• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索英格兰初级保健中如何通过“数字促进”来支持患者使用在线服务:调查研究。

Exploring How Patients Are Supported to Use Online Services in Primary Care in England Through "Digital Facilitation": Survey Study.

机构信息

University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.

University of Liverpool, Department of Health Data Science, Liverpool, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 7;26:e56528. doi: 10.2196/56528.

DOI:10.2196/56528
PMID:39110960
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11339568/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Health service policy in many jurisdictions is driving greater investment into digital primary care services. While some patients and practices may benefit, there are concerns that not all are able or wish to access primary care services online. "Digital facilitation" is the "range of processes, procedures, and personnel seeking to support patients in their uptake and use of online services" and may address such concerns.

OBJECTIVE

As part of a multimethod research program, we undertook surveys of practice staff and patients to gain insight into the support being offered by practices and explore patients' experiences of this support.

METHODS

General practices from 4 regions of England were sent a questionnaire exploring the modes of digital facilitation offered, the personnel involved in its delivery, and views on the motivations and drivers for providing support. Moreover, 12,822 patients registered with 62 general practices (predominantly those providing practice survey responses) were sent a questionnaire exploring their experiences of any support offered by their practice to use online services.

RESULTS

Almost one-third of practices (156/500, 31.2%) responded to the practice survey, with most reporting using passive modes of digital facilitation (eg, display, leaflets, and SMS text messages) and few using active modes (eg, offering tablets or computers or using practice champions). However, 90.9% (130/143) reported providing ad hoc support. Practices agreed that it was the responsibility of both the practice (105/144, 72.9%) and the wider National Health Service (118/143, 82.5%) to support patients in using online services and that providing such support benefited the practice (126/144, 87.5%) and their patients (132/144, 91.7%). Nearly a quarter of the patients (3051/12,822, 23.8%) responded to the patient survey, with few (522/3051, 17.11% or less) reporting awareness of any modes of digital facilitation apart from text messages and emails (1205/3051, 39.5%) and only 13.36% (392/2935) reporting receiving support to use online services. Adjusted logistic regression analyses showed that older patients had a lower likelihood of 4 outcomes: being aware of, or of using, digital facilitation efforts, or being told about or being helped to use online services (all P<.05), particularly with regard to being helped to use online services (adjusted odds ratio for patients aged 85 years versus those aged 55-64 years: 0.08, 95% CI 0.02-0.36). However, ethnic minority participants or those for whom their first language was not English had positive associations with these outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

General practices recognize that patients would benefit from support to access online services. However, the support provided is often passive or ad hoc, and patients were seldom aware of digital facilitation efforts that their practice provided. There is potential to increase engagement with online primary care services by providing more support for all patients, particularly to provide targeted support for older patients.

摘要

背景

许多司法管辖区的医疗服务政策正在推动对数字初级保健服务的更大投资。虽然一些患者和实践可能受益,但也有人担心并非所有人都能够或愿意在线接受初级保健服务。“数字促进”是“旨在支持患者接受和使用在线服务的一系列流程、程序和人员”,可能会解决这些问题。

目的

作为一项多方法研究计划的一部分,我们对实践工作人员和患者进行了调查,以深入了解实践提供的支持,并探讨患者对这种支持的体验。

方法

从英格兰的 4 个地区向全科医生发放了一份调查问卷,调查了所提供的数字促进模式、参与提供的人员,以及对提供支持的动机和驱动因素的看法。此外,向 62 家全科医生(主要是那些提供实践调查回复的医生)注册的 12822 名患者发放了一份调查问卷,调查他们在使用在线服务时从实践中获得的任何支持的体验。

结果

近三分之一的实践(500 家中有 156 家,31.2%)回复了实践调查,大多数报告使用被动模式的数字促进(例如,展示、传单和短信),很少使用主动模式(例如,提供平板电脑或计算机或使用实践拥护者)。然而,90.9%(130/143)报告提供了临时支持。实践认为,支持患者使用在线服务是实践(105/144,72.9%)和更广泛的国家卫生服务体系(118/143,82.5%)的共同责任,提供这种支持对实践(126/144,87.5%)及其患者(132/144,91.7%)都有益。约四分之一的患者(12822 名中的 3051 名,23.8%)回复了患者调查,很少有(522/3051,17.11%或更少)除短信和电子邮件(1205/3051,39.5%)之外,了解任何数字促进模式,只有 13.36%(392/2935)报告接受了使用在线服务的支持。调整后的逻辑回归分析表明,年龄较大的患者有以下四个结果的可能性较低:了解或使用数字促进工作、被告知或获得使用在线服务的帮助(均 P<.05),特别是在获得使用在线服务的帮助方面(年龄在 85 岁的患者与年龄在 55-64 岁的患者相比,调整后的优势比为 0.08,95%置信区间为 0.02-0.36)。然而,少数民族参与者或其第一语言不是英语的参与者与这些结果呈正相关。

