• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Neurons of Macaque Frontal Eye Field Signal Reward-Related Surprise.猴额眼区神经元信号传递与奖赏相关的意外信息。
J Neurosci. 2024 Sep 18;44(38):e0441242024. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0441-24.2024.
2
Frontal eye field activity enhances object identification during covert visual search.额眼区活动增强了隐蔽视觉搜索过程中的物体识别。
J Neurophysiol. 2009 Dec;102(6):3656-72. doi: 10.1152/jn.00750.2009. Epub 2009 Oct 14.
3
Perceptual and motor processing stages identified in the activity of macaque frontal eye field neurons during visual search.猕猴额叶眼区神经元在视觉搜索活动中所识别出的感知和运动处理阶段。
J Neurophysiol. 1996 Dec;76(6):4040-55. doi: 10.1152/jn.1996.76.6.4040.
4
Impact of expected reward on neuronal activity in prefrontal cortex, frontal and supplementary eye fields and premotor cortex.预期奖励对前额叶皮质、额叶和辅助眼区以及运动前皮质中神经元活动的影响。
J Neurophysiol. 2003 Sep;90(3):1766-89. doi: 10.1152/jn.00019.2003. Epub 2003 Jun 11.
5
Dissociation of response variability from firing rate effects in frontal eye field neurons during visual stimulation, working memory, and attention.在视觉刺激、工作记忆和注意力过程中,前额叶眼区神经元的反应变异性与放电率效应的分离。
J Neurosci. 2012 Feb 8;32(6):2204-16. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2967-11.2012.
6
Neuronal activity dependent on anticipated and elapsed delay in macaque prefrontal cortex, frontal and supplementary eye fields, and premotor cortex.猕猴前额叶皮层、额叶和辅助眼区以及运动前皮层中与预期和经过延迟相关的神经元活动。
J Neurophysiol. 2005 Aug;94(2):1469-97. doi: 10.1152/jn.00064.2005. Epub 2005 Apr 7.
7
Comparison of reward modulation in the frontal eye field and caudate of the macaque.猕猴额叶眼区和尾状核奖赏调节的比较。
J Neurosci. 2006 Jun 21;26(25):6695-703. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0836-06.2006.
8
Role of expected reward in frontal eye field during natural scene search.自然场景搜索过程中预期奖励在额叶眼区的作用。
J Neurophysiol. 2016 Aug 1;116(2):645-57. doi: 10.1152/jn.00119.2016. Epub 2016 May 11.
9
Neural basis of the set-size effect in frontal eye field: timing of attention during visual search.额叶眼区集合大小效应的神经基础:视觉搜索过程中的注意时机
J Neurophysiol. 2009 Apr;101(4):1699-704. doi: 10.1152/jn.00035.2009. Epub 2009 Jan 28.
10
Frontal eye field activity before visual search errors reveals the integration of bottom-up and top-down salience.视觉搜索错误之前的额眼区活动揭示了自下而上和自上而下显著性的整合。
J Neurophysiol. 2005 Jan;93(1):337-51. doi: 10.1152/jn.00330.2004. Epub 2004 Aug 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Fast adaptation to rule switching using neuronal surprise.利用神经元惊讶实现快速规则切换适应。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2024 Feb 20;20(2):e1011839. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011839. eCollection 2024 Feb.
2
Microsaccades are directed toward the midpoint between targets in a variably cued attention task.微扫视的方向是在一个可变提示注意任务中指向目标的中点。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 May 16;120(20):e2220552120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2220552120. Epub 2023 May 8.
3
Distractibility and impulsivity neural states are distinct from selective attention and modulate the implementation of spatial attention.注意力分散和冲动的神经状态与选择性注意不同,并且调节空间注意力的实施。
Nat Commun. 2022 Aug 15;13(1):4796. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-32385-y.
4
Inferior temporal cortex leads prefrontal cortex in response to a violation of a learned sequence.下颞叶皮层在前额叶皮层之前对违反习得序列做出反应。
Cereb Cortex. 2023 Mar 10;33(6):3124-3141. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhac265.
5
Surprise and recency in novelty detection in the primate brain.灵长类动物大脑中新奇检测中的惊喜和新颖性。
Curr Biol. 2022 May 23;32(10):2160-2173.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2022.03.064. Epub 2022 Apr 18.
6
Microsaccades as a marker not a cause for attention-related modulation.微扫视是注意调制的标记而非原因。
Elife. 2022 Mar 8;11:e74168. doi: 10.7554/eLife.74168.
7
Evaluating the evidence for expectation suppression in the visual system.评估视觉系统中期望抑制的证据。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021 Jul;126:368-381. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.04.002. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
8
Pupil Dilation and the Slow Wave ERP Reflect Surprise about Choice Outcome Resulting from Intrinsic Variability in Decision Confidence.瞳孔扩张和慢波 ERP 反映了由于决策信心的内在可变性而导致的对选择结果的惊讶。
Cereb Cortex. 2021 Jun 10;31(7):3565-3578. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhab032.
9
Single trial neuronal activity dynamics of attentional intensity in monkey visual area V4.猴子视觉皮层V4区注意力强度的单神经元活动动态
Nat Commun. 2021 Mar 31;12(1):2003. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22281-2.
10
Rare rewards amplify dopamine responses.稀有奖励会放大多巴胺反应。
Nat Neurosci. 2021 Apr;24(4):465-469. doi: 10.1038/s41593-021-00807-7. Epub 2021 Mar 8.

