Suppr超能文献

道德认同与情绪健康的关系:一项元分析。

Moral identity in relation to emotional well-being: a meta-analysis.

作者信息

Goering Marlon, Espinoza Carlos N, Mercier Alecia, Eason Emma K, Johnson Charles W, Richter Caroline G

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2024 Mar 12;15:1346732. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1346732. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This meta-analytic review surveyed previous empirical studies that examined links between moral identity and indicators of emotional well-being. Additionally, this meta-analysis examined cultural origin as a moderator, testing if links between moral identity and emotional well-being differ in collectivistic vs. individualistic countries.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted through ProQuest's 65 databases and PubMed. A random-effect meta-analysis and subgroup analyses were conducted using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis 4.0 (CMA) software.

RESULTS

Drawing on 27 eligible studies, moral identity was associated with greater emotional well-being ( = 0.27, < 0.001). Follow up analyses on individual dimensions showed medium effect sizes in links between moral identity and greater happiness or positive affect ( = 0.28, < 0.001), greater sense of purpose or meaning in life ( = 0.29, < 0.001), and higher self-esteem ( = 0.25, < 0.001). Moreover, moral identity was associated with greater life satisfaction showing a small effect size ( = 0.15, = 0.011). Results showed that effect sizes of links between moral identity and overall emotional well-being did not significantly differ by cultural origin. However, effect sizes tended to be larger in the nine studies that were conducted in collectivistic countries ( = 0.30, < 0.001) as compared to the 15 studies that were conducted in individualistic countries ( = 0.27, < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

The results of this meta-analysis indicate a robust empirical relationship between moral identity and emotional well-being that is present across various dimensions of emotional well-being and in both individualistic and collectivistic cultures.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

https://osf.io/94f8b/?view_only=6db54da0fa304c83993d0438ecb5c637.

摘要

引言

本荟萃分析回顾了以往实证研究,这些研究考察了道德认同与情感幸福感指标之间的联系。此外,本荟萃分析将文化起源作为一个调节变量进行研究,检验道德认同与情感幸福感之间的联系在集体主义国家和个人主义国家是否存在差异。

方法

通过ProQuest的65个数据库和PubMed进行了系统的文献综述。使用综合荟萃分析4.0(CMA)软件进行了随机效应荟萃分析和亚组分析。

结果

基于27项符合条件的研究,道德认同与更高的情感幸福感相关(r = 0.27,p < 0.001)。对各个维度的后续分析表明,道德认同与更高的幸福感或积极情绪(r = 0.28,p < 0.001)、更强的生活目标感或意义感(r = 0.29,p < 0.001)以及更高的自尊(r = 0.25,p < 0.001)之间的联系具有中等效应量。此外,道德认同与更高的生活满意度相关,效应量较小(r = 0.15,p = 0.011)。结果表明,道德认同与总体情感幸福感之间联系的效应量在不同文化起源之间没有显著差异。然而,与在个人主义国家进行的15项研究(r = 0.27,p < 0.001)相比,在集体主义国家进行的9项研究中,效应量往往更大(r = 0.30,p < 0.001)。

讨论

本荟萃分析的结果表明,道德认同与情感幸福感之间存在稳健的实证关系,这种关系存在于情感幸福感的各个维度以及个人主义和集体主义文化中。

系统评价注册

https://osf.io/94f8b/?view_only=6db54da0fa304c83993d0438ecb5c637

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e9d/11307125/9f212577769a/fpsyg-15-1346732-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验