Clin Infect Dis. 2018 May 2;66(10):1631-1635. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix997.
IDSA did not endorse the 2016 Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines despite being represented in the working group that drafted the guidelines document. Leadership from the IDSA, the Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines, and the Society of Critical Care Medicine had numerous amicable discussions primarily regarding the bolded, rated guidelines recommendations. Our societies had different perspectives, however, regarding the interpretation of the major studies that informed the guidelines' recommendations, thus leading us to different conclusions and different perspectives on the recommendations. IDSA consequently elected not to endorse the guidelines. IDSA nonetheless hopes to be able to continue collaborating with the Surviving Sepsis Campaign and the Society of Critical Care Medicine to resolve our differences and to develop further strategies together to prevent sepsis and septic shock as well as reduce death and disability from these conditions both nationally and globally.
尽管参与了制定指南文件的工作组，但 IDSA 并未认可 2016 年的《拯救脓毒症运动指南》。来自 IDSA、拯救脓毒症运动指南和重症监护医学会的领导层进行了多次友好的讨论，主要涉及加粗的、有评级的指南推荐。然而，我们的学会对于指导方针建议所依据的主要研究有不同的看法，因此导致我们对建议有不同的结论和看法。因此，IDSA 选择不认可这些指南。尽管如此，IDSA 仍希望能够继续与拯救脓毒症运动和重症监护医学会合作，解决我们之间的分歧，并共同制定进一步的策略，以预防脓毒症和脓毒性休克，并减少这些疾病在国内外造成的死亡和残疾。
