• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新加坡军事人口中牙科症状检查器网络应用程序的准确性。

Accuracy of Dental Symptom Checker Web Application in the Singapore Military Population.

作者信息

Lim Songping Nicholas, Woon Xuan Ru, Goh Enhui Charlene, Ng Jingwen Claudia, Ang Seng Yao, Lim Teong Joe, Allen Patrick Finbarr

机构信息

Division of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Dental Branch, Singapore Armed Forces Medical Corps, Singapore.

Moh Holdings PTE Ltd, Singapore.

出版信息

Int Dent J. 2025 Apr;75(2):1148-1154. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2024.07.006. Epub 2024 Aug 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.identj.2024.07.006
PMID:39107150
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11976474/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Symptom checkers (SCs) are virtual health aids to assist laypersons in self-assessing dental complaints. This study aimed to investigate the triage performance, clinical efficacy, and user-perceived utility of a prototype dental SC, Toothbuddy, in assessing unscheduled dental complaints in Singapore.

METHODS

A pilot trial was conducted amongst all unscheduled dental attendees to military dental facilities in Singapore from January to May 2023. The accuracy of Toothbuddy to tele-triage dental conditions into 3 categories-routine, urgent, and emergency-was determined. Based on the patient-reported symptoms input, clinical recommendations were provided to users for each category. Thereafter, all dental attendees were clinically assessed to determine the definitive category. Finally, a user questionnaire assessed the application's functionality and utility and the user's satisfaction. Sensitivity and specificity analyses were performed.

RESULTS

During the study, 588 patients with unscheduled dental visits presented. Of these cases, 275 (46.8%) were evaluated to be routine dental conditions for which treatment could be delayed or self-managed, 243 (41.3%) required urgent dental care, and 60 (10.2%) required emergency dental intervention. The accuracy of Toothbuddy in identifying the correct category was 79.6% (468/588). Sensitivity and specificity in categorising routine vs non-routine conditions were 94.5% (95% confidence interval, 92.0%-97.1%) and 74.0% (95% confidence interval, 68.8%-79.2%), respectively. The app was generally well received and rated highly.

CONCLUSIONS

Preliminary data suggest that Toothbuddy can perform accurate dental self-assessment for a suitable range of common dental concerns and this is a promising platform for virtual advice on spontaneous dental issues. Furthermore, dental facilities are typically not sized to handle the large volumes of unplanned dental visits that may occur in the military population. SC apps to self-manage or delay treatment without adversely affecting disease prognosis may preserve the limited bandwidth of dental facilities in providing acute care and managing true dental emergencies expediently.

摘要

目的

症状检查器(SCs)是一种虚拟健康辅助工具,可帮助外行人自我评估牙齿问题。本研究旨在调查一款牙科症状检查器原型Toothbuddy在评估新加坡非预约牙齿问题时的分诊性能、临床疗效以及用户感知的效用。

方法

于2023年1月至5月在新加坡所有前往军事牙科设施的非预约牙科就诊者中进行了一项试点试验。确定了Toothbuddy将牙齿状况远程分诊为常规、紧急和急诊三类的准确性。根据患者报告输入的症状,为每个类别向用户提供临床建议。此后,对所有牙科就诊者进行临床评估以确定最终类别。最后,通过用户问卷评估该应用程序的功能和效用以及用户满意度。进行了敏感性和特异性分析。

结果

在研究期间,共有588名非预约牙科就诊患者。其中,275例(46.8%)被评估为常规牙齿状况,治疗可延迟或自我管理;243例(41.3%)需要紧急牙科护理;60例(10.2%)需要紧急牙科干预。Toothbuddy识别正确类别的准确率为79.6%(468/588)。在区分常规与非常规状况时,敏感性和特异性分别为94.5%(95%置信区间,92.0%-97.1%)和74.0%(95%置信区间,68.8%-79.2%)。该应用程序总体上受到好评且评分很高。

