Neuroscience Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213
Department of Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260.
J Neurosci. 2024 Sep 18;44(38):e0441242024. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0441-24.2024.
The frontal eye field (FEF) plays a well-established role in the control of visual attention. The strength of an FEF neuron's response to a visual stimulus presented in its receptive field is enhanced if the stimulus captures spatial attention by virtue of its salience. A stimulus can be rendered salient by cognitive factors as well as by physical attributes. These include surprise. The aim of the present experiment was to determine whether surprise-induced salience would result in enhanced visual-response strength in the FEF. Toward this end, we monitored neuronal activity in two male monkeys while presenting first a visual cue predicting with high probability that the reward delivered at the end of the trial would be good or bad (large or small) and then a visual cue announcing the size of the impending reward with certainty. The second cue usually confirmed but occasionally violated the expectation set up by the first cue. Neurons responded more strongly to the second cue when it violated than when it confirmed expectation. The increase in the firing rate was accompanied by a decrease in spike-count correlation as expected from capture of attention. Although both good surprise and bad surprise induced enhanced firing, the effects appeared to arise from distinct mechanisms as indicated by the fact that the bad-surprise signal appeared at a longer latency than the good-surprise signal and by the fact that the strength of the two signals varied independently across neurons.
额眼区(FEF)在视觉注意力控制中起着既定的作用。如果刺激因其显著性而通过其显著性来捕获空间注意力,那么刺激对 FEF 神经元的反应强度会增强。认知因素以及物理属性都可以使刺激变得显著。其中包括惊喜。本实验的目的是确定惊喜引起的显著性是否会导致 FEF 中的视觉反应强度增强。为此,我们在两只雄性猴子中监测神经元活动,首先呈现一个视觉提示,该提示以很高的概率预测在试验结束时提供的奖励是好是坏(大或小),然后呈现一个视觉提示,以确定即将到来的奖励的大小。第二个提示通常会确认,但偶尔会违反第一个提示所建立的期望。当第二个提示违反期望时,神经元的反应比确认期望时更强烈。与预期一致,随着注意的捕获,发射率的增加伴随着尖峰计数相关性的降低。虽然好惊喜和坏惊喜都能增强放电,但事实表明,这两种效应似乎来自不同的机制,因为坏惊喜信号的潜伏期比好惊喜信号长,并且两个信号的强度在神经元之间独立变化。