Department of Anesthesia, Aga Khan University Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya.
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 16;15(7):e0235809. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235809. eCollection 2020.
Outcomes in well-resourced, intensive care units (ICUs) in Kenya are thought to be comparable to those in high-income countries (HICs) but risk-adjusted mortality data is unavailable. We undertook an evaluation of the Aga Khan University Hospital, Nairobi ICU to analyze patient clinical-demographic characteristics, compare the performance of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), delta-SOFA at 48 hours and Mortality Prediction Model-III (MPM-III) mortality prediction systems, and identify factors associated with increased risk of mortality.
A retrospective cohort study was conducted of adult patients admitted to the ICU between January 2015 and September 2017. SOFA and MPM-III scores were determined at admission and SOFA repeated at 48 hours.
Approximately 33% of patients did not meet ICU admission criteria. Mortality among the population of critically ill patients in the ICU was 31.7%, most of whom were male (61.4%) with a median age of 53.4 years. High adjusted odds of mortality were found among critically ill patients with leukemia (aOR 6.32, p<0.01), tuberculosis (aOR 3.96, p<0.01), post-cardiac arrest (aOR 3.57, p<0.01), admissions from the step-down unit (aOR 3.13, p<0.001), acute kidney injury (aOR 2.97, p<0.001) and metastatic cancer (aOR 2.45, p = 0.04). The area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve of admission SOFA was 0.77 (95% CI, 0.73-0.81), MPM-III 0.74 (95% CI, 0.69-0.79), delta-SOFA 0.69 (95% CI, 0.63-0.75) and 48-hour SOFA 0.83 (95% CI, 0.79-0.87). The difference between SOFA at 48 hours and admission SOFA, MPM-III and delta-SOFA was statistically significant (chi2 = 17.1, 24.2 and 26.5 respectively; p<0.001). Admission SOFA, MPM-III and 48-hour SOFA were well calibrated (p >0.05) while delta-SOFA was borderline (p = 0.05).
Mortality among the critically ill was higher than expected in this well-resourced ICU. 48-hour SOFA performed better than admission SOFA, MPM-III and delta-SOFA in our cohort. While a large proportion of patients did not meet admission criteria but were boarded in the ICU, critically ill patients stepped-up from the step-down unit were unlikely to survive. Patients admitted following a cardiac arrest, and those with advanced disease such as leukemia, stage-4 HIV and metastatic cancer, had particularly poor outcomes. Policies for fair allocation of beds, protocol-driven admission criteria and appropriate case selection could contribute to lowering the risk of mortality among the critically ill to a level on par with HICs.
人们认为肯尼亚资源充足的重症监护病房(ICU)的治疗效果可与高收入国家(HIC)相媲美,但目前尚无风险调整后的死亡率数据。我们对肯尼亚内罗毕 Aga Khan 大学医院的 ICU 进行了评估,分析了患者的临床人口统计学特征,比较了序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)、48 小时 delta-SOFA 和死亡率预测模型-III(MPM-III)的表现,并确定了与死亡率升高相关的因素。
对 2015 年 1 月至 2017 年 9 月期间入住 ICU 的成年患者进行了回顾性队列研究。入院时确定 SOFA 和 MPM-III 评分,并在 48 小时后重复 SOFA 评分。
大约 33%的患者不符合 ICU 入住标准。ICU 危重症患者的死亡率为 31.7%,其中大多数为男性(61.4%),中位年龄为 53.4 岁。在患有白血病(aOR 6.32,p<0.01)、结核病(aOR 3.96,p<0.01)、心搏骤停后(aOR 3.57,p<0.01)、从降阶梯病房转入(aOR 3.13,p<0.001)、急性肾损伤(aOR 2.97,p<0.001)和转移性癌症(aOR 2.45,p = 0.04)的危重症患者中,死亡的调整优势比很高。入院 SOFA 的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积为 0.77(95%CI,0.73-0.81),MPM-III 为 0.74(95%CI,0.69-0.79),delta-SOFA 为 0.69(95%CI,0.63-0.75),48 小时 SOFA 为 0.83(95%CI,0.79-0.87)。48 小时 SOFA 与入院 SOFA、MPM-III 和 delta-SOFA 之间的差异具有统计学意义(chi2 = 17.1、24.2 和 26.5;p<0.001)。入院 SOFA、MPM-III 和 48 小时 SOFA 的校准效果良好(p>0.05),而 delta-SOFA 则处于边缘状态(p = 0.05)。
在这个资源充足的 ICU 中,危重症患者的死亡率高于预期。在我们的队列中,48 小时 SOFA 比入院 SOFA、MPM-III 和 delta-SOFA 表现更好。虽然很大一部分患者不符合入住标准,但仍被安置在 ICU 中,但从降阶梯病房转入的危重症患者存活的可能性较小。因心搏骤停而入院的患者,以及患有白血病、HIV 期 4 和转移性癌症等晚期疾病的患者,预后特别差。公平分配床位的政策、基于方案的入院标准和适当的病例选择可以有助于将危重症患者的死亡率降低到与 HIC 相当的水平。