Department of Hypertension and Endocrinology, Daping Hospital, Army Medical, University of PLA, Center for Hypertension and Metabolic Diseases, ChongqingInstitute of Hypertension, Chongqing, 400042, China.
Hypertens Res. 2024 Oct;47(10):2884-2894. doi: 10.1038/s41440-024-01815-3.
Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) for bilateral primary aldosteronism (PA) are the mainstay option recommended by guidelines, but poor compliance occurs due to numerous side effects. We aimed to examine whether catheter-based adrenal ablation could be an alternative treatment for bilateral PA.644 PA patients were included from a total of 6054 hypertensive patients. Adrenal CT scan and adrenal venous sampling (AVS) were both performed for PA subtype classification. Clinical and biochemical outcomes were assessed at 6 months after treatment according to the Primary Aldosteronism Surgical Outcome (PASO) criteria.93 patients with PA were recruited to be treated by adrenal ablation, including 25 bilateral PA and 68 unilateral PA according to AVS results. Office SBP and DBP significantly decreased from baseline levels, serum potassium levels increased and ARR significantly decreased (p < 0.01) in both the bilateral and unilateral groups. In the bilateral group, complete, partial and absent clinical success was achieved in 6 (24.0%), 11 (44.0%) and 8(32.0%) patients, respectively. In the unilateral group, complete, partial and absent clinical success was achieved in 12 (17.6%), 37 (54.4%), and 19 (27.9%) patients, respectively. The numbers of patients achieving complete, partial, and absent biochemical success were 15 (60.0%), 6 (24.0%), and 4 (16.0%), respectively, in the bilateral group versus 37 (54.4%), 9 (13.2%), and 22 (32.3%), respectively, in the unilateral group. In conclusion, we provide evidence for the beneficial outcomes of unilateral adrenal ablation for patients with bilateral PA. Our findings provide insight into an alternative option for patients with bilateral excess aldosterone.
醛固酮受体拮抗剂 (MRA) 是指南推荐的双侧原发性醛固酮增多症 (PA) 的主要治疗选择,但由于许多副作用,患者的依从性较差。我们旨在研究经导管肾上腺消融是否可以作为双侧 PA 的替代治疗方法。
从总共 6054 例高血压患者中纳入 644 例 PA 患者。对 PA 亚型进行分类时,同时进行肾上腺 CT 扫描和肾上腺静脉采样 (AVS)。根据原发性醛固酮增多症手术结局 (PASO) 标准,在治疗后 6 个月评估临床和生化结局。
根据 AVS 结果,93 例 PA 患者被招募接受肾上腺消融治疗,包括 25 例双侧 PA 和 68 例单侧 PA。双侧和单侧组的诊室 SBP 和 DBP 均较基线水平显著降低,血钾水平升高,ARR 显著降低(p < 0.01)。在双侧组中,6 例(24.0%)、11 例(44.0%)和 8 例(32.0%)患者分别达到完全、部分和无临床成功。在单侧组中,12 例(17.6%)、37 例(54.4%)和 19 例(27.9%)患者分别达到完全、部分和无临床成功。双侧组完全、部分和无生化成功的患者人数分别为 15 例(60.0%)、6 例(24.0%)和 4 例(16.0%),而单侧组分别为 37 例(54.4%)、9 例(13.2%)和 22 例(32.3%)。
总之,我们为单侧肾上腺消融治疗双侧 PA 患者的有益结局提供了证据。我们的发现为双侧醛固酮过多的患者提供了一种替代选择。