• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用序贯性器官衰竭评估评分预测危重症 COVID-19 患者的死亡率。

Prediction of Mortality Using the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology, The Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.

出版信息

J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2024 Aug;34(8):874-878. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2024.08.874.

DOI:10.29271/jcpsp.2024.08.874
PMID:39113502
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the accuracy and reliability of the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score in predicting the risk of mortality in ICU-admitted COVID-19 patients.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study. Place and Duration of the Study: COVID Intensive Care Unit (ICU), The Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, from January to June 2022.

METHODOLOGY

A total of 62 patients with a positive RT-PCR for COVID-19, admitted into the intensive care unit (ICU), were included in this descriptive cross-sectional study. Written informed consent was obtained after explaining the risks and benefits of the study to the patients / next of kin. SOFA score at the time of admission and 48 hours after admission was calculated. The outcome variable, i.e., mortality, was assessed in association with the SOFA score.  Results: The study had a predominantly male population of 54.8% (n = 34). The SOFA score >7 at admission and 48 hours after admission was observed in 46.8% (n = 29) patients. Among 62 COVID-19 patients, the majority were found to have a severe nature of the disease, i.e., 69.4% (n = 43), followed by moderate / mild cases 30.6% (n = 19). Depending on the requirement of the patient, 74.2% (n = 46) were invasively ventilated while 77.4% (n = 48) were on non-invasive ventilation. Overall the mortality rate of the present study was 43.5% (n = 27). The scores both at the time of admission and 48 hours after admission for the survivors had a significant difference (p = 0.001) with the non-survivors.

CONCLUSION

The SOFA score on admission and 48 hours after had a significant positive association with the severity of COVID-19 infection and its risk of mortality.

KEY WORDS

COVID-19, Mortality prediction, SOFA score.

摘要

目的

确定序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分在预测 ICU 收治的 COVID-19 患者死亡风险方面的准确性和可靠性。

研究设计

横断面研究。研究地点和时间:COVID 重症监护病房(ICU),卡拉奇 Aga Khan 大学医院,2022 年 1 月至 6 月。

方法

本描述性横断面研究共纳入 62 例 COVID-19 阳性 RT-PCR、入住 ICU 的患者。在向患者/家属解释研究的风险和益处后,获得书面知情同意。计算入院时和入院后 48 小时的 SOFA 评分。将死亡率作为结局变量,与 SOFA 评分相关联。结果:研究人群主要为男性,占 54.8%(n=34)。入院时和入院后 48 小时 SOFA 评分>7 的患者占 46.8%(n=29)。在 62 例 COVID-19 患者中,大多数患者为重度疾病,占 69.4%(n=43),其次为中度/轻度疾病,占 30.6%(n=19)。根据患者的需求,74.2%(n=46)接受有创通气,77.4%(n=48)接受无创通气。本研究的总体死亡率为 43.5%(n=27)。幸存者入院时和入院后 48 小时的评分与非幸存者有显著差异(p=0.001)。

结论

入院时和入院后 48 小时的 SOFA 评分与 COVID-19 感染的严重程度及其死亡风险呈显著正相关。

关键词

COVID-19、死亡率预测、SOFA 评分。

相似文献

1
Prediction of Mortality Using the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients.使用序贯性器官衰竭评估评分预测危重症 COVID-19 患者的死亡率。
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2024 Aug;34(8):874-878. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2024.08.874.
2
Investigating SOFA, delta-SOFA and MPM-III for mortality prediction among critically ill patients at a private tertiary hospital ICU in Kenya: A retrospective cohort study.在肯尼亚一家私立三级医院 ICU 中,对危重症患者进行 SOFA、delta-SOFA 和 MPM-III 评分以预测死亡率:一项回顾性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 16;15(7):e0235809. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235809. eCollection 2020.
3
Predictive value of serial evaluation of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score for intensive care unit mortality in critically ill patients with COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study.连续评估序贯器官衰竭评估 (SOFA) 评分对 COVID-19 重症患者 ICU 死亡率的预测价值:一项回顾性队列研究。
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2022;54(1):3-11. doi: 10.5114/ait.2022.114048.
4
Predictors of Survival in Patients with Advanced Gastrointestinal Malignancies Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit.重症监护病房收治的晚期胃肠道恶性肿瘤患者的生存预测因素。
Oncologist. 2019 Apr;24(4):483-490. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0328. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
5
Epidemiology, outcomes, and utilization of intensive care unit resources for critically ill COVID-19 patients in Libya: A prospective multi-center cohort study.利比亚危重新冠肺炎患者重症监护病房资源的流行病学、结局和利用:一项前瞻性多中心队列研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 30;16(4):e0251085. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251085. eCollection 2021.
6
Serial evaluation of the SOFA score to predict outcome in critically ill patients.序贯评估序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分以预测危重症患者的预后
JAMA. 2001 Oct 10;286(14):1754-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.14.1754.
7
Acute kidney injury enhances outcome prediction ability of sequential organ failure assessment score in critically ill patients.急性肾损伤增强了序贯器官衰竭评估评分对危重症患者预后的预测能力。
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 3;9(10):e109649. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109649. eCollection 2014.
8
Describing organ dysfunction in the intensive care unit: a cohort study of 20,000 patients.描述重症监护病房中的器官功能障碍:一项涉及 20000 名患者的队列研究。
Crit Care. 2019 May 23;23(1):186. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2459-9.
9
Glasgow Coma Scale score dominates the association between admission Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score and 30-day mortality in a mixed intensive care unit population.在混合重症监护病房人群中,格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分在入院序贯器官衰竭评估评分与30天死亡率之间的关联中占主导地位。
J Crit Care. 2014 Oct;29(5):780-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.05.009. Epub 2014 May 28.
10
Soluble TNF receptors predict acute kidney injury and mortality in critically ill COVID-19 patients: A prospective observational study.可溶性肿瘤坏死因子受体预测危重症 COVID-19 患者的急性肾损伤和死亡:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Cytokine. 2022 Jan;149:155727. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2021.155727. Epub 2021 Oct 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictive Performance of SAPS-3, SOFA Score, and Procalcitonin for Hospital Mortality in COVID-19 Viral Sepsis: A Cohort Study.序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分、降钙素原及简化急性生理学评分(SAPS)-3对新型冠状病毒肺炎病毒脓毒症患者院内死亡率的预测性能:一项队列研究
Life (Basel). 2025 Jul 23;15(8):1161. doi: 10.3390/life15081161.