• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

小切口(5 毫米)筋膜关闭对开放式结直肠癌手术后切口疝发生率的影响:随机临床试验。

Impact of small-bite (5 mm) fascial closure on the incidence of incisional hernia following open colorectal cancer surgery: randomized clinical trial.

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Mersin University, Mersin, Turkey.

Department of Biostatistics, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey.

出版信息

Br J Surg. 2024 Aug 2;111(8). doi: 10.1093/bjs/znae189.

DOI:10.1093/bjs/znae189
PMID:39107062
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Incisional hernia is frequently observed after open colorectal cancer surgery, and should be considered a serious short- and long-term health issue. The present study evaluated the efficacy of small-bite abdominal closure in reducing the incidence of incisional hernia in this patient group.

METHODS

An RCT was conducted between June 2019 and June 2022. A total of 173 patients who underwent open colorectal cancer surgery were assigned randomly to one of two groups to undergo fascial closure with either small bites (87) or conventional bites (86). The incisional hernia rate was accepted as the primary outcome, and surgical-site infection as the secondary outcome.

RESULTS

The incisional hernia rates at 1 year were 7 and 27% in the small- and conventional-bite groups respectively (P < 0.001). This rate increased to 9 and 31% at the end of the second year (P < 0.001). Surgical-site infections occurred in 18% of the small-bite group and 31% of the conventional-bite group (P = 0.03). Compared with the conventional-bite group, the small-bite group had higher suture/wound length ratios (mean(s.d.) 5.18(0.84) versus 3.67(0.57); P < 0.001) and a longer fascial closure time 14.1(4.64) versus 12.9(2.39) min; P = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Small-bite closure with 5-mm tissue bites placed 5 mm apart reduced the incidence of incisional hernia and surgical-site infection after open colorectal cancer surgery.

摘要

背景

切口疝是开放式结直肠癌手术后常见的并发症,应被视为严重的短期和长期健康问题。本研究评估了小切口腹部关闭技术在降低该患者组切口疝发生率方面的疗效。

方法

一项 RCT 于 2019 年 6 月至 2022 年 6 月进行。共有 173 例接受开放式结直肠癌手术的患者被随机分配至两组,分别采用小切口(87 例)或常规切口(86 例)进行筋膜关闭。切口疝发生率被接受为主要结局,手术部位感染为次要结局。

结果

小切口组和常规切口组 1 年时的切口疝发生率分别为 7%和 27%(P<0.001)。第二年结束时,这一比例分别上升至 9%和 31%(P<0.001)。小切口组的手术部位感染发生率为 18%,常规切口组为 31%(P=0.03)。与常规切口组相比,小切口组的缝合/伤口长度比更高(平均(标准差)5.18(0.84)比 3.67(0.57);P<0.001),筋膜关闭时间也更长[14.1(4.64)比 12.9(2.39)min;P=0.03]。

结论

采用 5-mm 组织切口、间隔 5mm 进行小切口关闭可降低开放式结直肠癌手术后切口疝和手术部位感染的发生率。

相似文献

1
Impact of small-bite (5 mm) fascial closure on the incidence of incisional hernia following open colorectal cancer surgery: randomized clinical trial.小切口(5 毫米)筋膜关闭对开放式结直肠癌手术后切口疝发生率的影响:随机临床试验。
Br J Surg. 2024 Aug 2;111(8). doi: 10.1093/bjs/znae189.
2
Superiority trial for the development of an ideal method for the closure of midline abdominal wall incisions to reduce the incidence of wound complications after elective gastroenterological surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.经腹正中切口关闭术以减少择期胃肠外科手术后切口并发症发生率的理想方法的开发:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2024 May 17;25(1):327. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08167-w.
3
Incisional hernia following colorectal cancer surgery according to suture technique: Hughes Abdominal Repair Randomized Trial (HART).结直肠癌手术后切口疝的缝合技术:Hughes 腹部修复随机试验(HART)。
Br J Surg. 2022 Sep 9;109(10):943-950. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znac198.
4
Interrupted versus continuous fascial closure in patients undergoing emergent laparotomy: A randomized controlled trial.间断缝合与连续缝合在急诊剖腹术中的应用:一项随机对照试验。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018 Sep;85(3):459-465. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001970.
5
Small bite fascial closure technique reduces incisional hernia rates in gynecologic oncology patients.小切口筋膜关闭技术降低妇科肿瘤患者的切口疝发生率。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2024 May 6;34(5):745-750. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2023-004966.
6
Reinforced tension-line suture after laparotomy: early results of the Rein4CeTo1 randomized clinical trial.剖腹术后强化张力线缝合:Rein4CeTo1 随机临床试验的早期结果。
Br J Surg. 2024 Sep 3;111(10). doi: 10.1093/bjs/znae265.
7
Hughes abdominal closure versus standard mass closure to reduce incisional hernias following surgery for colorectal cancer: the HART RCT.Hughes 腹部关闭术与标准质量关闭术在减少结直肠癌手术后切口疝中的比较:HART RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2022 Aug;26(34):1-100. doi: 10.3310/CMWC8368.
8
Small bite versus large bite stitching technique for midline laparotomy wound closure: A systematic review and meta-analysis.小切口与大切口缝合技术在正中切口缝合中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Asian J Surg. 2023 Nov;46(11):4719-4726. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2023.08.124. Epub 2023 Aug 30.
9
Hughes Abdominal Repair Trial (HART)-abdominal wall closure techniques to reduce the incidence of incisional hernias: feasibility trial for a multicentre, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial.休斯腹部修复试验(HART)——降低切口疝发生率的腹壁闭合技术:一项多中心、实用、随机对照试验的可行性试验
BMJ Open. 2017 Dec 19;7(12):e017235. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017235.
10
Abdominal incision defect following AAA-surgery (AIDA): 2-year results of prophylactic onlay-mesh augmentation in a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial.腹切口缺损在 AAA 手术后(AIDA):多中心、双盲、随机对照试验中预防性覆盖补片增强的 2 年结果。
Updates Surg. 2022 Jun;74(3):1105-1116. doi: 10.1007/s13304-021-01125-0. Epub 2021 Jul 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Small-bites versus large-bites closure of midline laparotomies: A systematic review and meta-analysis.中线剖腹手术小切口与大切口缝合的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Colorectal Dis. 2025 Mar;27(3):e70073. doi: 10.1111/codi.70073.
2
Variable use of modern abdominal wall closure techniques at emergency laparotomy - an international, cross-sectional survey of surgical practice.急诊剖腹手术中现代腹壁关闭技术的使用差异——一项关于手术实践的国际横断面调查
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025 Mar 18;51(1):141. doi: 10.1007/s00068-025-02804-y.
3
Safety and efficacy of prophylactic onlay resorbable synthetic mesh with a comprehensive wound bundle at laparotomy closure in high-risk emergency abdominal surgery: an observational study.
预防性外置可吸收合成补片联合综合伤口处理包用于高危急诊腹部手术剖腹术关闭切口的安全性和有效性:一项观察性研究
World J Emerg Surg. 2025 Mar 6;20(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s13017-025-00579-6.
4
Are eviscerations preventable?脏器脱出能否预防?
Rev Col Bras Cir. 2025 Feb 21;52:e20253814. doi: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20253814-en. eCollection 2025.