• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探讨多器官功能障碍在脓毒症相关性弥散性血管内凝血中的中介作用及其对预后恶化的影响。

Exploring the Mediating Role of Multiple Organ Dysfunction in Sepsis-Induced Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation and Its Impact on Worsening Prognosis.

机构信息

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China.

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China.

出版信息

Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2024 Jan-Dec;30:10760296241271358. doi: 10.1177/10760296241271358.

DOI:10.1177/10760296241271358
PMID:39109998
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11307354/
Abstract

Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) poses a high mortality risk, yet its exact impact remains contentious. This study investigates DIC's association with mortality in individuals with sepsis, emphasizing multiple organ function. Using data from the Peking University People's Hospital Investigation on Sepsis-Induced Coagulopathy database, we categorized patients into DIC and non-DIC groups based on DIC scores within 24 h of ICU admission (< 5 cutoff). ICU mortality was the main outcome. Initial data comparison preceded logistic regression analysis of mortality factors post-propensity score matching (PSM). Employing mediation analysis estimated direct and indirect associations. Of 549 participants, 131 were in the DIC group, with the remaining 418 in the non-DIC group. Following baseline characteristic presentation, PSM was conducted, revealing significantly higher nonplatelet sequential organ failure assessment (nonplt-SOFA) scores (6.3 ± 2.7 vs 5.0 ± 2.5, P < 0.001) and in-hospital mortality rates (47.3% vs 29.5%, P = 0.003) in the DIC group. A significant correlation between DIC and in-hospital mortality persisted (OR 2.15, 95% CI 1.29-3.59, P = 0.003), with nonplt-SOFA scores (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.05-1.28, P = 0.004) and hemorrhage (OR 2.33, 95% CI 1.08-5.03, P = 0.032) as predictors. The overall effect size was 0.1786 (95% CI 0.0542-0.2886), comprising a direct effect size of 0.1423 (95% CI 0.0153-0.2551) and an indirect effect size of 0.0363 (95% CI 0.0034-0.0739), with approximately 20.3% of effects mediated. These findings underscore DIC's association with increased mortality risk in patients with sepsis, urging anticoagulation focus over bleeding management, with organ dysfunction assessment recommended for anticoagulant treatment efficacy.

摘要

弥散性血管内凝血 (DIC) 死亡率高,但确切影响仍存在争议。本研究探讨了 DIC 与脓毒症患者死亡率的关系,强调了多器官功能。我们利用北京大学人民医院脓毒症诱导凝血障碍数据库的数据,根据患者入住 ICU 24 小时内的 DIC 评分(< 5 分)将患者分为 DIC 组和非 DIC 组。主要观察终点为 ICU 死亡率。在倾向评分匹配(PSM)后,对死亡率的危险因素进行 logistic 回归分析前,先进行初始数据比较。采用中介分析估计直接和间接关联。在 549 名患者中,131 名患者为 DIC 组,其余 418 名患者为非 DIC 组。在展示了基线特征后,我们进行了 PSM,结果显示 DIC 组的非血小板序贯器官衰竭评估(nonplt-SOFA)评分(6.3±2.7 与 5.0±2.5,P<0.001)和住院死亡率(47.3%与 29.5%,P=0.003)明显更高。DIC 与住院死亡率之间存在显著相关性(OR 2.15,95%CI 1.29-3.59,P=0.003),非血小板 SOFA 评分(OR 1.16,95%CI 1.05-1.28,P=0.004)和出血(OR 2.33,95%CI 1.08-5.03,P=0.032)是预测因素。总效应量为 0.1786(95%CI 0.0542-0.2886),其中直接效应量为 0.1423(95%CI 0.0153-0.2551),间接效应量为 0.0363(95%CI 0.0034-0.0739),大约 20.3%的效应为中介效应。这些发现强调了 DIC 与脓毒症患者死亡率增加的关联,促使我们在治疗中更加关注抗凝,而不是出血管理,同时建议评估器官功能障碍以评估抗凝治疗效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd22/11307354/561393d50899/10.1177_10760296241271358-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd22/11307354/70ebfa339159/10.1177_10760296241271358-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd22/11307354/561393d50899/10.1177_10760296241271358-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd22/11307354/70ebfa339159/10.1177_10760296241271358-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd22/11307354/561393d50899/10.1177_10760296241271358-fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Exploring the Mediating Role of Multiple Organ Dysfunction in Sepsis-Induced Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation and Its Impact on Worsening Prognosis.探讨多器官功能障碍在脓毒症相关性弥散性血管内凝血中的中介作用及其对预后恶化的影响。
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2024 Jan-Dec;30:10760296241271358. doi: 10.1177/10760296241271358.
2
Usefulness of Measuring Changes in SOFA Score for the Prediction of 28-Day Mortality in Patients With Sepsis-Associated Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation.SOFA 评分变化对预测脓毒症相关性弥散性血管内凝血患者 28 天死亡率的作用。
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2019 Jan-Dec;25:1076029618824044. doi: 10.1177/1076029618824044.
3
Benefit profile of anticoagulant therapy in sepsis: a nationwide multicentre registry in Japan.脓毒症抗凝治疗的获益情况:日本一项全国性多中心注册研究
Crit Care. 2016 Jul 29;20(1):229. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1415-1.
4
Clinical course and outcome of disseminated intravascular coagulation diagnosed by Japanese Association for Acute Medicine criteria. Comparison between sepsis and trauma.根据日本急性医学协会标准诊断的弥散性血管内凝血的临床病程及转归:脓毒症与创伤的比较
Thromb Haemost. 2008 Dec;100(6):1099-105.
5
Serum thrombomodulin level relates to the clinical course of disseminated intravascular coagulation, multiorgan dysfunction syndrome, and mortality in patients with sepsis.血清血栓调节蛋白水平与脓毒症患者的弥散性血管内凝血、多器官功能障碍综合征的临床病程及死亡率相关。
Crit Care Med. 2008 Mar;36(3):683-9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0B013E31816537D8.
6
Benefit profile of recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin in sepsis-induced disseminated intravascular coagulation: a multicenter propensity score analysis.重组人可溶性血栓调节蛋白在脓毒症诱导的弥散性血管内凝血中的获益情况:一项多中心倾向评分分析
Crit Care. 2015 Mar 3;19(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0810-3.
7
Epidemiology of disseminated intravascular coagulation in sepsis and validation of scoring systems.脓毒症中弥散性血管内凝血的流行病学及评分系统的验证。
J Crit Care. 2019 Apr;50:23-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.11.009. Epub 2018 Nov 14.
8
Analysis of the diagnostic value of coagulation markers and coagulation function indices on the occurrence of DIC in sepsis and its prognosis.分析凝血标志物和凝血功能指标对脓毒症 DIC 发生及其预后的诊断价值。
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 2024 Sep 1;52(5):65-72. doi: 10.15586/aei.v52i5.1119. eCollection 2024.
9
Plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 promotes a poor prognosis in sepsis-induced disseminated intravascular coagulation.纤溶酶原激活物抑制剂1会导致脓毒症诱发的弥散性血管内凝血预后不良。
Int J Hematol. 2006 Dec;84(5):398-405. doi: 10.1532/IJH97.05190.
10
Early Changes in the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score Among Patients With Sepsis-Induced Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation.脓毒症相关性弥散性血管内凝血患者序贯器官衰竭评估评分的早期变化。
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2018 Dec;24(9_suppl):332S-339S. doi: 10.1177/1076029618814346. Epub 2018 Nov 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Sepsis-Induced Coagulopathy and Hypoalbuminemia: Endothelial Damage as Common Pathway and Clinical Implications on Mortality and Transfusion Risk.脓毒症诱导的凝血病和低白蛋白血症:内皮损伤作为共同途径及其对死亡率和输血风险的临床意义
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 24;14(13):4483. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134483.

