Engebretsen Kaia B, Taso Mirad, Bjorland Siri, Jenssen Hanne K, Skaara Helene Engberg, Brox Jens Ivar
Department of Physical Medicine and rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Faculty of Medicine, Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Aug 7;25(1):629. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07743-0.
Most patients with cervical radiculopathy improve within the first months without treatment or with non-surgical treatment. A systematic review concluded that these patients improve, regardless of their intervention. Still, many patients are offered surgery, despite limited evidence regarding the indications for surgical treatments. The aim of this article is to describe the intervention that is going to be followed in the non-surgical treatment arm of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing the effectiveness of surgical and non-surgical treatment for patients with cervical radiculopathy.
The non-surgical intervention is a functional intervention within a cognitive approach founded on previous experiences, and current recommendations for best practice care of musculoskeletal pain and cervical radiculopathy. It is based on the biopsychosocial rather than a biomedical perspective, comprises an interdisciplinary approach (physicians, physiotherapy specialists), and includes brief intervention and graded activities. The intervention consists of 6 sessions over 12 weeks. The primary goals are first, to validate the patients´ symptoms and build a therapeutic alliance, second, to explore the understanding and promote alternatives, and third, to explore problems and opportunities based on patients´ symptoms and function. Motivational factors toward self-management are challenging. We will attempt shared decision-making in planning progress for the individual patient and emphasise learning of practical self-help strategies and encouragement to stay active (reinforcing the positive natural course). General physical activities such as walking will be promoted along with simple functional exercises for the neck- and shoulder region. We will also explore social activity, comorbidities, pain location, sleep, and work-related factors. The health providers will set individualised goals together with each patient.
The aim of the intervention is to describe a functional intervention within a cognitive approach for patients with chronic cervical radiculopathy. The effectiveness of the present program will be compared to surgery in a randomised controlled trial.
大多数神经根型颈椎病患者在最初几个月内未经治疗或接受非手术治疗即可改善。一项系统评价得出结论,无论采取何种干预措施,这些患者都会有所改善。然而,尽管关于手术治疗指征的证据有限,仍有许多患者接受了手术。本文的目的是描述一项随机对照试验(RCT)中非手术治疗组将采取的干预措施,该试验比较手术和非手术治疗对神经根型颈椎病患者的有效性。
非手术干预是一种基于以往经验以及当前肌肉骨骼疼痛和神经根型颈椎病最佳实践护理建议的认知方法下的功能干预。它基于生物心理社会而非生物医学视角,采用跨学科方法(医生、物理治疗专家),包括简短干预和分级活动。干预为期12周,共6次疗程。主要目标一是验证患者症状并建立治疗联盟,二是探索理解并促进替代方案,三是根据患者症状和功能探索问题与机会。自我管理的动机因素具有挑战性。我们将尝试在为个体患者规划进展时进行共同决策,并强调学习实用的自助策略以及鼓励保持活动(强化积极的自然病程)。将促进如散步等一般体育活动,同时进行颈部和肩部区域的简单功能锻炼。我们还将探索社交活动、合并症、疼痛部位、睡眠和工作相关因素。医疗服务提供者将与每位患者共同设定个性化目标。
该干预措施的目的是描述一种针对慢性神经根型颈椎病患者的认知方法下的功能干预。本方案的有效性将在一项随机对照试验中与手术进行比较。