Acad Med. 2024 Nov 1;99(11):1191-1198. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005833. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
Professional identity development (PID) has become an important focus of medical education. To date, contributions of basic science education to physician PID have not been broadly explored. This review explores the literature surrounding the contribution of basic science education to the PID of medical learners and interprets findings critically in terms of the landscapes of practice (LoP) framework.
In this critical scoping review, the authors searched 12 different databases and professional organization websites from January 1988 to October 2022 for references relating to how, if at all, the basic science component of medical education contributes to the PID of medical learners. The LoP learning theory was chosen as a framework for critically interpreting the identified articles.
Of the 6,674 identified references, 257 met the inclusion criteria. After data extraction, content analysis of recorded key findings was used to ensure all findings were incorporated into the synthesis. Findings aligned with and were critically interpreted in relation to the 3 LoP modes of identification: engagement (engaging in the work of a physician), imagination (imagining oneself becoming a "good doctor"), and alignment (aligning with the practices and expectations of a medical community or specialty). Within each mode of identification, it was possible to see how basic science may support, or catalyze, PID and how basic science may serve as a barrier, or an inhibitor, to PID or contribute to the development of negative aspects of identity development.
The LoP learning theory suggests that the effect of basic science on physicians' PID is most effective if educators view themselves as guides through interfaces between their scientific disciplines and medicine. Learners need opportunities to be engaged, to imagine how their current learning activities and developing skills will be useful as future physicians, and to feel alignment with medical specialties.
专业身份发展(PID)已成为医学教育的重要焦点。迄今为止,基础科学教育对医师 PID 的贡献尚未得到广泛探索。本综述探讨了基础科学教育对医学学习者 PID 的贡献的文献,并根据实践景观(LoP)框架批判性地解释研究结果。
在本次批判性范围界定综述中,作者从 1988 年 1 月至 2022 年 10 月,在 12 个不同的数据库和专业组织网站上搜索了与基础医学教育如何(如果有的话)促进医学学习者 PID 相关的参考文献。选择 LoP 学习理论作为批判性解释已确定文章的框架。
在确定的 6674 条参考文献中,有 257 条符合纳入标准。提取数据后,对记录的关键发现进行内容分析,以确保所有发现均纳入综合分析。研究结果与 LoP 的 3 种认同模式一致,并进行了批判性解释:参与(参与医生的工作)、想象(想象自己成为一名“好医生”)和对齐(与医疗社区或专业的实践和期望保持一致)。在每种认同模式中,都可以看到基础科学如何支持或促进 PID,以及基础科学如何成为 PID 的障碍或抑制剂,或促进身份发展的负面方面。
LoP 学习理论表明,如果教育工作者将自己视为其科学学科与医学之间的接口的指导者,那么基础科学对医师 PID 的影响将是最有效的。学习者需要有机会参与其中,想象他们目前的学习活动和发展技能将如何作为未来医生有用,并感受到与医学专业的一致性。