• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用标准化护理术语来获取健康数据的社会决定因素:综合评价。

Use of Standardized Nursing Terminologies to Capture Social Determinants of Health Data: An Integrative Review.

机构信息

Author Affiliation: University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire College of Nursing and Health Sciences.

出版信息

Comput Inform Nurs. 2024 Nov 1;42(11):772-779. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000001171.

DOI:10.1097/CIN.0000000000001171
PMID:39110025
Abstract

Addressing social determinants of health in nursing care is important for improving health outcomes and reducing health inequities. Using standardized nursing terminologies to capture this information generates sharable data that can be used to achieve these goals and create new knowledge. The purpose of this integrative review was to examine use of standardized nursing terminologies for collecting social determinants of health data in nursing research and practice. The CINAHL, MEDLINE, and Web of Science databases were searched using the terms "social determinants of health" [and] "nursing" [and] "standardized terminology" or names for each of the 12 American Nurses Association-approved terminologies. Limiters included peer-reviewed and English language. After removal of duplicates, 120 articles were found and screened for relevance and quality using a three-step process. This yielded a final sample of seven articles. Article data were extracted and analyzed for themes. In all articles, retrospective, observational, or secondary analysis research designs were used to analyze previously collected data from large, deidentified datasets or research studies. The Omaha System was the only standardized nursing terminology represented in the sample. All operational definitions of social determinants of health included behavioral items. In most studies, a social determinants of health index score was calculated, and data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and visualization methods. Results reported across the articles were diverse; some themes were identified. This review revealed published literature on this topic is limited. More quality improvement and multisite studies that examine the use of standardized nursing terminologies by nurses to collect and use social determinants of health data are needed.

摘要

在护理中解决健康的社会决定因素对于改善健康结果和减少健康不平等至关重要。使用标准化的护理术语来捕捉这些信息可以生成可共享的数据,用于实现这些目标和创造新知识。本综合评价的目的是考察在护理研究和实践中使用标准化护理术语来收集健康的社会决定因素数据的情况。在 CINAHL、MEDLINE 和 Web of Science 数据库中,使用了“健康的社会决定因素”[和]“护理”[和]“标准化术语”或美国护士协会批准的 12 个术语中的每个术语的名称进行搜索。限制条件包括同行评议和英语。去除重复项后,发现了 120 篇文章,并使用三步流程对相关性和质量进行筛选。这产生了最终的 7 篇文章样本。提取文章数据并进行主题分析。在所有文章中,回顾性、观察性或二次分析研究设计用于分析来自大型、匿名数据集或研究的先前收集的数据。奥马哈系统是样本中唯一代表的标准化护理术语。健康的社会决定因素的所有操作性定义都包含行为项目。在大多数研究中,计算了健康的社会决定因素指数得分,并使用描述性统计和可视化方法分析数据。文章中报告的结果多种多样,确定了一些主题。这项综述表明,关于这个主题的文献有限。需要更多的质量改进和多地点研究,以检查护士使用标准化护理术语收集和使用健康的社会决定因素数据的情况。

相似文献

1
Use of Standardized Nursing Terminologies to Capture Social Determinants of Health Data: An Integrative Review.使用标准化护理术语来获取健康数据的社会决定因素:综合评价。
Comput Inform Nurs. 2024 Nov 1;42(11):772-779. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000001171.
2
Surveillance for Violent Deaths - National Violent Death Reporting System, 50 States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, 2022.暴力死亡监测——2022年全国暴力死亡报告系统,50个州、哥伦比亚特区和波多黎各
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2025 Jun 12;74(5):1-42. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7405a1.
3
Prognostic factors for return to work in breast cancer survivors.乳腺癌幸存者恢复工作的预后因素。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 May 7;5(5):CD015124. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015124.pub2.
4
Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.用于戒烟的电子烟。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 29;1(1):CD010216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010216.pub9.
5
Absorbent products for moderate-heavy urinary and/or faecal incontinence in women and men.适用于女性和男性中重度尿失禁和/或大便失禁的吸收性产品。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Oct 8(4):CD007408. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007408.
6
Community views on mass drug administration for soil-transmitted helminths: a qualitative evidence synthesis.社区对土壤传播蠕虫群体药物给药的看法:定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 20;6:CD015794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015794.pub2.
7
Assessing the comparative effects of interventions in COPD: a tutorial on network meta-analysis for clinicians.评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病干预措施的比较效果:面向临床医生的网状Meta分析教程
Respir Res. 2024 Dec 21;25(1):438. doi: 10.1186/s12931-024-03056-x.
8
Interventions for central serous chorioretinopathy: a network meta-analysis.中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变的干预措施:一项网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 16;6(6):CD011841. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011841.pub3.
9
Digital Information Exchange Between the Public and Researchers in Health Studies: Scoping Review.健康研究中公众与研究人员之间的数字信息交流:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 28;27:e63373. doi: 10.2196/63373.
10
Pelvic floor muscle training with feedback or biofeedback for urinary incontinence in women.针对女性尿失禁的盆底肌训练及反馈或生物反馈训练
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 11;3(3):CD009252. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009252.pub2.