• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

民主与新冠疫情结果。

Democracy and COVID-19 outcomes.

作者信息

Karabulut Gokhan, Zimmermann Klaus F, Bilgin Mehmet Huseyin, Doker Asli Cansin

机构信息

Istanbul University, Turkey.

Global Labor Organization (GLO), Germany.

出版信息

Econ Lett. 2021 Jun;203:109840. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2021.109840. Epub 2021 Mar 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.econlet.2021.109840
PMID:33814654
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7997903/
Abstract

More democratic countries are often expected to fail at providing a fast, strong, and effective response when facing a crisis such as COVID-19. This could result in higher infections and more negative health effects, but hard evidence to prove this claim is missing for the new disease. Studying the association with five different democracy measures, this study shows that while the infection rates of the disease do indeed appear to be higher for more democratic countries so far, their observed case fatality rates are lower. There is also a negative association between case fatality rates and government attempts to censor media. However, such censorship relates positively to the infection rate.

摘要

人们通常认为,在面对像新冠疫情这样的危机时,民主程度更高的国家往往难以做出迅速、有力且有效的应对。这可能会导致更高的感染率以及更严重的负面健康影响,但对于这种新疾病,却缺乏确凿证据来证实这一说法。通过研究与五种不同民主衡量标准之间的关联,本研究表明,虽然到目前为止,民主程度更高的国家该疾病的感染率确实似乎更高,但其观察到的病死率却更低。病死率与政府审查媒体的企图之间也存在负相关。然而,这种审查与感染率呈正相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf24/7997903/ae308e323fdb/fx1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf24/7997903/ae308e323fdb/fx1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf24/7997903/ae308e323fdb/fx1_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
Democracy and COVID-19 outcomes.民主与新冠疫情结果。
Econ Lett. 2021 Jun;203:109840. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2021.109840. Epub 2021 Mar 27.
2
Democracy and case fatality rate of COVID-19 at early stage of pandemic: a multicountry study.疫情早期的民主与 COVID-19 病死率:一项多国研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Feb;29(6):8694-8704. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16250-x. Epub 2021 Sep 7.
3
Good democratic governance can combat COVID-19 - excess mortality analysis.良好的民主治理能够抗击新冠疫情——超额死亡率分析
Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2022 Dec;83:103437. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103437. Epub 2022 Nov 12.
4
Disease and democracy: Political regimes and countries responsiveness to COVID-19.疾病与民主:政治体制与各国对新冠疫情的应对
J Econ Behav Organ. 2023 Aug;212:290-299. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2023.04.034. Epub 2023 May 8.
5
[Democracy and Covid-19 mortality in Europe.].[欧洲的民主与新冠疫情死亡率。]
Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2020 Jun 24;94:e202006073.
6
Impact of lockdown on Covid-19 case fatality rate and viral mutations spread in 7 countries in Europe and North America.封锁对欧洲和北美 7 个国家的新冠病毒病死率和病毒突变传播的影响。
J Transl Med. 2020 Sep 2;18(1):338. doi: 10.1186/s12967-020-02501-x.
7
The early COVID-19 pandemic and democratic attitudes.新冠疫情早期与民主态度
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 22;16(6):e0253485. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253485. eCollection 2021.
8
COVID-19 Science Policy, Experts, and Publics: Why Epistemic Democracy Matters in Ecological Crises.新冠病毒科学政策、专家和公众:生态危机中认识论民主为何重要。
OMICS. 2020 Aug;24(8):479-482. doi: 10.1089/omi.2020.0083. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
9
The relationships between democratic experience, adult health, and cause-specific mortality in 170 countries between 1980 and 2016: an observational analysis.1980 年至 2016 年期间 170 个国家的民主经验、成年人健康与特定病因死亡率之间的关系:一项观察性分析。
Lancet. 2019 Apr 20;393(10181):1628-1640. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30235-1. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
10
Democracy and health: Evidence from within-country heterogeneity in the Congo.民主与健康:来自刚果国内异质性的证据。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Dec;194:10-16. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.10.008. Epub 2017 Oct 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Potential Global Effects of the Rise of the Far Right on Public Health.极右翼势力崛起对公共卫生的潜在全球影响。
Am J Public Health. 2025 Jun;115(6):873-882. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2025.308016. Epub 2025 Apr 10.
2
Determinants of COVID-19 vaccination coverage in European and Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries.欧洲及经济合作与发展组织(经合组织)国家新冠疫苗接种覆盖率的决定因素。
Front Public Health. 2024 Dec 31;12:1466858. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1466858. eCollection 2024.
3
[Analysis of the institutional capabilities of the Guatemalan Ministry of Health: democratic constraint, defunding, reforms, and model of care].