本文引用的文献

1
How to manage coagulopathies in critically ill patients.如何管理危重症患者的凝血病。
Intensive Care Med. 2023 Mar;49(3):273-290. doi: 10.1007/s00134-023-06980-6. Epub 2023 Feb 17.
2
Unfractionated heparin improves the clinical efficacy in adult sepsis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.未分级肝素可提高成年脓毒症患者的临床疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Jan 21;22(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01545-w.
3
Sepsis and septic shock: endothelial molecular pathogenesis associated with vascular microthrombotic disease.
脓毒症和脓毒性休克:与血管微血栓形成性疾病相关的内皮分子发病机制
Thromb J. 2019 May 30;17:10. doi: 10.1186/s12959-019-0198-4. eCollection 2019.
4
Role of disseminated intravascular coagulation in severe sepsis.弥散性血管内凝血在严重脓毒症中的作用。
Thromb Res. 2019 Jun;178:182-188. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2019.04.025. Epub 2019 Apr 26.
5
Epidemiology of disseminated intravascular coagulation in sepsis and validation of scoring systems.脓毒症中弥散性血管内凝血的流行病学及评分系统的验证。
J Crit Care. 2019 Apr;50:23-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.11.009. Epub 2018 Nov 14.
6
Optimal patient selection for anticoagulant therapy in sepsis: an evidence-based proposal from Japan.脓毒症抗凝治疗的最佳患者选择:来自日本的循证建议。
J Thromb Haemost. 2018 Mar;16(3):462-464. doi: 10.1111/jth.13946. Epub 2018 Jan 29.
7
Inflammation and thrombosis: roles of neutrophils, platelets and endothelial cells and their interactions in thrombus formation during sepsis.炎症与血栓形成:脓毒症中中性粒细胞、血小板和内皮细胞及其相互作用在血栓形成中的作用。
J Thromb Haemost. 2018 Feb;16(2):231-241. doi: 10.1111/jth.13911. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
8
Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) POSITION STATEMENT: Why IDSA Did Not Endorse the Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines.美国传染病学会 (IDSA) 立场声明:为何 IDSA 未认可拯救脓毒症运动指南。
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 May 2;66(10):1631-1635. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix997.
9
Neutrophil Activation During Septic Shock.脓毒性休克期间的中性粒细胞激活。
Shock. 2018 Apr;49(4):371-384. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000980.
10
The epidemiology of sepsis in Brazilian intensive care units (the Sepsis PREvalence Assessment Database, SPREAD): an observational study.巴西重症监护病房脓毒症的流行病学(脓毒症患病率评估数据库,SPREAD):一项观察性研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2017 Nov;17(11):1180-1189. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30322-5. Epub 2017 Aug 17.