Suppr超能文献

人类在不确定环境中的运动策略:一种基于协同的稳定性-灵活性权衡方法。

Human movement strategies in uncertain environments: A synergy-based approach to the stability-agility tradeoff.

机构信息

Department of Health and Kinesiology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.

Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.

出版信息

Hum Mov Sci. 2024 Oct;97:103259. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2024.103259. Epub 2024 Aug 6.

Abstract

Humans frequently prepare for agile movements by decreasing stability. This facilitates transitions between movements but increases vulnerability to external disruptions. Therefore, humans might weigh the risk of disruption against the gain in agility and scale their stability to the likelihood of having to perform an agility-demanding action. We used the theory of motor synergies to investigate how humans manage this stability-agility tradeoff under uncertainty. This theory has long quantified stability using the synergy index, and reduction in stability before movement transitions using anticipatory synergy adjustment (ASA). However, the impact of uncertainty - whether a quick action should be executed or inhibited - on ASA is unknown. Furthermore, the impact of ASA on execution and inhibition of the action is unclear. We combined multi-finger, isometric force production with the go/no-go paradigm. Thirty participants performed constant force (no-go task), rapid force pulse (go task), and randomized go and no-go trials (go/no-go task) in response to visual cues. We measured the pre-cue finger forces and computed ASA using the uncontrolled manifold method and quantified the spatio-temporal features of the force after the visual cue. We expected ASA in both go/no-go and go tasks, but larger ASA for the latter. Surprisingly, we observed ASA only for the go task. For the go/no-go task, 53% of participants increased stability before the cue. The high stability hindered performance, leading to increased errors in no-go trials and lower peak forces in go trials. These results align with the stability-agility tradeoff. It is puzzling why some participants increased stability even though 80% of the trials demanded agility. This study indicates that individual differences in the effect of task uncertainty and motor inhibition on ASA is unexplored in motor synergy theory and presents a method for further development.

摘要

人类经常通过降低稳定性来为敏捷动作做准备。这有助于在动作之间转换,但增加了对外界干扰的脆弱性。因此,人类可能会权衡干扰的风险与敏捷性的收益,并根据需要执行敏捷性要求高的动作的可能性来调整其稳定性。我们使用运动协同理论来研究人类在不确定条件下如何管理这种稳定性-敏捷性权衡。该理论长期以来一直使用协同指数来量化稳定性,并用预期协同调整 (ASA) 来衡量运动转换前的稳定性降低。然而,不确定性的影响——是否应该执行或抑制快速动作——对 ASA 的影响是未知的。此外,ASA 对动作的执行和抑制的影响也不清楚。我们将多指等长力产生与“是/否”范式相结合。三十名参与者根据视觉提示执行恒定力(否任务)、快速力脉冲(是任务)和随机是和否任务。我们测量了预 cue 手指力,并使用非受控流形方法计算了 ASA,并量化了视觉 cue 后的力的时空特征。我们预计在是/否任务和是任务中都会有 ASA,但后者的 ASA 更大。令人惊讶的是,我们只观察到是任务中有 ASA。对于是/否任务,53%的参与者在 cue 前增加了稳定性。高稳定性阻碍了性能,导致否任务中的错误增加,是任务中的峰值力降低。这些结果与稳定性-敏捷性权衡一致。令人困惑的是,为什么有些参与者即使 80%的试验都需要敏捷性,他们还是增加了稳定性。这项研究表明,运动协同理论中尚未探讨任务不确定性和运动抑制对 ASA 的影响的个体差异,并且提出了进一步发展的方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验