Guo Yang, Pernal Katarzyna
Qingdao Institute for Theoretical and Computational Sciences, Institute of Frontier Chemistry, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Shandong University, Qingdao, Shandong 266237, China.
Institute of Physics, Lodz University of Technology, ul. Wolczanska 217/221, 93-005 Lodz, Poland.
Faraday Discuss. 2024 Nov 6;254(0):332-358. doi: 10.1039/d4fd00054d.
The adiabatic connection (AC) approximation, along with its linearized variant AC0, was introduced as a method of obtaining dynamic correlation energy. When using a complete active space self-consistent field (CASSCF) wave function as a reference, the AC0 approximation is considered one of the most efficient multi-reference perturbation theories. It only involves the use of 1st- and 2nd-order reduced density matrices. However, some numerical results have indicated that the excitation energies predicted by AC0 are not as reliable as those from the second-order N-electron valence state perturbation theory (NEVPT2). In this study, we develop a spinless formulation of AC0 based on the Dyall Hamiltonian and provide a detailed comparison between AC0 and NEVPT2 approaches. We demonstrate the components within the correlation energy expressions that are common to both methods and those unique to either AC0 or NEVPT2. We investigate the role of the terms exclusive to NEVPT2 and explore the possibility of enhancing AC0's performance in this regard.
绝热连接(AC)近似及其线性化变体AC0,作为一种获取动态相关能的方法被引入。当使用完全活性空间自洽场(CASSCF)波函数作为参考时,AC0近似被认为是最有效的多参考微扰理论之一。它仅涉及使用一阶和二阶约化密度矩阵。然而,一些数值结果表明,AC0预测的激发能不如二阶N电子价态微扰理论(NEVPT2)预测的可靠。在本研究中,我们基于Dyall哈密顿量开发了一种无自旋形式的AC0,并对AC0和NEVPT2方法进行了详细比较。我们展示了两种方法相关能表达式中共同的部分以及AC0或NEVPT2独有的部分。我们研究了NEVPT2独有的项的作用,并探讨了在这方面提高AC0性能的可能性。