Khadka Asmita
Graduate School of Public Administration, National Institute of Development Administration, Bangkok, Thailand.
Jamba. 2024 Jul 25;16(1):1697. doi: 10.4102/jamba.v16i1.1697. eCollection 2024.
The COVID-19 pandemic's profound impacts on global health, driven by preparedness gaps and systemic risks, underscore the need to enhance societies' ability to manage both predictable risks and uncertainties inherent in disasters. While disaster research emphasises risk management for predictable threats and adaptive capacity for unexpected challenges, there is a lack of empirical examination of the impact of adaptive capacity on disaster resilience. This study addresses this gap by identifying three key adaptive capacities - quality of institutions, collaborative governance, and social capital - and examining their effects on COVID-19 resilience outcomes, measured by the ability to reduce excess mortality. Analysing secondary data from 129 nations using partial least squares structural equation modelling, the research finds significant positive effects of institutional quality and social capital on resilience outcomes. Conversely, collaborative governance shows a significant negative association, suggesting potentially intricate impacts beyond initial expectations. The findings highlight the need to enhance institutional quality and social capital to address preparedness gaps and unexpected challenges posed by biological hazards such as COVID-19. Future research should explore collaborative governance using a disaggregated approach that considers the roles of different stakeholders in various disaster phases.
This study advances disaster research by presenting practical methodologies for operationalising adaptive capacities and empirically examining their effects on disaster resilience. For practitioners and policymakers, it highlights the need to adopt a long-term perspective in building disaster resilience, focussing on improving institutional quality and social capital to manage the uncertainties and complexities inherent in disaster scenarios effectively.
由防范差距和系统性风险驱动的新冠疫情对全球健康产生了深远影响,这凸显了提高社会应对可预测风险和灾害中固有不确定性的能力的必要性。虽然灾害研究强调对可预测威胁的风险管理以及对意外挑战的适应能力,但缺乏对适应能力对灾害恢复力影响的实证研究。本研究通过确定三个关键适应能力——机构质量、协同治理和社会资本,并考察它们对新冠疫情恢复力结果的影响(以降低超额死亡率的能力来衡量)来填补这一空白。通过使用偏最小二乘结构方程模型分析来自129个国家的二手数据,研究发现机构质量和社会资本对恢复力结果有显著的积极影响。相反,协同治理显示出显著的负相关,表明其影响可能比最初预期的更为复杂。研究结果凸显了提高机构质量和社会资本以应对新冠疫情等生物危害带来的防范差距和意外挑战的必要性。未来的研究应采用一种分解方法来探索协同治理,该方法要考虑不同利益相关者在不同灾害阶段的作用。
本研究通过提出将适应能力付诸实践的实用方法并实证考察其对灾害恢复力的影响,推进了灾害研究。对于从业者和政策制定者而言,它凸显了在建设灾害恢复力方面采取长期视角的必要性,即专注于提高机构质量和社会资本,以有效应对灾害情景中固有的不确定性和复杂性。