Xie L, Jia X Y, An M Z, Xi Y Z, Li Z P, Zhou Q H
Department of Anesthesiology, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 330100, China Department of Anesthesiology, Jiaxing University Affiliated Hospital, Jiaxing 314000, China.
Department of Anesthesiology, Jiaxing University Affiliated Hospital, Jiaxing 314000, China.
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2024 Oct 22;104(39):3661-3668. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20240306-00504.
To compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided infraspinatus-teres minor interfascial block and interscalene block in shoulder arthroscopic surgery. A total of 74 patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopic surgery at the Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University from December 2023 to February 2024 were prospectively included, whose age ranged from 18 to 80 years and the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade were Ⅰ-Ⅲ. Patients were divided into two groups using block randomization: infraspinatus-teres minor interfascial block group (observation group) and interscalene block group (control group), with 37 cases in each group. In the anesthesia preparation room, all patients received nerve blocks under ultrasound guidance with 20 ml of 0.375% ropivacaine. Patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) was administered to all patients following surgery. The primary outcome was the area under the curve (AUC) of the numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain within 24 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcome measures included the highest NRS score within 48 hours postoperatively, the amount of sufentanil used via PCIA within 48 hours postoperatively, the incidence of rescue analgesia and rebound pain, QoR-40 scores, and the rate of postoperative nausea and vomiting within 24 hours. The non-inferiority margin for the AUC of NRS scores between the two types of regional nerve blocks was set at "2.6". A total of 35 patients were included in the observation group [17 males, 18 females, aged (58.1±9.1) years], and 36 patients were included in the control group [12 males, 24 females, aged (57.0±9.8) years]. The AUC of the NRS scores at rest within 24 hours post-operation was 51.7±10.9 in the observation group and 62.6±13.6 in the control group. The difference in AUC between the two groups was -10.9 (95%:-16.8--5.1), with the upper limit of the 95% falling below the predefined non-inferiority margin of "2.6" (non-inferiority <0.001). The highest NRS score [ (, )] within 48 hours post-surgery was 3 (3, 4) in the control group, which was significantly higher than the observation group's score of 2 (2, 3) (<0.001). During the postoperative period of 0-12 hours, the observation group received a median dose of 12 (10, 14) μg of sufentanil, which was significantly higher than the control group's dose of 8 (6, 10) μg (<0.001). During the postoperative period of 12-24 hours, the observation group received a median dose of 8 (8, 10) μg of sufentanil, which was significantly lower than the control group's median dose of 12 (10, 14) μg (<0.001). During the postoperative period of 24-48 hours, there was no statistically significant difference in the dose of sufentanil between the two groups of patients (=0.548). In the observation group, the incidence of rescue analgesia within 48 hours postoperatively was 0 (0/35), which was lower than that of the control group at 22.2% (8/36) (=0.010). The occurrence of rebound pain in the observation group was 0 (0/35), and the control group was 11.1% (4/36), no statistically significant difference was found between two groups (=0.130). In the observation group, the QoR-40 score within 24 hours post-operation was 180.2±3.2, which was higher than the control group's score of 175.8±4.7 (<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting within 24 hours between the two groups (=0.372). Ultrasound-guided infraspinatus-teres minor interfascial block demonstrates a comparable analgesic effect to interscalene block in shoulder arthroscopic surgery within the first 24 hours postoperatively.
比较超声引导下冈下肌-小圆肌筋膜间阻滞与肌间沟阻滞在肩关节镜手术中的术后镇痛效果。前瞻性纳入2023年12月至2024年2月在嘉兴学院附属医院接受肩关节镜手术的74例患者,年龄18至80岁,美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级为Ⅰ-Ⅲ级。采用区组随机化将患者分为两组:冈下肌-小圆肌筋膜间阻滞组(观察组)和肌间沟阻滞组(对照组),每组37例。在麻醉准备室,所有患者在超声引导下接受20 ml 0.375%罗哌卡因的神经阻滞。术后所有患者均给予患者自控静脉镇痛(PCIA)。主要结局是术后24小时内疼痛数字评分量表(NRS)的曲线下面积(AUC)。次要结局指标包括术后48小时内的最高NRS评分、术后48小时内PCIA使用的舒芬太尼用量、补救镇痛和反弹痛的发生率、QoR-40评分以及术后24小时内恶心呕吐的发生率。两种区域神经阻滞NRS评分AUC的非劣效界值设定为“2.6”。观察组纳入35例患者[男17例,女18例,年龄(58.1±9.1)岁],对照组纳入36例患者[男12例,女24例,年龄(57.0±9.8)岁]。术后24小时静息时NRS评分的AUC在观察组为51.7±10.9,在对照组为62.6±13.6。两组AUC的差异为-10.9(95%:-16.8--5.1),95%可信区间上限低于预先设定的非劣效界值“2.6”(非劣效性<0.001)。术后48小时内最高NRS评分[(,)]对照组为3(3,4),显著高于观察组的2(2,3)(<0.001)。术后0至12小时,观察组舒芬太尼中位用量为12(10,14)μg,显著高于对照组的剂量8(6,10)μg(<0.001)。术后12至24小时,观察组舒芬太尼中位用量为8(8,10)μg,显著低于对照组的中位剂量12(10,14)μg(<0.001)。术后24至48小时,两组患者舒芬太尼用量无统计学差异(=0.548)。观察组术后48小时内补救镇痛发生率为0(0/35),低于对照组的22.2%(8/36)(=0.010)。观察组反弹痛发生率为0(0/35),对照组为11.1%(4/36),两组间无统计学差异(=0.130)。观察组术后24小时内QoR-40评分为180.2±3.2,高于对照组的175.8±4.7(<0.001)。两组术后24小时内恶心呕吐发生率无统计学差异(=0.372)。超声引导下冈下肌-小圆肌筋膜间阻滞在肩关节镜手术后24小时内的镇痛效果与肌间沟阻滞相当。