结论

初步数据表明,Toothbuddy可以对一系列合适的常见牙齿问题进行准确的自我评估,这是一个为自发牙齿问题提供虚拟建议的有前景的平台。此外,牙科设施的规模通常不足以应对军事人群中可能出现的大量非计划牙科就诊。能够自我管理或延迟治疗且不会对疾病预后产生不利影响的症状检查器应用程序,可能会在提供急性护理和有效管理真正的牙科急诊方面,保留牙科设施有限的资源。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fca/11976474/80904d5cfd2d/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fca/11976474/80904d5cfd2d/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fca/11976474/80904d5cfd2d/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Accuracy of Dental Symptom Checker Web Application in the Singapore Military Population.新加坡军事人口中牙科症状检查器网络应用程序的准确性。
Int Dent J. 2025 Apr;75(2):1148-1154. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2024.07.006. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
2
Evaluation of Diagnostic and Triage Accuracy and Usability of a Symptom Checker in an Emergency Department: Observational Study.在急诊科评估诊断和分诊准确性及症状检查器的可用性:观察性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Sep 19;10(9):e38364. doi: 10.2196/38364.
3
Triage Accuracy of Symptom Checker Apps: 5-Year Follow-up Evaluation.症状检查器应用程序的分诊准确性:5 年随访评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 May 10;24(5):e31810. doi: 10.2196/31810.
4
Benchmarking Triage Capability of Symptom Checkers Against That of Medical Laypersons: Survey Study.基于症状检查器和医学门外汉分诊能力的基准测试:调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 10;23(3):e24475. doi: 10.2196/24475.
5
A Symptom-Checker for Adult Patients Visiting an Interdisciplinary Emergency Care Center and the Safety of Patient Self-Triage: Real-Life Prospective Evaluation.成人患者就诊于多学科急诊中心的症状自查工具和患者自我分诊的安全性:真实世界前瞻性评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jun 27;26:e58157. doi: 10.2196/58157.
6
Patient Experience and Feedback After Using an Electronic Health Record-Integrated COVID-19 Symptom Checker: Survey Study.使用集成电子健康记录的 COVID-19 症状检查器后的患者体验与反馈:调查研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Sep 13;9(3):e40064. doi: 10.2196/40064.
7
Exploring Laypersons' Experiences With a Mobile Symptom Checker App as an Interface Between eHealth Literacy, Health Literacy, and Health-Related Behavior: Qualitative Interview Study.探索非专业人士使用移动症状检查应用程序的体验,作为电子健康素养、健康素养与健康相关行为之间的接口:定性访谈研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Mar 21;9:e60647. doi: 10.2196/60647.
8
Performance of a new symptom checker in patient triage: Canadian cohort study.新型症状检查器在患者分诊中的表现:加拿大队列研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 1;16(12):e0260696. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260696. eCollection 2021.
9
Young Adults' Perspectives on the Use of Symptom Checkers for Self-Triage and Self-Diagnosis: Qualitative Study.年轻人对使用症状检查器进行自我分诊和自我诊断的看法:定性研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Jan 6;7(1):e22637. doi: 10.2196/22637.
10
Health Information Seeking From an Intelligent Web-Based Symptom Checker: Cross-sectional Questionnaire Study.健康信息智能网络症状检查器搜索:横断面问卷调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Aug 19;24(8):e36322. doi: 10.2196/36322.

本文引用的文献

1
Ethical, legal, and social aspects of symptom checker applications: a scoping review.症状检查应用程序的伦理、法律和社会方面:范围综述。
Med Health Care Philos. 2022 Dec;25(4):737-755. doi: 10.1007/s11019-022-10114-y. Epub 2022 Oct 1.
2
Evaluation of Diagnostic and Triage Accuracy and Usability of a Symptom Checker in an Emergency Department: Observational Study.在急诊科评估诊断和分诊准确性及症状检查器的可用性:观察性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Sep 19;10(9):e38364. doi: 10.2196/38364.
3
The diagnostic and triage accuracy of digital and online symptom checker tools: a systematic review.
数字和在线症状检查工具的诊断及分诊准确性:一项系统综述
NPJ Digit Med. 2022 Aug 17;5(1):118. doi: 10.1038/s41746-022-00667-w.
4
Accuracy and effectiveness of teledentistry: a systematic review of systematic reviews.远程牙科的准确性和有效性:系统评价的系统综述
Evid Based Dent. 2022 Jul 8:1-8. doi: 10.1038/s41432-022-0257-8.
5
Safety of Triage Self-assessment Using a Symptom Assessment App for Walk-in Patients in the Emergency Care Setting: Observational Prospective Cross-sectional Study.在急诊环境中使用症状评估应用程序对就诊患者进行分诊自我评估的安全性:观察性前瞻性横断面研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Mar 28;10(3):e32340. doi: 10.2196/32340.
6
Performance of a new symptom checker in patient triage: Canadian cohort study.新型症状检查器在患者分诊中的表现:加拿大队列研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 1;16(12):e0260696. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260696. eCollection 2021.
7
Leaders' support for using online symptom checkers in Finnish primary care: Survey study.领导人对在芬兰初级保健中使用在线症状检查器的支持:调查研究。
Health Informatics J. 2021 Oct-Dec;27(4):14604582211052259. doi: 10.1177/14604582211052259.
8
Reliability of COVID-19 symptom checkers as national triage tools: an international case comparison study.新冠症状筛查工具作为国家分诊工具的可靠性:一项国际病例比较研究。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2021 Oct;28(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2021-100448.
9
Accuracy of online symptom checkers and the potential impact on service utilisation.在线症状检查器的准确性及其对服务利用的潜在影响。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 15;16(7):e0254088. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254088. eCollection 2021.
10
Digital triage: Novel strategies for population health management in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.数字分诊:应对 COVID-19 大流行的人口健康管理新策略。
Healthc (Amst). 2020 Dec;8(4):100493. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2020.100493. Epub 2020 Oct 26.