Wu H, Luo J Y, Yang P Y, Yuan K M, Li J
Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, the Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University; Key Laboratory of Pediatric Anesthesiology, Ministry of Education; Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology of Zhejiang Province, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325024, China.
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2024 Aug 13;104(31):2928-2935. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20240121-00151.
To compare the postoperative analgesic effect of modified superior trunk block and traditional interscalene brachial plexus block in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. A total of 40 patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University from October to November 2023 were prospectively included, whose American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade were Ⅰ-Ⅱ. They were divided into modified superior trunk block group (group S) and interscalene brachial plexus block group (group I) by random number table according to different nerve block methods, with 20 cases in each group. Local anesthetics was a mixture of 1.33% liposomal bupivacaine and 0.5% levobupivacaine hydrochloride injection in equal volume. Patients in group S were injected 5 ml mixture for ultrasound-guided modified superior trunk block, and patients in group I were injected with 15 ml mixture for ultrasound-guided traditional interscalene block respectively. Both groups underwent superficial cervical plexus block (5 ml mixture). Standardized general anesthesia and standardized postoperative analgesia were followed. The primary outcome measures included 48 h resting numerical rating scale (NRS) scores after surgery and the incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis (HDP) at 30 min after block. The secondary outcome measures included resting NRS scores during the post anesthesia care unit (PACU), 12, 24, and 36 h after surgery, postoperative opioid consumption and satisfaction with analgesia, pulse oxygen saturation (SpO) at 30 min after block, sensory and motor block duration, and the incidence of perioperative adverse reactions. The non-inferiority cut-off value of resting NRS scores for patients in group S was set as"1 point"at each observation time point after surgery. In group S, one patient was excluded because the target nerve was blocked by the subclavian vein and could not be blocked, nineteen patients [11 males and 8 females, aged (52.2±9.0) years] were eventually included. In group I, there were 7 males and 13 females, aged (55.0±5.1) years. Resting NRS scores of group S and Group I at 48 h after surgery were 0 (0, 0) and 0 (0, 0.8) point, respectively, with no statistical significance (>0.05). The median difference was 0 (95%:0-0) point and the upper 95% was 0 point, which was lower than the preset non-inferiority cut-off value"1 point"(non-inferiority <0.001). The incidence of HDP in group S and group I were 5% (1/19) and 75% (15/20), respectively, with statistically significant (<0.001). There were no significant differences in resting NRS scores at PACU and 12, 24, 36 h after surgery, opioid dosage, satisfaction with analgesia, SpO at 30 min after block, sensory and motor block duration between two groups (all >0.05). No respiratory adverse events such as hypoxemia and airway spasm occurred in two groups after extubation. One patient in group I showed symptoms of breath shortness when entering PACU, and 3 patients felt uncomfortable due to prolonged numbness and weakness of the blockade limb (>2 days). No nerve block procedures and opioid drugs relative adverse reactions and no neurological complications happened in both groups. Liposomal bupivacaine usage for modified superior trunk block can provide long-term postoperative analgesic effects which is noninferior to traditional interscalene brachial plexus block and causes less HDP in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.
比较改良上干阻滞与传统肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞在关节镜下肩袖修复术中的术后镇痛效果。前瞻性纳入2023年10月至11月在温州医科大学附属第二医院接受关节镜下肩袖修复术的40例患者,其美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级为Ⅰ-Ⅱ级。根据不同神经阻滞方法,采用随机数字表法将其分为改良上干阻滞组(S组)和肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞组(I组),每组20例。局部麻醉药为等体积的1.33%脂质体布比卡因与0.5%盐酸左旋布比卡因注射液的混合液。S组患者采用超声引导下改良上干阻滞注射5ml混合液,I组患者采用超声引导下传统肌间沟阻滞注射15ml混合液。两组均行颈浅丛阻滞(5ml混合液)。遵循标准化全身麻醉和标准化术后镇痛。主要观察指标包括术后48h静息数字评分量表(NRS)评分及阻滞后30min半膈肌麻痹(HDP)发生率。次要观察指标包括麻醉后恢复室(PACU)、术后12、24和36h的静息NRS评分、术后阿片类药物消耗量及镇痛满意度、阻滞后30min脉搏血氧饱和度(SpO)、感觉和运动阻滞持续时间以及围手术期不良反应发生率。S组患者术后各观察时间点静息NRS评分的非劣效性界值设定为“1分”。S组中,1例患者因目标神经被锁骨下静脉阻挡无法阻滞而被排除,最终纳入19例患者[男11例,女8例,年龄(52.2±9.0)岁]。I组中,男7例,女13例,年龄(55.0±5.1)岁。S组和I组术后48h静息NRS评分分别为0(0,0)分和0(0,0.8)分,差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。中位数差值为0(95%:0 - 0)分,95%上限为0分,低于预设的非劣效性界值“1分”(非劣效性<0.001)。S组和I组HDP发生率分别为5%(1/19)和75%(15/20),差异有统计学意义(<0.001)。两组间在PACU及术后12、24、36h的静息NRS评分、阿片类药物用量、镇痛满意度、阻滞后30min SpO、感觉和运动阻滞持续时间方面差异均无统计学意义(均>0.05)。两组拔管后均未发生低氧血症、气道痉挛等呼吸不良事件。I组1例患者进入PACU时出现气短症状,3例患者因阻滞肢体麻木和无力时间延长(>2天)而感觉不适。两组均未发生与神经阻滞操作及阿片类药物相关的不良反应和神经并发症。脂质体布比卡因用于改良上干阻滞可为关节镜下肩袖修复术患者提供与传统肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞相当的术后长期镇痛效果,且HDP发生率更低。