猴额眼区神经元信号传递与奖赏相关的意外信息。

Neurons of Macaque Frontal Eye Field Signal Reward-Related Surprise.

机构信息

Neuroscience Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213

Department of Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260.

出版信息

J Neurosci. 2024 Sep 18;44(38):e0441242024. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0441-24.2024.

DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0441-24.2024
PMID:39107059
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11411596/
Abstract

The frontal eye field (FEF) plays a well-established role in the control of visual attention. The strength of an FEF neuron's response to a visual stimulus presented in its receptive field is enhanced if the stimulus captures spatial attention by virtue of its salience. A stimulus can be rendered salient by cognitive factors as well as by physical attributes. These include surprise. The aim of the present experiment was to determine whether surprise-induced salience would result in enhanced visual-response strength in the FEF. Toward this end, we monitored neuronal activity in two male monkeys while presenting first a visual cue predicting with high probability that the reward delivered at the end of the trial would be good or bad (large or small) and then a visual cue announcing the size of the impending reward with certainty. The second cue usually confirmed but occasionally violated the expectation set up by the first cue. Neurons responded more strongly to the second cue when it violated than when it confirmed expectation. The increase in the firing rate was accompanied by a decrease in spike-count correlation as expected from capture of attention. Although both good surprise and bad surprise induced enhanced firing, the effects appeared to arise from distinct mechanisms as indicated by the fact that the bad-surprise signal appeared at a longer latency than the good-surprise signal and by the fact that the strength of the two signals varied independently across neurons.

摘要

额眼区(FEF)在视觉注意力控制中起着既定的作用。如果刺激因其显著性而通过其显著性来捕获空间注意力,那么刺激对 FEF 神经元的反应强度会增强。认知因素以及物理属性都可以使刺激变得显著。其中包括惊喜。本实验的目的是确定惊喜引起的显著性是否会导致 FEF 中的视觉反应强度增强。为此,我们在两只雄性猴子中监测神经元活动,首先呈现一个视觉提示,该提示以很高的概率预测在试验结束时提供的奖励是好是坏(大或小),然后呈现一个视觉提示,以确定即将到来的奖励的大小。第二个提示通常会确认,但偶尔会违反第一个提示所建立的期望。当第二个提示违反期望时,神经元的反应比确认期望时更强烈。与预期一致,随着注意的捕获,发射率的增加伴随着尖峰计数相关性的降低。虽然好惊喜和坏惊喜都能增强放电,但事实表明,这两种效应似乎来自不同的机制,因为坏惊喜信号的潜伏期比好惊喜信号长,并且两个信号的强度在神经元之间独立变化。