Suppr超能文献

神经根型颈椎病的分类标准:一项国际电子德尔菲研究。

Classification criteria for cervical radiculopathy: An international e-Delphi study.

作者信息

Lam Kwun N, Heneghan Nicola R, Mistry Jai, Ojoawo Adesola O, Peolsson Anneli, Verhagen Arianne P, Tampin Brigitte, Thoomes Erik, Jull Gwendolen, Scholten-Peeters Gwendolyne G M, Slater Helen, Moloney Niamh, Hall Toby, Dedering Åsa, Rushton Alison, Falla Deborah

机构信息

Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain (CPR Spine), School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

Department of Medical Rehabilitation, Faculty of Basic Medical Sciences College of Health Sciences, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile Ife, Nigeria.

出版信息

Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2022 Oct;61:102596. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2022.102596. Epub 2022 Jun 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Establishing a set of uniform classification criteria (CC) for cervical radiculopathy (CR) is required to aid future recruitment of homogenous populations to clinical trials.

OBJECTIVES

To establish expert informed consensus on CC for CR.

DESIGN

A pre-defined four round e-Delphi study in accordance with the guidance on Conducting and Reporting Delphi Studies.

METHODS

Individuals with a background in physiotherapy who had authored two or more peer-reviewed publications on CR were invited to participate. The initial round asked opinions on CC for CR. Content analysis was performed on round one output and a list of discrete items were generated forming the round two survey. In rounds two to four, participants were asked to rate the level of importance of each item on a six-point Likert scale. Data were analysed descriptively using median, interquartile range and percentage agreement. Items reaching pre-defined consensus criteria were carried forward to the next round. Items remaining after the fourth round constituted expert consensus on CC for CR.

RESULTS

Twelve participants participated with one drop out. The final round identified one inclusion CC and 12 exclusion CC. The inclusion CC that remained achieved 82% agreement and was a cluster criterion consisting of radicular pain with arm pain worse than neck pain; paraesthesia or numbness and/or weakness and/or altered reflex; MRI confirmed nerve root compression compatible with clinical findings.

CONCLUSIONS

The CC identified can be used to inform eligibility criteria for future CR trials although caution should be practiced as consensus on measurement tools requires further investigation.

摘要

背景

需要建立一套统一的神经根型颈椎病(CR)分类标准(CC),以帮助未来在临床试验中招募同质化人群。

目的

就CR的CC达成专家知情共识。

设计

根据《德尔菲研究的实施与报告指南》进行预先定义的四轮电子德尔菲研究。

方法

邀请具有物理治疗背景且撰写过两篇或更多关于CR的同行评审出版物的个人参与。第一轮询问对CR的CC的意见。对第一轮输出进行内容分析,并生成一份离散项目清单,形成第二轮调查。在第二轮至第四轮中,要求参与者在六点李克特量表上对每个项目的重要性水平进行评分。使用中位数、四分位间距和百分比一致性对数据进行描述性分析。达到预先定义的共识标准的项目进入下一轮。第四轮后剩余的项目构成了关于CR的CC的专家共识。

结果

12名参与者参与,1人退出。最后一轮确定了1项纳入CC和12项排除CC。保留的纳入CC达成了82%的共识,是一个聚类标准,包括神经根性疼痛伴手臂疼痛重于颈部疼痛;感觉异常或麻木和/或无力和/或反射改变;MRI证实神经根受压与临床表现相符。

结论

确定的CC可用于为未来CR试验的纳入标准提供参考,尽管由于测量工具的共识需要进一步研究,应谨慎使用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验