本文引用的文献

1
The COVID-19 pandemic and the 2020 US presidential election.2019冠状病毒病大流行与2020年美国总统选举。
J Popul Econ. 2021;34(2):739-767. doi: 10.1007/s00148-020-00820-3. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
2
Who is wearing a mask? Gender-, age-, and location-related differences during the COVID-19 pandemic.谁在戴口罩?新冠疫情期间与性别、年龄和地点相关的口罩使用差异。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 15;15(10):e0240785. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240785. eCollection 2020.
3
Inter-country distancing, globalisation and the coronavirus pandemic.国家间的距离、全球化与新冠疫情
[危地马拉卫生部的机构能力分析:民主制约、资金削减、改革与护理模式]
Cad Saude Publica. 2024 Nov 25;40(11):e00027924. doi: 10.1590/0102-311XES027924. eCollection 2024.
4
Culture and political regimes: How have they influenced the effectiveness of COVID-19 response policy?文化与政治制度:它们如何影响了新冠疫情应对政策的有效性?
Heliyon. 2024 Jul 9;10(14):e34271. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34271. eCollection 2024 Jul 30.
5
The determinants of COVID-19 case reporting across Africa.非洲各地 COVID-19 病例报告的决定因素。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jun 27;12:1406363. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1406363. eCollection 2024.
6
Legislative incapacity and underreporting of COVID-19 mortality.立法无行为能力与新冠疫情死亡人数报告不足。
Prev Med Rep. 2024 Mar 20;41:102694. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102694. eCollection 2024 May.
7
COVID-19 and democracy: a scoping review.COVID-19 与民主:范围综述。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Aug 30;23(1):1668. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16172-y.
8
Face mask is an efficient tool to fight the Covid-19 pandemic and some factors increase the probability of its adoption.口罩是抗击新冠疫情的有效工具,一些因素增加了其采用的概率。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jun 6;13(1):9218. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-34776-7.
9
Coronavirus-Related Searches on the Internet Predict COVID-19 Vaccination Rates in the Real World: A Behavioral Immune System Perspective.互联网上与冠状病毒相关的搜索可预测现实世界中的新冠疫苗接种率:行为免疫系统视角
Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2023 Jun;14(5):572-587. doi: 10.1177/19485506221106012. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
10
Individualism, economic development, and democracy as determinants of COVID-19 risk information on 132 government websites.个人主义、经济发展和民主作为132个政府网站上新冠疫情风险信息的决定因素。
Prev Med Rep. 2023 Aug;34:102242. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102242. Epub 2023 May 13.
World Econ. 2020 Jun;43(6):1484-1498. doi: 10.1111/twec.12969. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
4
Multivariate Analysis of Black Race and Environmental Temperature on COVID-19 in the US.美国新冠疫情中黑色人种和环境温度的多元分析
Am J Med Sci. 2020 Oct;360(4):348-356. doi: 10.1016/j.amjms.2020.06.015. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
5
Clinical features of COVID-19 in elderly patients: A comparison with young and middle-aged patients.老年 COVID-19 患者的临床特征:与中青年患者的比较。
J Infect. 2020 Jun;80(6):e14-e18. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.03.005. Epub 2020 Mar 27.
6
Health and Democracy.健康与民主。
Am Econ Rev. 2006 May;96(2):313-8. doi: 10.1257/000282806777212053.
7
Health Care Expenditure and Income: A Global Perspective.医疗保健支出与收入:全球视角
Health Econ. 2017 Jul;26(7):863-874. doi: 10.1002/hec.3424. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
8
Why do some countries spend more for health? An assessment of sociopolitical determinants and international aid for government health expenditures.为什么一些国家在医疗保健上投入更多?社会政治决定因素与政府医疗支出国际援助评估。
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Aug;114:161-8. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.05.044. Epub 2014 May 29.
9
Democratization and life expectancy in Europe, 1960-2008.民主化与欧洲的预期寿命,1960-2008 年。
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Sep;93:166-75. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.05.010. Epub 2013 May 18.
10
Case fatality: rate, ratio, or risk?病死率:率、比值还是风险?
Epidemiology. 2013 Jul;24(4):622-3. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e318296c2b6.