Mohammed Shan, Peter Elizabeth, Killackey Tieghan, Maciver Jane
Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Suite 130, Toronto, Ontario M5T1P8, Canada.
Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Suite 130, Toronto, Ontario M5T1P8, Canada; Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Peter Gilgan Centre for Research and Learning, 686 Bay Street, Room 069715, Toronto, Ontario M5G 0A4, Canada.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2021 May;117:103887. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.103887. Epub 2021 Jan 26.
Nurses have been labelled "heroes" by politicians, the mass media, and the general public to describe their commitment to providing front-line care to people with COVID-19, despite the risks of exposure and lack of clinical resources. Few studies have examined the implications of the hero discourse to nurses' professional, social, and political identities.
To critically examine the effects of the hero discourse on nurses who are contending with the ongoing COVID-19 crisis and to consider the political, social, cultural, and professional impact of this discourse on nursing work.
A poststructural discourse analysis, employing the theoretical ideas of truth, power, knowledge, subjectivity, and normalization, was conducted to explore the mass media's constructions of nurse as hero in the contexts of COVID-19. Media electronic databases were searched between March 1, 2020 to August 1, 2020 to locate newspaper and magazine articles, corporate advertisements, videos, social media postings, and institutional/corporate websites.
Data sources included English language media accounts that originated from Canada, the USA, and the UK.
Three main elements of the hero discourse include: 1. Nurses as a "necessary sacrifice" - portraying nurses as selfless, sacrificing, and outstanding moral subjects for practicing on the front-line without adequate protective gear and other clinical resources; 2. Nurses as "model citizens" - positioning nurses as compliant, hardworking, and obedient subjects in contrast to harmful individuals and groups that ignore or resist COVID-19 public health measures. 3. Heroism itself as the reward for nurses - characterizing hero worship as a fitting reward for nurses who were unappreciated pre-pandemic, as opposed to supporting long-term policy change, and highlighting how heroism reconfigures nursing work from the mundane and ordinary to the exciting and impactful.
The hero discourse is not a neutral expression of appreciation and sentimentality, but rather a tool employed to accomplish multiple aims such as the normalization of nurses' exposure to risk, the enforcement of model citizenship, and the preservation of existing power relationships that limit the ability of front-line nurses to determine the conditions of their work. Our study has implications for approaching the collective political response of nursing in the ongoing COVID-19 crisis and formalizing the ongoing emotional, psychological, ethical, and practice supports of nurses as the pandemic continues.
政治家、大众媒体和普通公众将护士称为“英雄”,以形容他们在面临接触风险且缺乏临床资源的情况下,仍致力于为新冠肺炎患者提供一线护理服务。很少有研究探讨“英雄”话语对护士职业、社会和政治身份的影响。
批判性地审视“英雄”话语对正在应对持续的新冠肺炎危机的护士的影响,并思考该话语对护理工作的政治、社会、文化和职业影响。
采用后结构话语分析方法,运用真理、权力、知识、主体性和常态化等理论观点,探讨大众媒体在新冠肺炎背景下将护士塑造为英雄的方式。在2020年3月1日至2020年8月1日期间搜索媒体电子数据库,以查找报纸和杂志文章、企业广告、视频、社交媒体帖子以及机构/企业网站。
数据来源包括来自加拿大、美国和英国的英语媒体报道。
“英雄”话语的三个主要元素包括:1. 护士是“必要的牺牲者”——将护士描绘成无私、自我牺牲且道德高尚的主体,他们在没有足够防护装备和其他临床资源的情况下在一线工作;2. 护士是“模范公民”——将护士定位为顺从、勤劳且听话的主体,与忽视或抵制新冠肺炎公共卫生措施的有害个人和群体形成对比;3. 英雄主义本身是对护士的回报——将英雄崇拜描述为对疫情前未得到赏识的护士的恰当回报,而不是支持长期政策变革,并强调英雄主义如何将护理工作从平凡普通转变为激动人心且有影响力。
“英雄”话语并非对赞赏和情感的中立表达,而是一种用于实现多个目标的工具,如使护士面临风险常态化、强化模范公民身份以及维护现有权力关系,这些权力关系限制了一线护士决定其工作条件的能力。我们的研究对于应对正在持续的新冠肺炎危机中护理行业的集体政治回应,以及在疫情持续期间规范对护士持续的情感、心理、伦理和实践支持具有启示意义。