A Falls Prevention Program for People After Stroke in Guyana: An International Collaboration.

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to describe the social, environmental, and cultural adaptations to an existing falls program and assess acceptability and preliminary effectiveness of the program in reducing fear, reducing falls, and improving function among individuals poststroke in Guyana.

METHODS

A quasi-experimental pilot study with a pretest/posttest in-group design was developed through a collaboration of researchers in Guyana and the US. Participants took part in the falls prevention program for 8 weeks. Outcome measures included a 10-m walk test, the Five Times Sit to Stand Test, and subjective questionnaires for falls incidence and balance confidence at the beginning and end.

RESULTS

Twenty participants completed the study. One participant experienced medical complications, and their data were excluded from analysis. Fifteen participants (78.9%) demonstrated improvements in comfortable and fast walking speed. Twelve participants completed the Five Times Sit to Stand Test. Eleven (91.67%) improved their time at the posttest, with 9 (81.8%) demonstrating a clinically important improvement. Nineteen participants had sustained at least 1 fall prior to the study. Only 1 participant reported a fall during the program. Initially, the majority of participants (11/19) were very concerned about falling. At the end, only 1 was very concerned about falling, and the majority (15/19) were not concerned at all. Posttest surveys of participants indicated acceptability of the program.

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot program helped reduce fall risk and improve confidence, gait speed, and community mobility of the study participants. Future research at other rehabilitation departments in Guyana would help increase the generalizability of the program.

IMPACT

The program can be used clinically by physical therapists in Guyana, both in departments and as a home program. Shared knowledge and experience of researchers considering research evidence and the environmental, social, and economic conditions of people living in Guyana were important in developing an effective program.