Hallén Malin, Tryselius Kristina
School of Health and Welfare, Halmstad University, Halmstad, Sweden.
Department of Health and Caring Science, Linnaeus University, Linnaeus, Sweden.
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2024 Dec;19(1):2387842. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2024.2387842. Epub 2024 Aug 8.
The aim of this study is to, in the Swedish media debate, explore the discursive constructions of challenges in human rights and freedoms following the national spatial strategy for health and survival during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The study, inspired by a critical discourse analytic approach, focused particularly on the issues addressed, subject positions, relations and rhetoric. Seventeen opinion articles published in Swedish national newspapers December 2019 - February 2022 were analysed.
The main contents were , , and . Contents were expressed through three discourse dichotomies: , and
Striking about the results is the absence of dialogue, the one-way communication, and the absent politicians. It seems that the analysed debate on the challenges of the Swedish COVID-19 pandemic strategy, based on its impact on overall freedoms and rights, has not been the focus of decision-makers during the pandemic. They have neither addressed the threats highlighted in the articles, nor contributed to the discourse. This is worrying for the long-term maintenance and development of a healthy democracy.
本研究旨在探讨在瑞典媒体辩论中,新冠疫情期间国家健康与生存空间战略实施后,人权和自由方面挑战的话语建构。
本研究受批判性话语分析方法启发,特别关注所讨论的问题、主体立场、关系和修辞。分析了2019年12月至2022年2月在瑞典全国性报纸上发表的17篇评论文章。
主要内容为 、 以及 。内容通过三个话语二分法表达: 、 以及
结果令人惊讶的是缺乏对话、单向沟通以及政治家的缺席。基于瑞典新冠疫情战略对整体自由和权利的影响,所分析的关于该战略挑战的辩论似乎在疫情期间并非决策者关注的焦点。他们既未应对文章中强调的威胁,也未参与相关话语讨论。这对于健康民主的长期维护和发展而言令人担忧。