Fleer Joke, Smit Margreet J, Boer Hedwig J, Knevel Maleah, Velthuis Floor, Trippenzee Miranda, de Carvalho Filho Marco A, Scholtens Salome
Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Dean of University College Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Med Teach. 2025 Apr;47(4):580-588. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2024.2387809. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
There is a long and impressive scholarly history evidencing why it is important to address professional identity formation (PIF) in medical curricula. In this AMEE Guide, the authors present an evidence-informed pedagogical approach to assist educators in developing educational practices to foster a healthy PIF in medical students. The authors first describe the theoretical framework that underpin this approach. At the core of this framework is the recognition that, for a healthy PIF, students need to become aware that they have the autonomy, but also responsibility, to form their professional identity in a way that fits both their personality and their (future) professional role. In other words, students need to learn to navigate the interplay between socialization and subjectification. Next, the authors outline the six-step structure of their pedagogical approach, designed to help students: (1) undergo a PIF-related experience, (2) observe their responses to the experience, (3) externalize their reflections, (4) share their reflections, (5) broaden their perspective, and (6) explore their freedom of choice through experimentation. The authors also describe six conducive conditions to facilitate the implementation of the pedagogical approach. These conditions include (1) creating a setting that enables students to slow down, (2) adopting a longitudinal approach, (3) making it part of the formal curriculum, (4) refraining from grading, (5) establishing an interdisciplinary expert team, and (6) providing teacher training. The authors conclude that the theoretical framework leads to a coherent and consistent pedagogical approach that, when implemented according to the conducive conditions, enables students to gradually internalize the reflective process and help them to cultivate a reflective attitude towards their PIF.
有一段悠久且令人印象深刻的学术史证明了在医学课程中关注职业身份形成(PIF)为何重要。在本AMEE指南中,作者提出了一种基于证据的教学方法,以帮助教育工作者制定教育实践,在医学生中培养健康的职业身份形成。作者首先描述了支撑这种方法的理论框架。该框架的核心是认识到,对于健康的职业身份形成,学生需要意识到他们有自主权,但也有责任以适合自己个性和(未来)职业角色的方式塑造自己的职业身份。换句话说,学生需要学会在社会化和主体化之间的相互作用中找到方向。接下来,作者概述了他们教学方法的六个步骤结构,旨在帮助学生:(1)经历一次与职业身份形成相关的体验,(2)观察他们对该体验的反应,(3)将他们的反思外化,(4)分享他们的反思,(5)拓宽他们的视野,以及(6)通过实验探索他们的选择自由。作者还描述了六个有助于实施该教学方法的有利条件。这些条件包括(1)创造一个能让学生放慢脚步的环境,(2)采用纵向方法,(3)将其纳入正式课程,(4)不进行评分,(5)建立一个跨学科专家团队,以及(6)提供教师培训。作者得出结论,该理论框架导致了一种连贯一致的教学方法,当根据有利条件实施时,能使学生逐渐将反思过程内化,并帮助他们培养对自己职业身份形成的反思态度。