• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

文化与政治制度：它们如何影响了新冠疫情应对政策的有效性？

Culture and political regimes: How have they influenced the effectiveness of COVID-19 response policy?

作者信息

Wu Peizhen, Sun Zhen

机构信息

Institute of Economics, School of Social Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2024 Jul 9;10(14):e34271. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34271. eCollection 2024 Jul 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34271
PMID:39108893
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11301203/
Abstract

This study investigates the efficacy of national emergency response policies in addressing the COVID-19 pandemic and their interactions with cultural and political factors. Employing the synthetic control method, we analyze data from countries on five continents that implemented such policies in early 2020. Our results indicate the overall effectiveness of these policies in mitigating the impact of COVID-19 yet reveal significant variability in their outcomes among countries. Notably, we identify a negative association between policy effectiveness and a culture characterized by individualism. Additionally, we observe that the impact of COVID-19 response measures is more prominent in countries with lower levels of democracy. These findings offer valuable insights into the intricate interplay between COVID-19 response policies, cultural dynamics, and political regimes, with potential implications for future policy decisions and research endeavors.

摘要

本研究调查了国家应急政策在应对新冠疫情方面的有效性及其与文化和政治因素的相互作用。我们采用合成控制法，分析了2020年初实施此类政策的五大洲国家的数据。我们的结果表明，这些政策在减轻新冠疫情影响方面总体有效，但各国的政策结果存在显著差异。值得注意的是，我们发现政策有效性与个人主义文化之间存在负相关。此外，我们观察到，新冠疫情应对措施在民主程度较低的国家影响更为显著。这些发现为新冠疫情应对政策、文化动态和政治体制之间的复杂相互作用提供了宝贵见解，对未来的政策决策和研究工作具有潜在影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b58/11301203/b9022396c242/gr8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b58/11301203/b82dfc9be5f6/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b58/11301203/c0882e64db10/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b58/11301203/9047596e6391/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b58/11301203/9d0f07b2be9a/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b58/11301203/85e4a6f26910/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b58/11301203/627264c3337c/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b58/11301203/c319d548cd17/gr7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b58/11301203/b9022396c242/gr8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b58/11301203/b82dfc9be5f6/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b58/11301203/c0882e64db10/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b58/11301203/9047596e6391/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b58/11301203/9d0f07b2be9a/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b58/11301203/85e4a6f26910/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b58/11301203/627264c3337c/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b58/11301203/c319d548cd17/gr7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b58/11301203/b9022396c242/gr8.jpg

相似文献

1
Culture and political regimes: How have they influenced the effectiveness of COVID-19 response policy?文化与政治制度：它们如何影响了新冠疫情应对政策的有效性？
Heliyon. 2024 Jul 9;10(14):e34271. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34271. eCollection 2024 Jul 30.
2
How culture orientation influences the COVID-19 pandemic: An empirical analysis.文化取向如何影响新冠疫情：一项实证分析。
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 29;13:899730. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.899730. eCollection 2022.
3
Beyond the surface: accounting for confounders in understanding the link between collectivism and COVID-19 pandemic in the United States.超越表面：在理解集体主义与美国 COVID-19 大流行之间的联系时，需要考虑混杂因素。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Aug 9;23(1):1513. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16384-2.
4
Public sector reforms and their impact on the level of corruption: A systematic review.公共部门改革及其对腐败程度的影响：一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 May 24;17(2):e1173. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1173. eCollection 2021 Jun.
5
The relationship between measures of individualism and collectivism and the impact of COVID-19 across nations.个人主义与集体主义衡量标准之间的关系以及新冠疫情在各国的影响。
Public Health Pract (Oxf). 2021 Nov;2:100143. doi: 10.1016/j.puhip.2021.100143. Epub 2021 May 17.
6
Flexible societies excelled in saving lives in the first phase of the COVID-19 pandemic.在新冠疫情的第一阶段，灵活应变的社会在拯救生命方面表现出色。
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 26;13:924385. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.924385. eCollection 2022.
7
Cultural dynamics influencing decision-making during the COVID-19 pandemic: the Italian case.影响新冠疫情期间决策的文化动态：以意大利为例。
Front Psychol. 2024 Apr 25;15:1294190. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1294190. eCollection 2024.
8
Democratic quality and excess mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠大流行期间的民主质量与超额死亡率。
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 4;14(1):7948. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55523-6.
9
Individualism-Collectivism and COVID-19 Prevention Behaviors in Young Adults: The Indirect Effects of Psychological Distress and Pandemic Fears.个人主义-集体主义与年轻人的新冠疫情预防行为：心理困扰和疫情恐惧的间接影响
J Psychol. 2023;157(8):496-515. doi: 10.1080/00223980.2023.2250057. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
10
Government, politics and health policy: A quantitative analysis of 30 European countries.政府、政治与卫生政策：对30个欧洲国家的定量分析
Health Policy. 2015 Oct;119(10):1298-308. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.08.017. Epub 2015 Sep 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Security or severity? A research of COVID-19 pandemic control policy based on nonlinear programming approach.安全还是严峻性？基于非线性规划方法的新冠疫情防控政策研究
Heliyon. 2023 Nov 7;9(11):e21080. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21080. eCollection 2023 Nov.
2
Glycaemic monitoring and control among high-risk patients with type 2 diabetes in Australian general practice during COVID-19.在 COVID-19 大流行期间，澳大利亚全科医疗中 2 型糖尿病高危患者的血糖监测和控制情况。
Fam Med Community Health. 2023 Aug;11(3). doi: 10.1136/fmch-2023-002271.
3
Disease and democracy: Political regimes and countries responsiveness to COVID-19.
疾病与民主：政治体制与各国对新冠疫情的应对
J Econ Behav Organ. 2023 Aug;212:290-299. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2023.04.034. Epub 2023 May 8.
4
The COVID-19 curtain: Can past communist regimes explain the vaccination divide in Europe?新冠大流行的“隔离幕”：共产主义政权能否解释欧洲的疫苗接种鸿沟？
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Mar;321:115759. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115759. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
5
Political views, health literacy, and COVID-19 beliefs and behaviors: A moderated mediation model.政治观点、健康素养与 COVID-19 信念和行为：一个有调节的中介模型。
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Mar;320:115672. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115672. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
6
Willingness to Use Mobile Health Devices in the Post-COVID-19 Era: Nationwide Cross-sectional Study in China.后 COVID-19 时代使用移动医疗设备的意愿：中国全国性横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Feb 17;25:e44225. doi: 10.2196/44225.
7
State mask mandates and psychological reactance theory: The role of political partisanship and COVID-19 risk in mask adoption and resistance.州口罩令与心理抗拒理论：政治党派立场和 COVID-19 风险在口罩采纳和抵制中的作用。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Dec;314:115479. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115479. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
8
COVID-19 and beyond: how lessons and evidence from implementation research can benefit health systems' response and preparedness for COVID-19 and future epidemics.新冠疫情与未来：实施研究的经验和证据如何使卫生系统更好地应对和准备新冠疫情及未来的疫情
Fam Med Community Health. 2021 Sep;9(4). doi: 10.1136/fmch-2021-001150.
9
Examining the economic impact of COVID-19 in India through daily electricity consumption and nighttime light intensity.通过每日用电量和夜间灯光强度审视新冠疫情对印度的经济影响。
World Dev. 2021 Apr;140:105287. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105287. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
10
Democracy and COVID-19 outcomes.民主与新冠疫情结果。
Econ Lett. 2021 Jun;203:109840. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2021.109840. Epub 2021 Mar 27.