Trundle Catherine, Gardner John, Phillips Tarryn
La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Qual Health Res. 2024 Aug 7:10497323241241225. doi: 10.1177/10497323241241225.
Interviews are central to the health ethnographers' toolkit. In this article, we offer a critical engagement with methodological literature coupled with reflective examples from our own research, in order to articulate the value of the ethnographic interview in health research. We contribute to literature on ethnographic interviews in two ways: by decoupling ethnographic interviews from the necessity of accompanying participant observation, and by outlining an ethnographic disposition towards interviewing. We define the seven key epistemic dispositions underpinning the ethnographic interview. These are humility, a readiness to revise core assumptions about a research topic, attentiveness to context, relationality, openness to complexity, an attention to ethnographic writing, and a consideration of the politics and history of the method. The strength of an epistemic understanding of the ethnographic interview is that it offers flexibility for developing a diverse array of interview techniques responsive to the needs of different research contexts and challenges. Ethnographic interviews, we show, contribute to the study of health through a richly explorative, responsive, contextualised, and reflexive approach.
访谈是健康领域民族志研究者工具包的核心内容。在本文中,我们对方法论文献进行批判性探讨,并结合我们自身研究中的反思性实例,以阐明民族志访谈在健康研究中的价值。我们从两个方面为民族志访谈的文献做出贡献:一是将民族志访谈与伴随参与观察的必要性脱钩,二是概述一种民族志访谈倾向。我们定义了支撑民族志访谈的七个关键认知倾向。这些倾向包括谦逊、愿意修正关于研究主题的核心假设、关注背景、关联性、对复杂性持开放态度、关注民族志写作以及考虑该方法的政治和历史。对民族志访谈的认知理解的优势在于,它为开发一系列多样的访谈技巧提供了灵活性,以应对不同研究背景和挑战的需求。我们表明,民族志访谈通过丰富的探索性、回应性、情境化和反思性方法,为健康研究做出贡献。