结论

全科医生认识到患者将从获得在线服务的支持中受益。然而,提供的支持往往是被动或临时的,患者很少了解实践提供的数字促进工作。通过为所有患者提供更多支持,特别是为老年患者提供有针对性的支持,有可能增加对在线初级保健服务的参与度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f8d/11339568/a7a9d704ebe1/jmir_v26i1e56528_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f8d/11339568/a7a9d704ebe1/jmir_v26i1e56528_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f8d/11339568/a7a9d704ebe1/jmir_v26i1e56528_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Exploring How Patients Are Supported to Use Online Services in Primary Care in England Through "Digital Facilitation": Survey Study.探索英格兰初级保健中如何通过“数字促进”来支持患者使用在线服务:调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 7;26:e56528. doi: 10.2196/56528.
2
Current experience and future potential of facilitating access to digital NHS primary care services in England: the Di-Facto mixed-methods study.当前在英格兰促进获取数字国民保健服务初级保健服务的经验和未来潜力:Di-Facto 混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Sep;12(32):1-197. doi: 10.3310/JKYT5803.
3
Investigating Patient Use and Experience of Online Appointment Booking in Primary Care: Mixed Methods Study.调查初级保健中患者在线预约的使用和体验:混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jul 8;26:e51931. doi: 10.2196/51931.
4
Digital Facilitation to Support Patient Access to Web-Based Primary Care Services: Scoping Literature Review.数字便利化支持患者获取基于网络的初级保健服务:范围文献综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jul 14;24(7):e33911. doi: 10.2196/33911.
5
The Use of Online Consultation Systems and Patient Experience of Primary Care: Cross-Sectional Analysis Using the General Practice Patient Survey.在线咨询系统的使用与基层医疗患者体验:基于全科医生患者调查的横断面分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jul 26;26:e51272. doi: 10.2196/51272.
6
What helps patients access web-based services in primary care? Free-text analysis of patient responses to the Di-Facto questionnaire.是什么帮助患者在初级保健中使用基于网络的服务?对 Di-Facto 问卷中患者回答的自由文本分析。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Jan 10;25(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02257-5.
7
Exploring the experiences and preferences of South Asian patients' of primary care in England since COVID-19.探索英格兰 COVID-19 以来的南亚初级保健患者的体验和偏好。
Health Expect. 2024 Feb;27(1):e13982. doi: 10.1111/hex.13982.
8
Digital First Primary Care for those with multiple long-term conditions: a rapid review of the views of stakeholders.针对多种慢性病患者的数字优先初级保健:利益相关者观点的快速综述。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Jul;12(21):1-68. doi: 10.3310/AWBT4827.
9
eHealth Literacy and the Use of NHS 111 Online Urgent Care Service in England: Cross-Sectional Survey.电子健康素养与英格兰 NHS111 在线紧急护理服务的使用:横断面调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jun 4;26:e50376. doi: 10.2196/50376.
10
A multimethod study of NHS 111 online.NHS111 在线的多方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Jun;11(5):1-104. doi: 10.3310/YTRR9821.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of digital facilitation to support the use of digital services in general practice in England: An interview study with key stakeholders.利用数字便利措施支持英格兰全科医疗中数字服务的使用:一项针对关键利益相关者的访谈研究
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2025 Jul;30(3):161-170. doi: 10.1177/13558196251316446. Epub 2025 Jan 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Investigating Patient Use and Experience of Online Appointment Booking in Primary Care: Mixed Methods Study.调查初级保健中患者在线预约的使用和体验:混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jul 8;26:e51931. doi: 10.2196/51931.
2
Digital facilitation: supporting the use of NHS digital and online services.数字便利化:支持使用英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)的数字和在线服务。
Br J Gen Pract. 2024 Mar 27;74(741):150-151. doi: 10.3399/bjgp24X736749. Print 2024 Apr.
3
What helps patients access web-based services in primary care? Free-text analysis of patient responses to the Di-Facto questionnaire.
是什么帮助患者在初级保健中使用基于网络的服务?对 Di-Facto 问卷中患者回答的自由文本分析。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Jan 10;25(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02257-5.
4
Inclusion health patient perspectives on remote access to general practice: a qualitative study.融合健康患者对远程访问全科医疗的看法:一项定性研究。
BJGP Open. 2023 Jun 27;7(2). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0023. Print 2023 Jun.
5
Older patients' experiences of access to and use of e-consultations with the general practitioner in Norway: an interview study.挪威老年患者使用电子咨询获取全科医生服务的体验:一项访谈研究。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2023 Mar;41(1):33-42. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2022.2161307. Epub 2023 Jan 2.
6
Unintended consequences of patient online access to health records: a qualitative study in UK primary care.患者在线获取健康记录的意外后果:英国初级保健中的定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2022 Dec 21;73(726):e67-e74. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2021.0720. Print 2023 Jan.
7
Digital Facilitation to Support Patient Access to Web-Based Primary Care Services: Scoping Literature Review.数字便利化支持患者获取基于网络的初级保健服务:范围文献综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jul 14;24(7):e33911. doi: 10.2196/33911.
8
The role of age and digital competence on the use of online health and social care services: A cross-sectional population-based survey.年龄和数字能力对在线健康与社会护理服务使用的影响:一项基于人群的横断面调查。
Digit Health. 2022 Jan 28;8:20552076221074485. doi: 10.1177/20552076221074485. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
9
Unintended consequences of online consultations: a qualitative study in UK primary care.在线咨询的意外后果:英国初级保健中的定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2022 Jan 27;72(715):e128-e137. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2021.0426. Print 2022 Feb.
10
Impact of COVID-19 on the digital divide: a rapid review.新冠疫情对数字鸿沟的影响:快速综述。
BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 12;11(10):e053440. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053440.