date. Using the previously proposed cut point of 0.280, we calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for identifying moderate-to-severe dementia. Survey procedures were used to account for survey design and weighted to reflect national estimates.

RESULTS

The population had a mean age (SD) of 80.7 (8.9) years, 58.5% female, and 101 beneficiaries (14.8%) had moderate-to-severe dementia. The CFI cut point of 0.280 demonstrated sensitivity 0.49 (95% CI, 0.38-0.59), specificity 0.80 (0.77-0.84), PPV 0.30 (0.23-0.38), and NPV 0.90 (0.87-0.93). Compared with those with a CFI <0.280, beneficiaries with a CFI ≥0.280 had an elevated risk of mortality (2.9% vs 4.1%) over 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

These results confirm our previous findings that CFI among beneficiaries with a dementia diagnosis is a useful measure of moderate-to-severe dementia for Medicare claims data.

摘要

目的

先前使用国家健康老龄化趋势研究的研究表明,基于索赔的虚弱指数(CFI)可用于在医疗保险索赔数据中识别中度至重度痴呆症。本研究旨在验证独立队列中的发现。

设计

回顾性队列研究。

地点和参与者

该研究包括参加 2016-2020 年医疗保险当前受益人大调查的社区居住的 658 名中度至重度痴呆症的收费服务受益人。

方法

我们使用调查信息对功能评估分期测试(FAST)量表(范围:1-7,阶段 5-7 表示中度至重度痴呆症)进行了操作化。使用医疗保险索赔在参与者接受采访日期前 12 个月计算 CFI(范围:0-1,分数越高表示虚弱程度越高)。使用先前提出的 0.280 截断值,我们计算了识别中度至重度痴呆症的灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)。调查程序用于考虑调查设计,并进行加权以反映全国估计值。

结果

人群的平均年龄(标准差)为 80.7(8.9)岁,女性占 58.5%,101 名受益人(14.8%)患有中度至重度痴呆症。CFI 截断值为 0.280 时,灵敏度为 0.49(95%置信区间,0.38-0.59),特异性为 0.80(0.77-0.84),PPV 为 0.30(0.23-0.38),NPV 为 0.90(0.87-0.93)。与 CFI <0.280 的受益人相比,CFI≥0.280 的受益人在 1 年内的死亡率风险升高(2.9%对 4.1%)。

结论和意义

这些结果证实了我们先前的发现,即医疗保险索赔数据中诊断为痴呆症的受益人的 CFI 是中度至重度痴呆症的有用衡量标准。

相似文献

1
Validation of Claims-Based Frailty Index for Identifying Moderate-to-Severe Dementia in Medicare Beneficiaries.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2024 Oct;25(10):105176. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105176. Epub 2024 Aug 3.
2
Claims-Based Frailty Index as a Measure of Dementia Severity in Medicare Claims Data.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2023 Oct 28;78(11):2145-2151. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glad166.
4
Claims-Based Frailty Index and Its Relationship With Commonly Used Clinical Frailty Measures.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2024 Jul 1;79(7). doi: 10.1093/gerona/glae094.
5
Measuring Frailty in Medicare Data: Development and Validation of a Claims-Based Frailty Index.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2018 Jun 14;73(7):980-987. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glx229.
6
Change in a Claims-Based Frailty Index, Mortality, and Health Care Costs in Medicare Beneficiaries.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2023 Jul 8;78(7):1198-1203. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glad010.
7
Relationship of a Claims-Based Frailty Index to Annualized Medicare Costs: A Cohort Study.
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Apr 21;172(8):533-540. doi: 10.7326/M19-3261. Epub 2020 Apr 7.
8
9
Frailty and Time at Home After Post-Acute Care in Skilled Nursing Facilities.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2023 Jul;24(7):997-1001.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2023.02.106. Epub 2023 Mar 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Health Outcomes of Discontinuing Antipsychotics After Hospitalization in Older Adults.
JAMA Psychiatry. 2025 May 14. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2025.0702.

本文引用的文献

2
Claims-Based Frailty Index as a Measure of Dementia Severity in Medicare Claims Data.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2023 Oct 28;78(11):2145-2151. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glad166.
3
Association of Dementia Severity and Caregiver Support With Early Discharge From Home Health.
Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2022 Jan-Dec;37:15333175221129384. doi: 10.1177/15333175221129384.
4
Validation of Claims Algorithms to Identify Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2022 Jun 1;77(6):1261-1271. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glab373.
6
Family Caregiver Perspectives on Suffering of Persons With Severe Dementia: A Qualitative Study.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2021 Jul;62(1):20-27.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.11.021. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
7
Updating International Classification of Diseases 9th Revision to 10th Revision of a Claims-Based Frailty Index.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2021 Jun 14;76(7):1316-1317. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glaa150.
8
Dementia Severity Associated With Increased Risk of Potentially Preventable Readmissions During Home Health Care.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Apr;21(4):519-524.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.09.012. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
10
Measuring Frailty in Medicare Data: Development and Validation of a Claims-Based Frailty Index.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2018 Jun 14;73(7):980-987. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glx229.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验