Comparing cadaveric and 3D-printed laryngeal models in transcutaneous injection laryngoplasty.

BACKGROUND

There is increasing focus on the development of high-quality simulation models for medical education. Cadaveric models, although considered more realistic, may be difficult to obtain and costly. The advent of three-dimensional (3D) printing has offered a low-cost, reliable, and reproducible alternative. This study sought to compare the utility of 3D-printed to cadaveric models for training in transcutaneous injection laryngoplasty (TIL).

METHODS

A simulation course with a cross-over design was employed. Video laryngoscopes were utilized for both the 3D and cadaveric models to assess the accuracy of injection into the vocal fold. Pre-procedure and post-procedure surveys were administered to evaluate understanding and comfort level on a Likert scale of 1-10. Each model was also rated on a 1-5 Likert scale for self-efficacy, fidelity, and educational value.

RESULTS

Pre- and post-survey data were completed by 15 otolaryngology residents and medical students. Mean pre-seminar understanding and comfort level were 3.7 and 2.2, respectively, compared to 6.9 and 5.9 ( < .05) following use of the 3D model and 6.4 and 4.7 ( < .05) following use of the cadaver model. When comparing 3D and cadaveric models, no significant differences were observed regarding self-efficacy, fidelity, and educational value.

CONCLUSION

There was a similar mean increase in understanding and comfort following use of the 3D and cadaveric models. 3D-printing can provide an excellent adjunct to, and eventually a potential replacement for hands-on cadaveric training in medical education, particularly for TIL.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.