Papcke Caluê, Manffra Elisangela Ferretti, Teixeira Luís Augusto, Nohama Percy, Scheeren Eduardo Mendonça
Graduate Program in Health Technology, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.
Human Motor Systems Laboratory, School of Physical Education and Sport, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
J Mot Behav. 2024;56(6):655-664. doi: 10.1080/00222895.2024.2360515. Epub 2024 Aug 8.
Reciprocal inhibition and coactivation are strategies of the central nervous system used to perform various daily tasks. In automatic postural responses (APR), coactivation is widely investigated in the ankle joint muscles, however reciprocal inhibition, although clear in manipulative motor actions, has not been investigated in the context of APRs. The aim was to identify whether reciprocal inhibition can be observed as a strategy in the recruitment of gastrocnemius Medialis (GM), Soleus (So) and Tibialis Anterior (TA) muscles in low- and high-velocity forward and backward perturbations. We applied two balance perturbations with a low and a high velocity of displacement of the movable platform in forward and backward conditions and we evaluated the magnitude and latency time of TA, GM and So activation latency, measured by electromyography (EMG). In forward perturbations, coactivation of the three muscles was observed, with greater activation amplitude of the GM and lesser amplitude of the So and TA muscles. For backward, the pattern of response observed was activation of the TA muscle, a decrease in the EMG signal, which characterizes reciprocal inhibition of the GM muscle and maintenance of the basal state of the So muscle. This result indicates that backward perturbations are more challenging.
交互抑制和共同激活是中枢神经系统用于执行各种日常任务的策略。在自动姿势反应(APR)中,共同激活在踝关节肌肉中得到了广泛研究,然而,交互抑制虽然在操纵性运动动作中很明显,但尚未在APR的背景下进行研究。目的是确定在低速和高速向前和向后扰动中,在腓肠肌内侧(GM)、比目鱼肌(So)和胫骨前肌(TA)的募集过程中,是否可以观察到交互抑制作为一种策略。我们在向前和向后条件下,对可移动平台应用了两种不同速度(低速和高速)的平衡扰动,并通过肌电图(EMG)评估了TA、GM和So激活潜伏期的大小和延迟时间。在向前扰动中,观察到三块肌肉的共同激活,GM的激活幅度更大,而So和TA肌肉的幅度较小。对于向后扰动,观察到的反应模式是TA肌肉的激活,EMG信号的下降,这表明GM肌肉的交互抑制以及So肌肉基础状态的维持。这一结果表明向后扰动更具挑战性。