Rao Preetika S, Downie Diane L, David-Ferdon Corinne, Beekmann Susan E, Santibanez Scott, Polgreen Philip M, Kuehnert Matthew, Courtney Sean, Lee Justin S, Chaitram Jasmine, Salerno Reynolds M, Gundlapalli Adi V
Office of Public Health Data, Surveillance and Technology, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Office of Readiness and Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024 Jul 13;11(8):ofae395. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofae395. eCollection 2024 Aug.
During routine clinical practice, infectious disease physicians encounter patients with difficult-to-diagnose clinical syndromes and may order advanced molecular testing to detect pathogens. These tests may identify potential infectious causes for illness and allow clinicians to adapt treatments or stop unnecessary antimicrobials. Cases of pathogen-agnostic disease testing also provide an important window into known, emerging, and reemerging pathogens and may be leveraged as part of national sentinel surveillance. A survey of Emerging Infections Network members, a group of infectious disease providers in North America, was conducted in May 2023. The objective of the survey was to gain insight into how and when infectious disease physicians use advanced molecular testing for patients with difficult-to-diagnose infectious diseases, as well as to explore the usefulness of advanced molecular testing and barriers to use. Overall, 643 providers answered at least some of the survey questions; 478 (74%) of those who completed the survey had ordered advanced molecular testing in the last two years, and formed the basis for this study. Respondents indicated that they most often ordered broad-range 16S rRNA gene sequencing, followed by metagenomic next-generation sequencing and whole genome sequencing; and commented that in clinical practice, some, but not all tests were useful. Many physicians also noted several barriers to use, including a lack of national guidelines and cost, while others commented that whole genome sequencing had potential for use in outbreak surveillance. Improving frontline physician access, availability, affordability, and developing clear national guidelines for interpretation and use of advanced molecular testing could potentially support clinical practice and public health surveillance.
在日常临床实践中,传染病医生会遇到临床综合征难以诊断的患者,并可能会进行先进的分子检测以检测病原体。这些检测可以识别疾病潜在的感染原因,并使临床医生能够调整治疗方案或停用不必要的抗菌药物。病原体不明疾病检测的案例也为了解已知、新出现和再次出现的病原体提供了一个重要窗口,并且可作为国家哨点监测的一部分加以利用。2023年5月对北美一组传染病医疗服务提供者——新兴感染网络成员进行了一项调查。该调查的目的是深入了解传染病医生如何以及何时对难以诊断的传染病患者使用先进的分子检测,同时探讨先进分子检测的实用性和使用障碍。总体而言,643名医疗服务提供者至少回答了部分调查问题;在完成调查的人中,有478人(74%)在过去两年中曾进行过先进的分子检测,这些人构成了本研究的基础。受访者表示,他们最常订购的是广谱16S rRNA基因测序,其次是宏基因组下一代测序和全基因组测序;并评论说,在临床实践中,部分(而非全部)检测是有用的。许多医生还指出了一些使用障碍,包括缺乏国家指南和成本问题,而其他人则评论说全基因组测序在疫情监测中有应用潜力。改善一线医生获取先进分子检测的途径、提高其可及性和可承受性,并制定明确的国家检测解读和使用指南,可能会对临床实践和公共卫生监测起到支持作用。